i'd say u were absolutely correct about that.This is the greatest moment in American history in my lifetime.
No joke, no exaggeration, no sarcasm.
This is the best.
The oven bakes best when turned on.....hang on, I just turned the news on.
Congrats!
I'd only just woken up...The oven bakes best when turned on.
:biggrin:
Oh...I'd only just woken up...
Good news for you yanks however.
You are a sad person...really man I hope you don't have a wife and kids yet. You need to do some growing up and educating yourself about how the world works. If you believed you are f'd... then guess what... you are. Talk like "totally, totally f'd" just makes you sound like a dip sh*t (I'm not sayin' that you are... I don't know you but this is the impression you give off). I wish you the best with getting "F'd".This election makes me barf. totally discussed.
Pelosi, Reid and now Barak "done nothin" Obama.
We are totally, totally F'd.
I agree, we certainly discussed f*ck out of it here!This election makes me barf. totally discussed.
nice personal attack.
I just know that generally speaking, the truth lies in the opposite direction of the masses.
When the Washington establishment loves him, the media loves him and the international likes of Hugo Chaves loves him ... he ain't the right choice for America.
I couldn't care less about issues like abortion or gay marriage. Honestly, being that he is young, in his 40's, and associating with people like Wright, I just hope he has enough true American patriotism and enough American history to guide and fight for our best interest when it comes to international issues like free trade with China, border security with Mexico and make the right decision when it comes to the middle east and energy policy. I just think he is too loved and too popular with all the wrong people to make the true decisions and are usually unpopular.
I hope i am wrong.
Basically, whether you're a dem or a rep, this country needs an as$hole running the country to force us to be fiscally responsible, demand fair trade (or heaven forbid have unfair trade to the benefit to the USA) and guard our national security (military, energy ETC)
So from this perspective, i think Obama was the riskier candidate.
Pretty sure you mean he isn't right for middle america; but then again, even some of them liked him. The metropolitain areas certainly like him and believe he is the right choice. A leader with the support of his people IS the right choice, no matter what outside opinions are.When the Washington establishment loves him, the media loves him and the international likes of Hugo Chaves loves him ... he ain't the right choice for America.
I don't know what to say about this.nice personal attack.
I just know that generally speaking, the truth lies in the opposite direction of the masses.
When the Washington establishment loves him, the media loves him and the international likes of Hugo Chaves loves him ... he ain't the right choice for America.
I couldn't care less about issues like abortion or gay marriage. Honestly, being that he is young, in his 40's, and associating with people like Wright, I just hope he has enough true American patriotism and enough American history to guide and fight for our best interest when it comes to international issues like free trade with China, border security with Mexico and make the right decision when it comes to the middle east and energy policy. I just think he is too loved and too popular with all the wrong people to make the true decisions and are usually unpopular.
I hope i am wrong.
Basically, whether you're a dem or a rep, this country needs an as$hole running the country to force us to be fiscally responsible, demand fair trade (or heaven forbid have unfair trade to the benefit to the USA) and guard our national security (military, energy ETC)
So from this perspective, i think Obama was the riskier candidate.
I have always felt a certain respect for McCain over an issue like this. So what does he do during this campaign against Obama?In South Carolina, Bush Republicans were facing an opponent who was popular for his straight talk and Vietnam war record. They knew that if McCain won in South Carolina, he would likely win the nomination. With few substantive differences between Bush and McCain, the campaign was bound to turn personal. The situation was ripe for a smear.
It didn't take much research to turn up a seemingly innocuous fact about the McCains: John and his wife, Cindy, have an adopted daughter named Bridget. Cindy found Bridget at Mother Theresa's orphanage in Bangladesh, brought her to the United States for medical treatment, and the family ultimately adopted her. Bridget has dark skin.
Anonymous opponents used "push polling" to suggest that McCain's Bangladeshi born daughter was his own, illegitimate black child. In push polling, a voter gets a call, ostensibly from a polling company, asking which candidate the voter supports. In this case, if the "pollster" determined that the person was a McCain supporter, he made statements designed to create doubt about the senator.
Thus, the "pollsters" asked McCain supporters if they would be more or less likely to vote for McCain if they knew he had fathered an illegitimate child who was black. In the conservative, race-conscious South, that's not a minor charge. We had no idea who made the phone calls, who paid for them, or how many calls were made. Effective and anonymous: the perfect smear campaign.
