Quantcast

2Stage Bikes (Dual Shock)

julian_dh

Monkey
Jan 10, 2005
813
0
wow is there anywhere to get info on that lahar it looks sick................... but very very dangerous
 

xy9ine

Turbo Monkey
Mar 22, 2004
2,940
353
vancouver eastside
apparently the previous lahars were pretty bomber. some really cool carbon forming going on there, regardless. i want one, even if it doesnt work - reminds me of my old trimble:
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,086
6,018
borcester rhymes
what the hell? am i having a seizure, or does 7/8 posts have nothing to do with the main topic?


i'm very interested in buying one, but they only come in small and medium, and the copper is pretty ugly. plus they come with rs air shocks, and i feel that for dh you really need some good compression adjustable shocks.
 

julian_dh

Monkey
Jan 10, 2005
813
0
well man the bike is designed to work with air shocks so i dont see why there would be any problems, they have been using them since day 1
 

SlackBoy

Monkey
Apr 1, 2002
190
0
Wellington, New Zealand
sayndesyn said:
wouldn't you destroy that bike the first big rock you nailed with the rear wheel that is bigger than a foot or so? Looks like a horrible flaw unless the bike is just for xtreme singletrack:rolleyes:
Cameron Cole will be rocking one of those at a few Euro races I believe before he comes home and Gets either Silver or Gold in Juniors at the worlds, If he gets Silver, that ok cos it'll be another Kiwi getting the gold anyways.
 

Banga

Monkey
Sep 7, 2001
362
11
Wellington, New Zealand
DHCorky said:
What kind of drivetrain does that bike run? The only drivetrain part I can see in the picture is a left side crank arm.
Roholff hub in the frame, been that way since about 99.
but that one pictured isnt completely built, which is why you cant see a chain etc.
 

ridiculous

Turbo Monkey
Jan 18, 2005
2,907
1
MD / NoVA
its gonna be one interesting chain line.

I dont know a whole lot about dual stage bikes nor do i know alot about air shocks but this is the 2 cents of thought that went through my head after i saw those bikes.

1. why two shocks, air shocks at that. there are plenty of bikes on the market now that get 8-10" of travel on a single shock. and at NZ$ 2663.00 plus G.S.T. for the dual stage you could probably get one of the other comparable bikes. sounds like less crap to break and easier to service

2. 2 shocks could provide a ton of adjustability
 

BRM

Chimp
Apr 30, 2006
23
0
Has anyone actually seen one on a trail or race course? Nice too see some engineering going on but lets see it in action.
 

zedro

Turbo Monkey
Sep 14, 2001
4,144
1
at the end of the longest line
ridiculous said:
1. why two shocks, air shocks at that. there are plenty of bikes on the market now that get 8-10" of travel on a single shock.
using two shocks has nothing to do with travel, rather it has a variable axle path using a 6 bar linkage; with 6 bars you need two shocks. They obviously werent interested in making just another 8-10" travel rig...
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,086
6,018
borcester rhymes
It's not the air, it's the lack of adjustability/low end rockshox quality that bothers me. These are DH rigs, I feel like only the best suspension is going to be good enough (ie cane creek, DT Swiss).
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,086
6,018
borcester rhymes
also, they've been really good about replying to my emails, but the first run of frames is mostly gone. I'll be anxious to see what kind of early run issues they bump into.

PS, the price comes out to about 1800 US, less shipping and import fees, which is a killer deal. I think it's about 1900 with a floater.
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,101
1,153
NC
RaID said:
i too would like to see more of the drivetrain and how it works

good to see someone throwing something completely else in the ballpark
It's just a frame-mounted Rohloff, under all that carbon.

A few years ago I was on a lift @ Mt. Snow with a guy who had one, IIRC it looked a little more boxy so it might have been an older model. He said it wasn't really any great shakes, but he liked to ride something different so he bought it.

I can't imagine riding something with a piece of linkage hanging down like that. Maybe I'm just a hack, but I'm sure I'd destroy it, unless you ran a ginormous bashguard.
 

dhpimp

Monkey
Mar 23, 2005
151
0
MILFS BEDROOM
I love these 2-stage bikes. Been looking into them for a while.The two shocks make a lot of sense for long travel application (8+").

