ok how much worse would the 888RT preform than the 888R.
rt has ssvf internals and the r has hscv internals
rt has ssvf internals and the r has hscv internals
888RT vs. 888R
- Thread starter Broken_Spoke
- Start date
it will perform alot worse. just like having a beefed up jr. t. it would suck. unless you only go slow.
Word. Its not worth it.
then golly gee why even make it and why did Norco put it on the A-Line bikeDHracer1067 said:
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Broken_Spoke said:
figuresbushwacker said:
they made it so the bike can be cheaper yet still look expensive, and it'd be just like a jr. t but stiffer.
Anyone- Can you replace the internals on it with the hscv internals (like putting super t internals into a jr.t...)???
Anyone- Can you replace the internals on it with the hscv internals (like putting super t internals into a jr.t...)???
zane said:
Maybe, but it would cost you a good chunk and there is no adjustability on the RT. The 888RT is a pile of steamy, steamy fork poo.
I rode a Demo9 Pro with an "888RR" on it and it felt really, really good. I took it down 2 different trails with all kinds of terrain and off of a 15' drop. I have never ridden an 888R off-road but I have test ridden them (parking lot) and they feel similar to the 888RR I rode. However I don't know for sure what internals the model I rode has (SSV or HSCV or SSVF?) compared to the 888R or 888RT. It had a rebound adjuster on the left leg and nothing on the right. I can say it felt way more active than my '03 Jr. T which kinda felt like crap! I bet a cartridge can be purchased albeit for some $$$.
