When is 'light' too light??
There were a few pics taken at one of the earlier world cups races that showed two seperate incidences of this same thing happening. Someone said that the rider was a tester and possibly the forks were not stock. I can totally see this as a possibility once, but twice?
and now ....
This photo is from the Worlds.
Makes me think that maybe that magical minimum weight limit might have been reached.
Don't really mean for this to be a boxxer bash, more of a questioning of the 'super light weight at all costs' trend, and this fork is sort of a flagship for this movement.
Is it worth it for the average weekend racer to save a total of a pound or two and risk this kind of thing? Best case scenario, the part is warranteed and you are only without a ride for a couple of weeks to a couple of months . Wort case...the item was used outside of 'intended use' or 'abused' and you get to purchace a brand new part. And that 10% reduction in weight will cost you 50% more $$ that the 'heavier' part.
I am not saying we all should be on 50lb bikes. 40-42 lbs can build a bomb proof bike. There is a limit to material strength, and it seems like maybe that limit is being reached within the limit of 'realistic' bicycle pricing.
just a thought...
There were a few pics taken at one of the earlier world cups races that showed two seperate incidences of this same thing happening. Someone said that the rider was a tester and possibly the forks were not stock. I can totally see this as a possibility once, but twice?
and now ....
This photo is from the Worlds.
Makes me think that maybe that magical minimum weight limit might have been reached.
Don't really mean for this to be a boxxer bash, more of a questioning of the 'super light weight at all costs' trend, and this fork is sort of a flagship for this movement.
Is it worth it for the average weekend racer to save a total of a pound or two and risk this kind of thing? Best case scenario, the part is warranteed and you are only without a ride for a couple of weeks to a couple of months . Wort case...the item was used outside of 'intended use' or 'abused' and you get to purchace a brand new part. And that 10% reduction in weight will cost you 50% more $$ that the 'heavier' part.
I am not saying we all should be on 50lb bikes. 40-42 lbs can build a bomb proof bike. There is a limit to material strength, and it seems like maybe that limit is being reached within the limit of 'realistic' bicycle pricing.
just a thought...