2 pivots, 2 small shocks that still give you a good leverage ratio - less than 3:1.

My only concern would be that it looks like you have to bottom out the top shock in order to activate the lower shock. You'd end up having to service that upper shock quite frequently. Hrmmm.....

Anyone have any experience on these? The concept is to have a stable platform bike based on design, but on their Elite9 they use a Swinger 4-way w/SPV ?? Too many questions...
 

Bicyclist

Turbo Monkey
Apr 4, 2004
10,152
2
SB
dhpimp said:
I love these 2-stage bikes. Been looking into them for a while.The two shocks make a lot of sense for long travel application (8+").

2 pivots, 2 small shocks that still give you a good leverage ratio - less than 3:1.

My only concern would be that it looks like you have to bottom out the top shock in order to activate the lower shock. You'd end up having to service that upper shock quite frequently. Hrmmm.....

Anyone have any experience on these? The concept is to have a stable platform bike based on design, but on their Elite9 they use a Swinger 4-way w/SPV ?? Too many questions...
I've *heard* the top shock doesn't bottom too much. But the last thing I want while railing a corner or in the middle of a rockgarden is my first shock to bottom and get all thrown off line.

Pointless IMO.
 

ragin-sagin

Monkey
Oct 2, 2003
390
0
NZ
I have never ridden a 2-stage but I have met a few guys that own them and they raved about the ride. The built up ones were bloody light too. Of course people loved proflex's in 1996 too...
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,101
1,153
NC
I actually hadn't looked that the 2stage website before, got distracted by that Lahar, but I'm not sure they understand the purpose of having two shocks :think:

The 2 stages like they indicate are, IMO, stupid. You don't want the second shock setup super hard and the first shock setup super soft, so that they activate one after the other. You want them to work in harmony so that they provide that "area" of suspension travel instead of just a path. That allows them to react to impacts in all directions.

Either they don't understand the purpose or they are doing themselves a great disservice by not relating the genuine purpose to the people reading the website. Having the initial one soft is a great way to blow it up by constantly bottoming it - as was brought up.

By the way, what the hell does this mean:

The 2Stage suspension system (international patents pending) is a stable platform design - derived mechanically,
Are they implying that their suspension design actually has a stable platform built in? :rolleyes:

If everyone riding these 2 stage bikes has them set up like the website wants you to, MHO is that they're raving about it just because it's new and different and everyone wants to like the different technology they just bought into.
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,086
6,018
borcester rhymes
i didn't quite understand that myself. switching from their "stable platform" to a travel area is as simple as changing air pressures though. I would probably set the bottom shock (rearward) with just a slightly higher air pressure and compression damping, so as to make it slightly more progressive.

interesting bike but i really wish i could try before you buy...
 

zedro

Turbo Monkey
Sep 14, 2001
4,144
1
at the end of the longest line
binary visions said:
Are they implying that their suspension design actually has a stable platform built in? :rolleyes:
i guess they are trying to say the 'primary linkage' (or the 4 bar portion) is design around good pedalling and the 'secondary' (the extra 2 bars to make six) when activated is for the bighit duties. Of course high single pivots do this with only one bar :clue:

What confuses me is when Cannondale had their six bar like these guys, everyone shat on it, the pros didnt like it and it disapeared. Bring it back years later and its the ****?
 

ÆX

Turbo Monkey
Sep 8, 2001
4,920
17
NM
binary visions said:
I

The 2 stages like they indicate are, IMO, stupid. You don't want the second shock setup super hard and the first shock setup super soft, so that they activate one after the other. You want them to work in harmony so that they provide that "area" of suspension travel instead of just a path. That allows them to react to impacts in all directions.

.
the best thing about having two shocks is the "AREA".

but there is no rerason the owner could not just match the spring rates and get a area amount of travel.

alex
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,086
6,018
borcester rhymes
zedro said:
What confuses me is when Cannondale had their six bar like these guys, everyone shat on it, the pros didnt like it and it disapeared. Bring it back years later and its the ****?

are you refering to the gemini or the fulcrum? The gemini used a low pivot and then a rearward attachment....the problem was that it would lock out under braking and pedaling, so where it would be most effective (steep chutes), it couldn't work (dragging brakes). I think the two-stage remedies this with a high roller and a floating linkage. Does it work? Ask BCD.

