no deets given - pb is supposed to have info up at some point...awesome. any deets? travel, weight, stanchions size? less flexy than a shiver? this is about as exciting as that Thomson dropper post.
Yup, single crown inverted forks make no functional sense.Probably teh flexy
Yes, I thought that was a known fact already.Yup, single crown inverted forks make no functional sense.
And yet everybody wants one. I would throw that thing on today if given a chance.Yup, single crown inverted forks make no functional sense.
LOL. I agree. I'd throw one on my Banshee Spitty in a nano second if given the chance. Travel adjust would be baller on this.And yet everybody wants one. I would throw that thing on today if given a chance.
Nope. Back in the day when the Shiver SC was discontinued nobody wanted them. You could buy a brand new one for $250 from online stores (I bought one only because it was cheap).And yet everybody wants one. I would throw that thing on today if given a chance.
The pulley/slider option is kinda cool.I thought this was pretty slick:
http://www.mtb-news.de/news/2012/08/29/eurobike-2012-mrp-g3-kettenfuehrungen/
It looks to have stanchions and uppers that have a hexagonal profile once they clear the seals. Id say it will be plenty stiff.
Under 2kg for a 160mm fork is heavy?On the heavy side for 160mm AM fork...but still looks tasty!
They already have that covered (and AM fat bikes are so niche, who cares):inverted makes sense in a market where there are 26", 650b and 29" wheels.
The Maverick inverted single crown fork was an even bigger joke than Marzocchi's.For 2013, X-Fusion have four new fork features that, when paired with their relatively affordable prices, make for a compelling offer. Namely, a 34mm chassis for 26in, 650b and 29in wheels; a friction reducing stanchion coating called Gold Slick Ano; a one-piece forged aluminum crown assembly called Uni-Crown; and a new mid-stroke damping technology called Mid-Valve.
Its also a dual crown fork, that's a big difference...Bottom Line. They are reactive, Preventive against damage, Strong and good looking! Also, my dorado is set and forget which is great!
That seems likely to be the case. This will be interesting to keep an eye on - if they do indeed have splined profiles or something on the tubes, it could be either a really good solution for stiffness, or a total disaster in terms of binding up under flex, or anywhere in between. Would be a PITA to make well toleranced upper bushings for too, unless they're machined, but I'm actually really curious to see how they go with these.It looks to have stanchions and uppers that have a hexagonal profile once they clear the seals. Id say it will be plenty stiff.
First of all, Marzocchi's 2013 line will be manufactured by Hodaka, who previously manufactured their rear shocks. Hodaka is a short term solution for Marzocchi, though, as they plan to create their own manufacturing plant and assembly line a few years down the road. Model year 2013 brings a lot of changes to Marzocchi's lineup, and they've reduced their range from 40 models to just 13. The new goal is to specialize in premium products rather than making a fork for every application.
Aside from the change in manufacturers, the 888 RC3 EVO V2 (left) gets a minor upgrade internally for 2013. Based on rider feedback from their World Cup racers, they adjusted the shim stack to help keep the fork higher in its travel over high speed chatter. Be on the lookout for a completely new downhill fork and rear shock from Marzocchi in the future...
It's a good excuse for not having a serious factory for now. That's a real bummer. Wonder what new fork they are talking about.2013 Marzocchi 888 spotted on Vital
Gives me SHIVERs.It's a good excuse for not having a serious factory for now. That's a real bummer. Wonder what new fork they are talking about.
Wasn't their old Italian factory their own? Before they moved production out to Taiwan and things started going downhill...It's a good excuse for not having a serious factory for now. That's a real bummer. Wonder what new fork they are talking about.
couldnt disagree more. since their debacle in 2008, they have been putting out great products (and now smartly reducing 40 models to 13,) have had an actual presence in the WC scene and their products are oem'd more then in the past.All in all the decisions of the marzocchi/tenneco management have been questionable. They just lost their presence everywhere and they are now further reducing it.
I know the Shiver was produced in house in Italy.Wasn't there old Italian factory their own? Before they moved production out to Taiwan and things started going downhill...
THis is armchair engineering, but I would be cautious putting those on a DH bike. I had a chance to check them out and they look like you would destroy them on the first solid rock strike.10mm pedal by wellgo:
I think you have a very short memory. Go back to 2003-2007 and see how many products from marzo were bought.couldnt disagree more. since their debacle in 2008, they have been putting out great products (and now smartly reducing 40 models to 13,) have had an actual presence in the WC scene and their products are oem'd more then in the past.
its not their fault Teneco canceled their agreement after finally producing great products.
40 models? Wut?Also the 40 models were mostly for OEM. There were too many but a large majority of them were just that.
I didn't say anything about product quality. I know first hand that it's great. If you look up the 2013 giant or commencal models at eurobike you will notice that they lost the little oem-deals they had probably because they move production. PLus they lost many pro riders and a few emplayees in the us. MS Mondraker is the only brigth spot.couldnt disagree more. since their debacle in 2008, they have been putting out great products (and now smartly reducing 40 models to 13,) have had an actual presence in the WC scene and their products are oem'd more then in the past.
its not their fault Teneco canceled their agreement after finally producing great products.
youre right, i meant Suntour for their mfging.I think you have a very short memory. Go back to 2003-2007 and see how many products from marzo were bought.
Also the 40 models were mostly for OEM. There were too many but a large majority of them were just that.
btw. Teneco cancelled their agreement? Last time I checked it was SR Suntour.