That right there is the reason 4X sucks for me both as a spectator and a rider. I only ride the bmx track (on a cruiser) to work on pumping and being smooth. I'm not a gate monster - I always caught up by being smooth and picking good lines and being aggressive in the corners. I don't know if I ever got the jump on anyone, lol, but I felt like most times I had a chance.Who wants to watch a race that is over in the first turn?
That was fun. Big 4x course for the pros and fun DS course for us regular joes.The only exception to this was the Supercross (I mean 4x) at Wisconsin in 2002.
Metal Dude
That looks awesome. I am sure you put a ton of effort into building that. Is that in Georgia?
Made me feel a little better to see you guys looking "mortal" out there.Wisconsin was my favorite course ever in 4x even though there wasn't much passing. A few pros got heli rides to the hospital.
You could tell almost all the big names even had there butt clinched there.
I just remember before practice, Cedric -while doing a front wheel balance on TOP of the gate looking back at us and saying "We are all Pussies if we donot jump everything first run"
And then he was the only one who did it, pinned - incredible
I played it very smart and took the entire practice to hit everything, lastly that step-up coming down off the hill.
Guess I'm a puss - but in one piece....
out comes the stickWell hell, there we go, he is a legend right?
.
on guard!.........lol.......hows your daughter?Out comes the defender
Forget the words. That picture settles the debate.DS rules....
The real reason DS rules!!! "Mano e Mano" Duel to the death.Forget the words. That picture settles the debate.
yeah, that was the raddest 4x course everThat was fun. Big 4x course for the pros and fun DS course for us regular joes.
aha that old pic rules, I'm here...I just don't race much anymore, more jumping and all that fun stuff. I think I lost interest in racing mtbs because of what is being discussed. I too thought 4x had a bright future, but then the courses went back in time and jumps disappeared (by jumps I mean real jumps aka: over 20ft). O well, there will always be big dirtjumpsClassic pic. Is Lolli still riding/racing?
I don't disagree about Jeep KOM. I am usually busy on the weekends so I have only seen one (I think San Luis Obispo), and it looked kinda lame.As for Jeep, Xgames, etc....
The jeep races provide more prize money, more support (they pay expenses) than any other MTB event ever had, it has cbs/sunday/afternoon air times....has all these great things going for it. And yet if you ask the riders behind closed doors-they say the jeep races are usually the lamest thing they ever have done (in regards to the format, tracks). But they all go to them for cash and prizes, oh and get on TV which the sponsors love. The whole Jeep race debacle has been discussed in here at length, do a search.
I think what I am trying to say is the Jeep races have done nothing to increase MTB awareness, get more sponsors for the sport, get more riders racing bikes, etc....
again, my disclaimer
I am old and clueless about bike racing.
Come on, Biker Sherlock (sp?) rules.In regards to the Xgames stuff, here is something to chew on, Chris from espn (marketing bigwig) told me the tv ratings and 'buzz' for bmx dirtjumping and bmx supercross events at xgames were as bad as street luge...meaning, it was not popular with the masses.
but, but, but....growing the sport! exactly what you said, we don't need big media to think we're cool......we're cool regardless of tv coverage, and frankly, I'd rather keep it that way, we don't need even more asshats getting into the sport.....The last thing the mtb industry needs is the x-games. It'll mean a little bit of extra cash from outside industry sponsors for a couple of years, and then when x-games exposure is gone, we'll have a bunch of riders and race-team budgets that are dry-humped as they will have "grown" to rely on the money.
Let's just accept the fact that bike racing is just too real, and too good to be marketable to nitwit teenagers. The only TV coverage anyone should really be worrying about, IMO is for the WorldCup. better distribution of worldcup coverage will mean a real, and more sustainable increases in wages.
Let's not re-invent the sport so it can be used to enlist Marines and sell Slim-Jims.
Of course you dont, you will probably never attend a world cup for a race, but for the riders that "outgrow" the fierce competition (sarcasm) it is a little tough to train for a world cup 4X by clunking down a half ass built ds course on the east coast. That prepares you for 4X as much as taking a dump.I don't care too much if it doesn't prepare people for world cups as well.
The reason why OLN stopped show the nationals was because NORBA didn't want to buck up the $25k per hour for TV coverage anymore. Basically, Norba was able to sell the commercials but had to make the upfront investment and commit to the airtime.I I agree that World Cups being televised would be a lot more legit
representation of "what we do" but, If television coverage could help grow the sport to be big enough to warrant "Real" courses, why not?
OLN was doing a good job of covering Nat.s before - presumably our governing body ran them off!
Exactly. I don't plan on racing any world cups and neither do 95% of the people racing. I'd rather build something that those 95% could have more fun and value with than prepare that 5% for world cups.Of course you dont, you will probably never attend a world cup for a race, but for the riders that "outgrow" the fierce competition (sarcasm) it is a little tough to train for a world cup 4X by clunking down a half ass built ds course on the east coast. That prepares you for 4X as much as taking a dump.