I've got to agree on one level though, I would rather see a vertical axle path and then a rearward axle path for maximum shock absorbtion. The problem is making it pedal.
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,101
1,153
NC
bcd said:
the best thing about having two shocks is the "AREA".

but there is no rerason the owner could not just match the spring rates and get a area amount of travel.

alex
Right. Exactly. So look at the "how it works" section of the website - why would they tell everyone that they should be setting up the two shocks to work in two stages (also, incidentally, the name of the company)?

Do they not understand the concept, or are they just not relaying it to the public?
 

WheelieMan

Monkey
Feb 6, 2003
937
0
kol-uh-RAD-oh
binary visions said:
Right. Exactly. So look at the "how it works" section of the website - why would they tell everyone that they should be setting up the two shocks to work in two stages (also, incidentally, the name of the company)?

Do they not understand the concept, or are they just not relaying it to the public?
Yeah I have always found it interesting, that not once is an area of travel mentioned on their website. I have a feeling that they are so caught up in their "Stable Platform" that they don't realize any possible advantages from running similar pressures in both shocks to allow for the area of travel.

I'm still having a hard time seeing this "stable platform". If the bike is set up to have a specific axle-path like in the animated GIF on their website, then the bike will behave just like any low-medium pivot under pedaling. What happens in the second half of the travel is really irrelevant for pedaling, so I see no reason for two-stages. (as advertised by the company) There is quite a bit of information on the website, yet there is still no explanation for how this "stable platform" actually works...
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,101
1,153
NC
WheelieMan said:
I see no reason for two-stages. (as advertised by the company)
Well, there would be an advantage of a pretty huge range of adjustability, since you can seperately tune the first and second parts of the travel with the full adjustability of the shock.

But I don't think they understand their own design, or if they do, they're choosing to market it in a different way - and a way that seems silly to me, not to mention being essentially incorrect.
 

WheelieMan

Monkey
Feb 6, 2003
937
0
kol-uh-RAD-oh
binary visions said:
Well, there would be an advantage of a pretty huge range of adjustability, since you can seperately tune the first and second parts of the travel with the full adjustability of the shock.
True, there would be slightly better adjustability of travel, but even this is not mentioned anywhere in the 2-stage info (as far as I can tell).

Despite the strange marketing tactics, I still really like the bike. Sub 2k isn't bad for a bike of that caliber, and the two shocks would allow the rider to vary the wheelpath pretty dramatically. Pretty interesting.
 

Punter

Chimp
May 8, 2006
54
0
Re: Lahar

The pictures shown there are of my bike.

I also have the model before this one DHV M8. I've raced the bike to two top fives in the NZ national series and 8th last season, although I was injured the whole season.

My last Lahar was raced for Lahar by 3 riders before I got it. In total it has raced 7 full seasons of pro elite level racing. Including world cup 04, canada 03. The swing arm that some wrote thinking will snap like a twig is the same one that has been on the bike since new. The old model has a alloy rocker(the M9 has carbon plates). This is the only part of the bike that has partly failed. It has two hairline cracks.

The mainframe has been raped for 7 seasons and is still competitive at the highest level.

The bike rides better than any other bike I've ever ridden and it doesnt break like every other bike I've owned.

The new one is awesome. I test rode the first of the new models and it was an improvement on an already wicked bike.

Those rockers raise when the suspension compresses, and they are higher than the old model, and i very rarely hit the hold rockers.

I cant wait to get the new one(pictured) fully built up. just need some minor bits and its a runner. For those of you who are interested you can buy a new framset as shown in the picture for $5500NZD. This gets you -Frame, rohloff, cranks/drivetrain, rear hub. A hand built carbon DH bike for $5500... not much. they rule

you can email me if you want any further details on lahar at whosdaddy2@gmail.com

peace out
Punter