Quantcast

Thoughts On SAINT

WhoRyder

Turbo Monkey
Nov 28, 2007
1,834
0
NYC
I was thinking of upgrading to all Saints...

SAINT Cranks (Right now i have Profiles Cranks)


Saint Brakes (Right now I have AVID Codes)


Saint Derailure and Shifter.... (Right now i have Sram X9's)




thoughts?
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
86,010
24,561
media blackout
I love the brakes. I love the cranks. I have 2 sets of both, tho not the '09 stuff. Supposedly its lighter and better.

edit: about the brakes, they've got plenty of power, ample modulation, not sure about the exact weight, but they're not tanks. Price wise I'd say they're the best bang for the buck, and its also pretty easy to get replacement parts for them.

I would keep your sram stuff unless you have regularly bust deraillers.
 

WhoRyder

Turbo Monkey
Nov 28, 2007
1,834
0
NYC
Actually i snapped a Hanger, but the Derailure did not even budge.... I guess if it ain;t broke, don;t try to fix it..... but i def want new cranks and new brakes
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,083
6,003
borcester rhymes
I would get new cranks for sure, but keep your codes unless you're really dissatisfied. The codes I've felt were very solid and easily adjustable. I don't think there's an inherent advantage to running saints. They're still split caliper, two piston setup. If your codes are really that bad, then swap, but it seems to me like you'd be moving laterally rather than up.

I don't see any reason to swap shifters unless yours are not pretty enough. Replace them when they break.
 

WhoRyder

Turbo Monkey
Nov 28, 2007
1,834
0
NYC
My Codes are 2 seasons OLD....

My profiles are 3 seasons....

i will keep my X9 Drivetrain.... :-)

This all depends if i get the new Boxxer (if it comes out) early next year.
 

Banshee Rider

Turbo Monkey
Jul 31, 2003
1,452
10
So far the heavy duty spring in the rear derailleur doesn't have any noticable difference over XT, and the shifting still isn't as crisp and quick as X9. I'd keep your shifter and derailleur. Can't comment on any of the other stuff.
 

Udi

RM Chief Ornithologist
Mar 14, 2005
4,915
1,200
The new saint brakes have more bite and more power than codes I felt. My finely calibrated hands would rate them as 10-12% more powerful.

The lever pivot position and lever blade shape are nicer on the codes however (as with all avid brakes), the new saints are quite far out.

Anyone else who has tried both brakes have an opinion on the power? Curious to see if others' experiences are the same as mine.
 

WhoRyder

Turbo Monkey
Nov 28, 2007
1,834
0
NYC
Just realized that the Brake Rotors isn't Bolt on....

Does the Saints have the Bolt on Rotor? I have Hadleys... i will not swap out Hubs if that is the case.
 
Last edited:
Oct 14, 2007
394
0
don't get the cranks. IMO they haven't really gone through that much of weight savings compared to last year, Incl BB the 170mm 1 Ring Saint w/ bash is 1060g. It used to be a tad less than 1200g so where talking about a weight savings of 12% or .31 lbs

the brakes look very promising and would give you more modulation which shimano's servo wave tech and the stronger return spring on the new shimano Rd would be worst looking into...I personally find you can't feel the sram clicks when shifting as much as the shimano's
 

DirtyMike

Turbo Fluffer
Aug 8, 2005
14,437
1,017
My own world inside my head
I like the new saints. More so the cranks and brakes. The drivetrains arent anything that special. The body of the rear derailer is a little tougher, but it still feels just like an XT. I Prefer Sram for shifting on my bikes, Much cleaner and crisper.
 

illflip

Monkey
Aug 20, 2007
548
0
Newark, NJ
Just realized that the Brake Rotors isn't Bolt on....

Does the Saints have the Bolt on Rotor? I have Hadleys... i will not swap out Hubs if that is the case.
im pretty sure you can get 6 bolt shimano rotors. i saw em on chainreactioncycles. they may come stock with splined though.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
24
SF, CA
don't get the cranks. IMO they haven't really gone through that much of weight savings compared to last year, Incl BB the 170mm 1 Ring Saint w/ bash is 1060g. It used to be a tad less than 1200g so where talking about a weight savings of 12% or .31 lbs
Find another place you can save 1/3 of a pound (or a 1/2 pound off the profiles). They are: tires, fork, ti spring, maaaybe wheels depending on what you're running. I'd say that's pretty significant.
 

no skid marks

Monkey
Jan 15, 2006
2,511
29
ACT Australia
I would get new cranks for sure, but keep your codes unless you're really dissatisfied. The codes I've felt were very solid and easily adjustable. I don't think there's an inherent advantage to running saints. They're still split caliper, two piston setup. If your codes are really that bad, then swap, but it seems to me like you'd be moving laterally rather than up.
Theoreticly, the Saint brakes should have more ramping up feeling like the Elixir, as the different sized pistons come out slightly different providing more power increase as the ever comes in.
You could get Elixir leves for your codes. I'm trying this now.
I don't doubt that the Shimannos are a better brake, I just managed to get the Avids cheaper, and I'm guessig they're lighter, by choice I'd probably had got the Saints.
I'd keep your profiles, get a Ti spindle if you want to save weight, but as mentioned, save weight somewhere more important like wheels.
I'd also just stick with Sram shifting.
 
Oct 14, 2007
394
0
both shimano/sram have though of a way of increasing the ramp up in their own different ways: Shimano uses the lever pivot displacement with their servo wave when sram uses the bore system of the MC do achieve something similar
 

Cave Dweller

Monkey
May 6, 2003
993
0
I tried the new saint derailleur. Sucked into the hype.

Did not like it at all.

I could not get the thing set up properly, even with the limit screws backed all the way out on both hi and low i could not get it to shift all 9 gears, best i could get was 8. Im no n00b either and know how to work on bikes. Why would they design something with the hi / low limits so close to the ends of the 1st and 9th gear? And the tension is held by the chain. Finally, i bent the thing first ride, the cage got mangled. Frankly i hated it and wasted good money on it.

Went back to my old trusty 3 year old m952 xtr, no worries.
 

klunky

Turbo Monkey
Oct 17, 2003
1,078
6
Scotland
Whilst Im sure you know how to set up gears - Shimano dont design derailleurs that dont work. Perhpas you had a dodgy one? I have one on my bike that has been perfect.
 

RaID

Turbo Monkey
another very happy user of the
original Saint Cranks and Brakes

if that is anything to go by, the new models will be very good

Im especially happy with the original brakes especially with
goodridge lines and goodridge sintered pads, they have been bomb proof
providing great feel and power.
 

Huck Banzai

Turbo Monkey
May 8, 2005
2,523
23
Transitory
DO IT!

New toys, lighten things up, and you can keep spare parts if you like to do stuff like that!

(Ill buy your Straitline levers if that winds up an option!! - already have the codes!)
 
Last edited:

Dogboy

Turbo Monkey
Apr 12, 2004
3,209
584
Durham, NC
Whilst Im sure you know how to set up gears - Shimano dont design derailleurs that dont work. Perhpas you had a dodgy one? I have one on my bike that has been perfect.
Agreed. Mine installed like any other derailleur I have ever used. Sounds like a fluke to me.
 

vinny4130

Monkey
Jun 11, 2007
454
215
albuquerque
i just rode a 09 giant glory dh w/saint and the brakes are super powerful, so much i don't think i would need 200mm front rotor (the back was 180). but i was surprised that i liked my clapped out x9 better. sram has a more positive shift and the derailleur was loud; it slaps on the gold tab.
 

Ian Collins

Turbo Monkey
Oct 4, 2001
1,428
0
Pacific Beach, San Diego, CA
i would get the cranks for SURE....they are sick.....

but your code breaks are fine, and i'm pretty sure they're lighter than the saints.....

