I say the war is a distraction from the economy and the deficit caused by massive tax cuts, against a conveniently weak dictator who we gave weapons of mass destruction to, so the nation will have loyalty to a commander-in-chief whose military record consists of a few years in a high class air force party division yet still has spotty attendance record, who became president with the most celver and ruthless campaign operation in history, and is succeding in gaining the majority support, a president who is taking care some family business, whose "former" companies have massive stake in the out-come of the war, which has no real objectives at all. I sure am confused.