Some aspects of this smear were hardly so subtle. Bob Jones University professor Richard Hand sent an e-mail to "fellow South Carolinians" stating that McCain had "chosen to sire children without marriage." It didn't take long for mainstream media to carry the charge. CNN interviewed Hand and put him on the spot: "Professor, you say that this man had children out of wedlock. He did not have children out of wedlock." Hand replied, "Wait a minute, that's a universal negative. Can you prove that there aren't any?"
You can believe whatever you want about Obama. The problems we have today are no one's fault but our own. There have been lots of words bandied like terrorist and patriot.Seven years later, who is running McCain's South Carolina campaign? Charlie Condon, the former State Attorney General who in 2000 helped spread the innuendo targeting Bridget. If you can't beat them, hire them--even if they've launched racist attacks against your own daughter.
Obama ran an impressively organized, well executed, inspired and honorable campaign. I'm guessing that he can do the same for this country.People claim that Obama has no experience. Well, one thing I judge all the candidates on is how they ran their campaigns. How much money did raise and where it came from, what was their strategy and how it was executed, how they dealt with attacks, and the process of choosing a running mate.
Obama ran an enormously successful campaign considering his lack of renown and experience and the huge hurdle of racism he would face. McCain ran a so-so campaign, resorting to tactics he swore not to use and hurt him personally before.
I'd say being of [way] above average intelligence and temperment is a much better start than someone who is a complete ****ing moron like Bush or Palin. And "experience" doesn't count much if that experience is nothing but a long line of ****-ups that leave us with things like a 10 trillion dollar deficit, a shattered economy, a battered infrastructure, an endless war, and a world that universally despises us. I'll take a pass on that kind of "experience"."done nothin" Obama.
nice personal attack.
I just know that generally speaking, the truth lies in the opposite direction of the masses.
When the Washington establishment loves him, the media loves him and the international likes of Hugo Chaves loves him ... he ain't the right choice for America.
I couldn't care less about issues like abortion or gay marriage. Honestly, being that he is young, in his 40's, and associating with people like Wright, I just hope he has enough true American patriotism and enough American history to guide and fight for our best interest when it comes to international issues like free trade with China, border security with Mexico and make the right decision when it comes to the middle east and energy policy. I just think he is too loved and too popular with all the wrong people to make the true decisions and are usually unpopular.
I hope i am wrong.
Basically, whether you're a dem or a rep, this country needs an as$hole running the country to force us to be fiscally responsible, demand fair trade (or heaven forbid have unfair trade to the benefit to the USA) and guard our national security (military, energy ETC)
So from this perspective, i think Obama was the riskier candidate.
This election makes me barf. totally discussed.
Pelosi, Reid and now Barak "done nothin" Obama.
We are totally, totally F'd.
Not sure where you have been for the last 8 years, but an asshole is what we have had. We are hated as a country and that's not the way to lead.Basically, whether you're a dem or a rep, this country needs an as$hole running the country to force us to be fiscally responsible, demand fair trade (or heaven forbid have unfair trade to the benefit to the USA) and guard our national security (military, energy ETC)
So from this perspective, i think Obama was the riskier candidate.
Border security, eh? Free trade?nice personal attack.
I just know that generally speaking, the truth lies in the opposite direction of the masses.
When the Washington establishment loves him, the media loves him and the international likes of Hugo Chaves loves him ... he ain't the right choice for America.
I couldn't care less about issues like abortion or gay marriage. Honestly, being that he is young, in his 40's, and associating with people like Wright, I just hope he has enough true American patriotism and enough American history to guide and fight for our best interest when it comes to international issues like free trade with China, border security with Mexico and make the right decision when it comes to the middle east and energy policy. I just think he is too loved and too popular with all the wrong people to make the true decisions and are usually unpopular.
I hope i am wrong.
Basically, whether you're a dem or a rep, this country needs an as$hole running the country to force us to be fiscally responsible, demand fair trade (or heaven forbid have unfair trade to the benefit to the USA) and guard our national security (military, energy ETC)
So from this perspective, i think Obama was the riskier candidate.
Well said.McCain tried to win an election and Obama sought to win the people, which he did.
Crap that reminds me, I need to pay the hosting bill.Well said.
Also, where's your site? I wanna send you money.