X9 works fine too, so unless your stuff is beat, and you're curious about something more durable(but heavier) then keep the X9.....
 

Udi

RM Chief Ornithologist
Mar 14, 2005
4,915
1,200
I tried the new saint derailleur. Sucked into the hype. Did not like it at all. Went back to my old trusty 3 year old m952 xtr, no worries.
If you're looking for an upgrade, I'd recommend the dura-ace mechs. I've been running the 7800-SS (short) for the last two years and a tonne of races, and it has been great.

I changed over from a 952 of many years, and the dura-ace is lighter, gives snappier shifts thanks to a much stiffer spring, and the shorter cage stays out of the way. Pretty much an improvement in every way. Rollamajig makes it perfect.
 

DirtyMike

Turbo Fluffer
Aug 8, 2005
14,437
1,017
My own world inside my head
If you're looking for an upgrade, I'd recommend the dura-ace mechs. I've been running the 7800-SS (short) for the last two years and a tonne of races, and it has been great.

I changed over from a 952 of many years, and the dura-ace is lighter, gives snappier shifts thanks to a much stiffer spring, and the shorter cage stays out of the way. Pretty much an improvement in every way. Rollamajig makes it perfect.


Man am I happy to hear you say that. I catch so much crap for recomanding those to people that are eating up teh cable housing on there rear loop who run shimano derailers Set up right, they really do work wonders
 

DirtMcGirk

<b>WAY</b> Dumber than N8 (to the power of ten alm
Feb 21, 2008
6,379
1
Oz
I have Saint on everything I own.

Morewood DJ: Saint cranks/brakes.
Yeti 303: Cranks and soon the 2009 stoppers
Nomad: Cranks and brakes.
Titus Moto-lite: Cranks and stoppers.

They are the best, easy to work on, easy to find parts, and they work like champs.
 

Sverre

Monkey
Aug 26, 2004
400
0
Norwaii
Rode the new Saint for a day this summer, and liked it alot. What I especialy noticed was the brakes. Holy cow, those babies are powerful! I rode'em on a 09 Kona Supreme DH. The brakes have the best bite and modulation I've ever tested. (I've got both the old saints and Avids on my own bikes). For the rest of the parts I didn't notis it much. That means it works good I guess.
Personally I wouldn't made Saint my first pick due to it's somewhat hi weigth. I'm a weenie I know :)
 

DirtMcGirk

<b>WAY</b> Dumber than N8 (to the power of ten alm
Feb 21, 2008
6,379
1
Oz
Worrying about weight on a DH bike makes about as much sense to me as worrying your O2 mask doesn't work on a jet plane going into a mountain side.
 

tuumbaq

Monkey
Jul 5, 2006
725
0
Squamish BC
Worrying about weight on a DH bike makes about as much sense to me as worrying your O2 mask doesn't work on a jet plane going into a mountain side.

non sense, where have you been for the last 5 years, under a rock???

That being said there's other, better places to shed some weight off your bike.The new Saints are amazing and I wouldnt hesitate for a second running them on my bike.
 

jcaramia

Monkey
Oct 28, 2007
914
0
Clifton, NJ
I have only ridden the cranks and they are amazing. Fairly light, strong as hell, and easy to install/remove. Go for the cranks Dave!
 

WhoRyder

Turbo Monkey
Nov 28, 2007
1,834
0
NYC
I have only ridden the cranks and they are amazing. Fairly light, strong as hell, and easy to install/remove. Go for the cranks Dave!

def. getting cranks...... i'm on the fence with the brakes... keeping my Sram Drivetrain...
 

Sov

Chimp
Jan 1, 2008
73
19
Adelaide, Australia
The new mech feels good, but the shifter doesn't, feel "cheap" somehow, and hard to change gears, not pressed(on a showq bike on the Shimano stand, local bike show)
I agree, I'm not a fan of the Saint shifter either. I reckon the Saint derailleur and a M970 XTR shifter would be the way to go. I run a M770 XT shifter with a Saint derailleur but wish I had the XTR...