Agreed... Here is my Equivalent... since i have a Crop Body 200MM = 300MM...300mm at 2.8 is a beautiful thing.
Uh, no. The longer the actual lens, the more it compresses the background and effects bokeh. All a crop body does is...crop.Agreed... Here is my Equivalent... since i have a Crop Body 200MM = 300MM...
A quick explanation stolen from the tubes.Ahh okay.... either way, good Bokeh!
Two images taken from the same location, one with a wide angle lens and the other with a telephoto lens, will show identical perspective, in that near and far objects appear the same relative size to each other. Comparing magnification by using a long lens to magnification by moving closer, however, the telephoto shot appears to compress the distance between objects due to the perspective from the more distant location. Long lenses thus give a photographer an alternative to the type of perspective distortion exhibited by shorter focal length lenses where (when the photographer stands closer to the given subject) different portions of a subject in a photograph can appear out of proportion to each other.
Long lenses also make it easier to blur the background more, even when the depth of field is the same; photographers will sometimes use this effect to defocus the background in an image to "separate" it from the subject.
assuming you're printing at the same size he's right tho, as the printing effectively enlarges that "200mm" print to "300mm" enlargement.Uh, no. The longer the actual lens, the more it compresses the background and effects bokeh. All a crop body does is...crop.
Yep, it's not quite as cut and dry as a crop body just cropping, because the pixel density is higher on that crop body.assuming you're printing at the same size he's right tho, as the printing effectively enlarges that "200mm" print to "300mm" enlargement.
Correct. However, in neither case, the 200mm lens give you the same compression of DOF as a 300mm lens. Optically, they are still different and light reacts differently in them. The way/size they are recorded does not change that.Yep, it's not quite as cut and dry as a crop body just cropping, because the pixel density is higher on that crop body.
For instance, the 24 megapixel D3x gives you a 10 megapixel 1.5x crop. Which means that the pixel density on the D300 is still higher.
For bokeh, a full frame body will provide you a smaller depth of field for the same framing, since the full frame body is using a 300mm lens and the crop body is using a 200mm lens... but for resolution/magnification purposes, the higher pixel density of the crop body really does bring it close to the resolution/magnification of that 300mm lens.
i don't think this is correct. DOF depends on sensor density (aka "circle of confusion"), effective focal length, and subject distance and that's it assuming your lens is wide open. being stopped down brings up issues with number of blades in the aperture, etc.Correct. However, in neither case, the 200mm lens give you the same compression of DOF as a 300mm lens. Optically, they are still different and light reacts differently in them. The way/size they are recorded does not change that.
thats wierd...............?I'm pretty sure I just got herpes looking at that photo of the motocross gate girl...
the 300 2.8, at f4, at close range, ishowd you get that shot with a f4?
He is a strong supporter of the mullet lthumbsdown:holy sh*t.
what is that kid thinking with his hair.
other than that....i like your pictures.