actually it was really hot and the linkage was dripping :devil:kidwoo said:Looks like a stretched out piece of gum actuating the shock link.
See that thin piece of metal between the shock link on top and the swingarm? As the swingarm moves, it pulls the piece of metal down which actuates the shock link.MMcG said:high bb, short chainstays.......can someone explain how the suspension works on that frame though?
Is this their 5" trail bike prototype?
damn - too bad you didn't get some close up shots.
binary visions said:See that thin piece of metal between the shock link on top and the swingarm? As the swingarm moves, it pulls the piece of metal down which actuates the shock link.
Kind of a silly design if you ask me.. Can't for the life of me figure out why they'd do it except for looks??
It's like the Evil Empire linkage... reverse-moto linkage? something of that nature...MMcG said:high bb, short chainstays.......can someone explain how the suspension works on that frame though?
Is this their 5" trail bike prototype?
damn - too bad you didn't get some close up shots.
I just can't see any benifit... Swingarm path is going to be the exact same as a single pivot. It's not like it put the shock particularly low in the frame to achieve a low CoG. Progressiveness could be achieved through a standard swing link.MMcG said:Seems kind of complicated to me - not sure what the benefit would be for that type of design - but hell - for all we know it could be a very early prototype or something
syadasti said:Benefits look to be full length seat tube and adjustable geometry...
No full length seattube - look at that upper swing link. Right through the seat tube.syadasti said:Benefits look to be full length seat tube and adjustable geometry...
binary visions said:Ahh well. Internet speculation based on a who-knows-what-stage-in-development frame that's not even available yet
Just throwing around my 2 cents!
as far as i know, its VERY early in the design stage -- frank pretty much built that prototype 2 days before the nationals at Snow, so the frame itself is very new but he's been working the suspension design for a while -- like, years. so i imagine things will get tweaked and perfected as the Sinister guys ride the piss out of it. i'm looking forward to the shorter travel (3.5 - 4") soooo much :love:binary visions said:No full length seattube - look at that upper swing link. Right through the seat tube.
There are easier ways to adjust geometry...
Ahh well. Internet speculation based on a who-knows-what-stage-in-development frame that's not even available yet
Just throwing around my 2 cents!
3.5 -4"??Mumbles said:as far as i know, its VERY early in the design stage -- frank pretty much built that prototype 2 days before the nationals at Snow, so the frame itself is very new but he's been working the suspension design for a while -- like, years. so i imagine things will get tweaked and perfected as the Sinister guys ride the piss out of it. i'm looking forward to the shorter travel (3.5 - 4") soooo much :love:
i dont know for sure -- what i've heard from credible sources is a 3.5-4" short and a 6" long version, so it may just have been bumped down. i bet we'll find out soon though!MMcG said:3.5 -4"??
latest I heard was a 5" trail bike and a 7" fr bike....is the 3.5-4 incher an add on?
Mumbles said:i dont know for sure -- what i've heard from credible sources is a 3.5-4" short and a 6" long version, so it may just have been bumped down. i bet we'll find out soon though!
It sure looks itBldr_Freerider said:It's like the Evil Empire linkage... reverse-moto linkage? something of that nature...
That's what us internet bikers/engineers are here for.Ridge_Rider said:we will keep you posted and thanks for challanging me to impress you.. F
Do you still ride it....ispookydave said:Frank,
That was a great reply! Just so you know my Project X is still going strong.
Dave Bottomley