Page 4 of 17 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 254
  1. #46
    Grasshopper
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    28
    Rep Power
    2
    when the pros raced bromont the majority of them ran dry tires (minion DHF's since the butchers were not made yet). dry tires at bromont for sure. for mt. saint anne i would say butchers in the dry but if it gets wet some hillbillies would be great, especially if the dirt is still loose and hasnt hardened up too much

  2. #47
    Monkey
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    984
    Rep Power
    4
    michelin wild grip'r descent 2.5 measures 57mm knob to knob, on a 22mm internal width rim at 30psi. basically the same width and height as a 2.5 minion.

    the compound is about as hard as a 60 duro maxxis. maybe slightly firmer.

  3. #48
    Turbo Monkey rpet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Greenpoint, NY
    Posts
    1,669
    Rep Power
    5
    hmm the Miche is really that hard?
    Quote Originally Posted by norbar View Post
    ZOMG teh Carbonz gonna brake on my gnurrr.

  4. #49
    Monkey Gelbwurstbrot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Franken, Germany
    Posts
    181
    Rep Power
    5
    I would not say that Michelins are that hard
    They are for sure softer than 60a Maxxis.

  5. #50
    Monkey
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    984
    Rep Power
    4
    sorry, the 60 duro is slightly firmer than the michelin. bad typing my bad. michelin is maybe 55 on the maxxis scale, give or take, in my estimation.



    more:

    minion DHF 2.5 ST - 57mm tire width on 22mm internal rim
    minion DHF 2.7 3c - 60mm tire width on 22mm internal rim
    Last edited by marshalolson; 06-17-2011 at 03:34 PM.

  6. #51
    Grasshopper
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by zdubyadubya View Post
    Is the DH24 even made anymore?
    i believe this is now the michelin hot.
    http://www.michelinbicycletire.com/m...event=hot.view

  7. #52
    Monkey
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    253
    Rep Power
    3
    Since we're on topic of compounds.

    I have always wondered if going softest is always the best performance wise decision?

    If we disregard better rolling resistance of harder compound. What do tire monkeys have to say?

  8. #53
    Monkey Percy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Christchurch NZ
    Posts
    425
    Rep Power
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by StabprimoMonkee View Post
    Since we're on topic of compounds.

    I have always wondered if going softest is always the best performance wise decision?

    If we disregard better rolling resistance of harder compound. What do tire monkeys have to say?
    Rolling is over-rated, I loiek cornerers.

    I other words you can be as fast as a fast thing in the straights, but its irrelevant if you crash in every corner/ gnarly bit cos your tyres wont grip!

  9. #54
    Monkey
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    253
    Rep Power
    3
    @Percy: I specifically asked not to focus on rolling resistance. My question still stands.

  10. #55
    Grasshopper
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Europe, sunny side of the Alps
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0
    Great thread!

    Regarding the new Michelin Wild Grip'R Heavy Duty Descent 2.6. The newcomer has the same ERTRO (62-559) as the old DH32, but the tire is different

    Smaller/narrower.
    Less profile depth.
    Smaller knobs.
    Apparently different, harder compound too.

    So not the golden standard anymore for those who swore by it...

  11. #56
    x Jeremy R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    behind you with a snap pop
    Posts
    8,856
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by luckyluke View Post
    Great thread!

    Regarding the new Michelin Wild Grip'R Heavy Duty Descent 2.6. The newcomer has the same ERTRO (62-559) as the old DH32, but the tire is different

    Smaller/narrower.
    Less profile depth.
    Smaller knobs.
    Apparently different, harder compound too.

    So not the golden standard anymore for those who swore by it...
    Everything you just wrote is wrong.
    The 2.6 is the same size as the old comp 32. It always measured 2.6.
    And the compound is the same as the old one as well.
    The only all new tire Michelin is offering is the wildrock'r DH which comes with same compound as the rest of the DH tires.
    The one change I heard that they made is on the old comp 16's (which is now the wildgrip'r dh 2.5) is they stiffened up the outer knobs so they would not flex so much on hardpack.
    I have the 2.5 wildrock'r tires on the way, and I will comment on them after I have some runs on 'em. That tread is great on my trail tires, so I can't wait to run them with the DH compound.
    SEI Racing

  12. #57
    confused rockofullr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    East Bay, Cali
    Posts
    4,541
    Rep Power
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by BmxConvert View Post
    Decline did an issue on cutting the Clutch and Chunder tires; is that something we can get added in here as well?

    If I remember correctly there is a how to on cutting the Excavators/Nevegals as well that may be worth posting is someone knows where to find either.
    Just found this the other day.

    CUTTING MAXXIS MINIONS (R and F) FOR WET/LOOSE:

    http://www.leelikesbikes.com/cutting...-wetloose.html

  13. #58
    Turbo Monkey zdubyadubya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    1,200
    Rep Power
    3
    nice find. added to the maxxis section
    Quote Originally Posted by binary visions View Post
    It was like wiping my ass with a bunny rabbit.

  14. #59
    just shake your rump Sandwich's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    whahlthahm, MAH
    Posts
    11,360
    Rep Power
    11
    Interesting on the minion cutting. Adding that kind of spacing to the knobs kind of approaches "hillbilly"/cut spike range, doesn't it?
    Please see the DH Forum FAQ
    Here
    For questions like "What's a good trail bike for a DHer?"

  15. #60
    Celebrating No-Pants Day kidwoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    In my pants
    Posts
    15,590
    Rep Power
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by StabprimoMonkee View Post
    Since we're on topic of compounds.

    I have always wondered if going softest is always the best performance wise decision?

    If we disregard better rolling resistance of harder compound. What do tire monkeys have to say?

    If you disregard how slowly softer rubber rolls, then what is the point of wanting a tire that grips less?

    That's kind of a silly question because 90% of the reason to NOT run a stickier version of a tire is exactly that.....rolling resistance. The other 10% is squirm on hardpack or rocks but that varies wildly between tread designs. And the more companies come out with 3C like compunds that deform a little less throughout the entire knob, it's less of an issue.

    So yeah it would be great to say 'regardless of difference in rolling resistance' but that's not reality. The difference in speed between a 60d and 40d tire is huge.
    Strava: turn off your dork logger when you're not on sanctioned trails, numbnuts.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •