View Full Version : I'm a BAD AMERICAN!
Certified Drunk
06-27-2002, 12:36 AM
YES I'M A BAD AMERICAN
I am your worst Nightmare. I am a BAD American. I am Bill Lukshides.
I believe the money i make belongs to me and my family, and not some mid level governmental functionary be it Democratic or Republican!
I'm in touch with my feelings and i like it that way, damn it!
I think owning a gun doesn't make you a killer, it makes you a smart American.
I think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized , and does not entitle you to anything.
I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, try to do it in ENGLISH.
I think fireworks should be legal on the 4th of July.
I think that being a student doesn't give you any more enlightenment than working at Blockbuster. In fact, if your parents are footing the bill to put your pansy ass through 4 years plus, of college, you haven't begun to be enlightened.
I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God when and where they want to.
My heroes are John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and whoever cancels Jerry Springer.
I don't hate the rich. I don't pity the poor.
I know wrestling is fake and i don't waste my time arguing about it.
I think global warming is a big lie. Where are all those experts now, when i'm freezing my ass off during these long winters and speings and paying, paying, paying?
I've never owned a slave, or was a slave, i didn't wander forty years in the desert after getting chased out of Egypt. I haven't burned any witches or been persecuted by the Turks and neither have you! So, shut-the-hell-up already.
I want to know which church is it exactly where the Reverend Jesse Jackson practices, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution? Can i get an AMEN on that one?
I think the cops have every right to shoot you sorry ass if you're running from them.
I also think they have the right to pull your ass over in you're breaking the law, regardless of what color you are.
I think if you are too stupid to know how a ballot works, i don't want you deciding who should be running the most powerful nation in the world for the next four years.
I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me crap or trying to guilt me into making "donations" to their cause. These people should be targets.
I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes two parents.
I believe if she has her lips on your Willie, it's sex, and this applies even if you are the President of the United States.
And what the hell is going on with the gas prices... again?
If this makes me a BAD American, then yes, I'm a BAD American.
We need our country back!
GOD BLESS THE U.S.A.
RideMonkey
06-27-2002, 01:04 AM
I'm an idiot for spending time on this but here goes......
Originally posted by Certified Drunk
I believe the money i make belongs to me and my family, and not some mid level governmental functionary be it Democratic or Republican!
Do you think you make more than everyone else in the world because you are smarter or work harder than say the chinese man, the french man, or the Australian man? Nope, you make a bundle simply because you live in a rich society created by a progressive government. Quit complaining.
I'm in touch with my feelings and i like it that way, damn it!
Huh?
I think owning a gun doesn't make you a killer, it makes you a smart American.
I must be an idiot.
I think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized , and does not entitle you to anything.
Understood. Current government policies DO foster resentment towards minorities due to percieved "favoritism" of minority groups. Complex issue that can't be summarized by one line.
I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, try to do it in ENGLISH.
Give me a break.
I think fireworks should be legal on the 4th of July.
snore.
I think that being a student doesn't give you any more enlightenment than working at Blockbuster. In fact, if your parents are footing the bill to put your pansy ass through 4 years plus, of college, you haven't begun to be enlightened.
A majority of people pay for it on their own. People who did not face the hardships of financing a college education often like to belittle those that have by making these generalizations.
I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God when and where they want to.
Nope. Theres a time and place for this kind of thing.
My heroes are John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and whoever cancels Jerry Springer.
Hey everyone lets join the KKK. Pure class.
I don't hate the rich. I don't pity the poor.
The one statement worth anything in this waste of space.
I know wrestling is fake and i don't waste my time arguing about it.
OK make that two.
I think global warming is a big lie. Where are all those experts now, when i'm freezing my ass off during these long winters and speings and paying, paying, paying?
True or not, what do you armchair scientists know about it?
I've never owned a slave, or was a slave, i didn't wander forty years in the desert after getting chased out of Egypt. I haven't burned any witches or been persecuted by the Turks and neither have you! So, shut-the-hell-up already.
Some merit here. Some people do like to blame their lack of achievment in life on persecution of past generations. Get out and live YOUR life already.
I want to know which church is it exactly where the Reverend Jesse Jackson practices, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution? Can i get an AMEN on that one?
Or how about a "why do I care?"
I think the cops have every right to shoot you sorry ass if you're running from them.
Maybe so.
I also think they have the right to pull your ass over in you're breaking the law, regardless of what color you are.
True, but this whole "article" seems to have an ignorant racist slant to it that shouldn't go unnoticed even if individual statements ring true.
I think if you are too stupid to know how a ballot works, i don't want you deciding who should be running the most powerful nation in the world for the next four years.
Interesting. This is obviously a post from the Republican point of view, yet the result of this issue would be the election of a Democratic president, Al Gore.
I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me crap or trying to guilt me into making "donations" to their cause. These people should be targets.
These people are annoying yes, but targets?
I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes two parents.
Yes obviously mainstream America is doing a fine job raising their children (I worked in a National Guard boot camp for troubled teens so I know a thing or two about the state of youth in this country)
I believe if she has her lips on your Willie, it's sex, and this applies even if you are the President of the United States.
I also believe that what a man does is between him and his wife, even if he is the president.
And what the hell is going on with the gas prices... again?
We pay far less than anyone else in the world for gas, and make much more, yet make a big stink if the price of gas shoots up 20%. Face it, we have created a behemoth of a highway system that we can barely afford while public transportation alternatives have been largely ignored. Go America!
We need our country back!
You're right, but not back into the sorry state outline by this document.
DaveW
06-27-2002, 01:12 AM
Nice one RM...........oh and Certified Drunk.....you musta been to type all that.:rolleyes:
bad american no just an ugly one :(
BMXman
06-27-2002, 01:21 AM
Originally posted by Certified Drunk
YES I'M A BAD AMERICAN
I think owning a gun doesn't make you a killer, it makes you a smart American.
I think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized , and does not entitle you to anything.
I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, try to do it in ENGLISH.
My heroes are John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and whoever cancels Jerry Springer.
I've never owned a slave, or was a slave, i didn't wander forty years in the desert after getting chased out of Egypt. I haven't burned any witches or been persecuted by the Turks and neither have you! So, shut-the-hell-up already.
I want to know which church is it exactly where the Reverend Jesse Jackson practices, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution? Can i get an AMEN on that one?
I think the cops have every right to shoot you sorry ass if you're running from them.
I also think they have the right to pull your ass over in you're breaking the law, regardless of what color you are.
I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me crap or trying to guilt me into making "donations" to their cause. These people should be targets.
If this makes me a BAD American, then yes, I'm a BAD American.
We need our country back!
GOD BLESS THE U.S.A.
Maybe it's just me...but the comments that I have kept from his post ...seem a bit racist and angry to me......I think someone needs to look at the big picture....D
RideMonkey
06-27-2002, 01:29 AM
The worst thing about that is the quip about college.
Discounting the value of education is the ultimate ignorance.
I have a degree. I don't feel that it makes me any better than people that do not have degrees. My father does not have a college degree. If I can ever be the person that he is I will have achieved something great.
Yet I still yearn for knowledge. I often find myself wanting to leave the business world and return to acedemia only so that I can learn more. Not to improve my status in society or my paycheck, just to improve my knowledge and understanding of the world.
If everyone in this country committed themselves to a path of open-mindedness and learning, rather than the selfish, separatist statement made in this thread, we would trully be a great society.
gravity
06-27-2002, 07:09 AM
Originally posted by Certified Drunk
YES I'M A BAD AMERICAN
I am your worst Nightmare. I am a BAD American. I am Bill Lukshides.
I believe the money i make belongs to me and my family, and not some mid level governmental functionary be it Democratic or Republican!
your taxes paid for that road outside your house
I'm in touch with my feelings and i like it that way, damn it!
.......and.....?
I think owning a gun doesn't make you a killer, it makes you a smart American.
when everyone's got one...... ever heard of the Cold War? you know what it could have become? what's so smart about that?
I think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized , and does not entitle you to anything.
Unfortunately, there is a certain amount of truth in this...... over here, Aborigines receive a regular payout just because they are Aboriginal, regardless of employment status, income etc.
I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, try to do it in ENGLISH.
would you rike flies with that? :rolleyes:
I think fireworks should be legal on the 4th of July.
why only on the 4th of July? just cos it's my birthday? i think fireworks should be legal to people over the age of 18/21/whatever you call "adult"
I think that being a student doesn't give you any more enlightenment than working at Blockbuster. In fact, if your parents are footing the bill to put your pansy ass through 4 years plus, of college, you haven't begun to be enlightened.
what in the depths of Hell are you talking about?
I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God when and where they want to.
well we almost ran into a van full of Muslims about a year ago, when they stopped on the freeway at dusk to pray. they didn't pull over or anything, so there has to be some sort of reason here.
My heroes are John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and whoever cancels Jerry Springer.
thou shalt not idolise...... other guys....yeh...
I don't hate the rich. I don't pity the poor.
me neither
I know wrestling is fake and i don't waste my time arguing about it.
no SH!T
I think global warming is a big lie. Where are all those experts now, when i'm freezing my ass off during these long winters and speings and paying, paying, paying?
LMAO!!
I've never owned a slave, or was a slave, i didn't wander forty years in the desert after getting chased out of Egypt. I haven't burned any witches or been persecuted by the Turks and neither have you! So, shut-the-hell-up already.
i haven't met many people who need to learn to shut the hell up as much as you
I want to know which church is it exactly where the Reverend Jesse Jackson practices, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution? Can i get an AMEN on that one?
i don't think anybody really cares....
I think the cops have every right to shoot you sorry ass if you're running from them.
yeah, why not. good idea. every time you get pulled over by the cops, and you take more than .2 of a second to do it, they can say "you were trying to run from us"
I also think they have the right to pull your ass over in you're breaking the law, regardless of what color you are.
....and....?
I think if you are too stupid to know how a ballot works, i don't want you deciding who should be running the most powerful nation in the world for the next four years.
so true...... i still don't really care though.
I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me crap or trying to guilt me into making "donations" to their cause. These people should be targets.
i know. if we wanted to buy a novelty pen that didn't actually work, we'd go to school stationery suppliers :D
I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes two parents.
yeah, so?
I believe if she has her lips on your Willie, it's sex, and this applies even if you are the President of the United States.
this is relevant to what, how and why?
And what the hell is going on with the gas prices... again?
yanks have the cheapest gas prices in the WORLD, yet you still complain. this will sound racist, but only americans could complain that much.
If this makes me a BAD American, then yes, I'm a BAD American.
We need our country back!
you've still got it, never lost it, just majorly screwed it with the overidealistic morons who are superpowerful but actually don't have a fuggin clue what they're talking about
GOD BLESS THE U.S.A.
so the rest of the world is unimportant then. thanks.
Granola
06-27-2002, 07:23 AM
Originally posted by RideMonkey
If everyone in this country committed themselves to a path of open-mindedness and learning, rather than the selfish, separatist statement made in this thread, we would trully be a great society.
What more can I add to that....thank you rm.
I Are Baboon
06-27-2002, 07:32 AM
FYI: This is from George Carlin.
I agree with some of this, I disagree with some of this. Take it for what it's worth...George Carlin venting.
splat
06-27-2002, 07:57 AM
Originally posted by I Are Baboon
FYI: This is from George Carlin.
I agree with some of this, I disagree with some of this. Take it for what it's worth...George Carlin venting.
IAB is correct this is from George Carlin.
At the end of one of his 90 Minute HBO shows , this is how he ended it with that as a re-cap of his whole show, where if you had herd the bit aboutthe college students , taxes , Guns , etc. it makes a lot more sense if hear the whole thing.
zibbler
06-27-2002, 08:00 AM
Ummmm, don't know if you guys know this or not, but this is not original. I've seen this one floating around the net for a couple of years. Some say Ted Nugent wrote it, others say Rush limbaugh, and supposedly several other people have been credited with authoring it. I don't know who the hell wrote it, but it wasn't the guy who started this thread.
I Are Baboon
06-27-2002, 08:08 AM
Originally posted by zibbler
Some say Ted Nugent wrote it,
The Ted Nugent version. Again, I agree with some points, disagree with other points. Then again, I am an American and that is my right. :D
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001
Written by Ted Nugent, the rock singer and hunter/naturalists, upon hearing that California Senators B. Boxer and D. Feinstein denounced him for being a "gun owner" and a "Rock Star". This was his response after telling the senators about his past contributions to children's charities and scholarship foundations which have totaled more than $13.7 million in the last 5 years!!
I'm a Bad American-this pretty much sums it up for me.
I like big trucks, big boats, big houses, and naturally, pretty women.
I believe the money I make belongs to me and my family, not some midlevel governmental functionary with a bad comb-over who wants to give it away to crack addicts squirting out babies.
I don't care about appearing compassionate.
I think playing with toy guns doesn't make you a killer.
I believe ignoring your kids and giving them Prozac might.
I think I'm doing better than the homeless.
I don't think being a minority makes you noble or victimized.
I have the right not to be tolerant of others because they are
different, weird or make me mad.
This is my life to live, and not necessarily up to other expectations.
I know what SEX is and there are not varying degrees of it.
I don't celebrate Kwanzaa. But if you want to that's fine; I just don't feel like everyone else should have to.
I believe that if you are selling me a Dairy Queen shake, a pack of
cigarettes, or hotel room you do it in English. As of matter of fact,
if you are an American citizen you should speak English.
My uncles and forefathers shouldn't have had to die in vain so you can leave the countries you were born in to come disrespect ours, and make us bend to your will. Get over it.
I think the cops have every right to shoot your sorry butt if you're
running from them after they tell you to stop.
If you can't understand the word 'freeze' or 'stop' in English, see the previous line.
I don't use the excuse "it's for the children" as a shield for unpopular opinions or actions.
I know how to count votes and I feel much safer letting a machine with no political affiliation do a recount when needed.
I know what the definition of lying is, and it isn't based on the word "is"-ever.
I don't think just because you were not born in this country, you
qualify for any special loan programs, gov't sponsored bank loans, etc., so you can open a hotel, 7-Eleven, trinket shop, or any thing else, while the indigenous peoples can't get past a high school education because they can't afford it.
I didn't take the initiative in inventing the Internet.
I thought the Taco Bell dog was funny.
I want them to bring back safe and sane fireworks.
I believe no one ever died because of something Ozzy Osbourne, Ice-Tor Marilyn Manson sang, but that doesn't mean I want to listen to that crap from someone else's car when I'm stopped at a red light. But I respect your right to.
I think that being a student doesn't give you any more enlightenment that working at Blockbuster or Jack In The Box.
I don't want to eat or drink anything with the words light, lite or
fat-free on the package.
Our soldiers did not go to some foreign country and risk their livesin vain and defend our Constitution so that decades later you can tell me it's a living document ever changing and is open to interpretation. The guys who wrote it were light years ahead of anyone today, and they mean what they said -- now leave the document alone, or there's going to be trouble.
I don't hate the rich.
I help the poor.
I know wrestling is fake.
I've never owned, or was a slave, and a large percentage of our
forefathers weren't wealthy enough to own one either.
Please stop blaming me because some prior white people were idiots -and remember, tons of white, Indian Chinese, and other races have been enslaved too - it was wrong for every one of them.
I believe a self-righteous liberal Democrat with a cause is more
dangerous than a Hell's Angel with an attitude.
I want to know exactly which church is it where the "Reverend" Jessie Jackson preaches; and, what exactly is his job function.
I own a gun, you can own a gun, and any red blooded American should be allowed to own a gun, but if you use it in a crime, then you will serve the time.
I think Bill Gates has every right to keep every penny he made and continue to make more. If it makes you mad, then invent the next operating system that's better and put your name on the building.
Ask your buddy that invented the Internet to help you.
I don't believe in hate crime legislation. Even suggesting it makes me mad.
You're telling me that someone who is a minority, gay, disabled, another nationality, or otherwise different from the mainstream of this country has more value as a human being that I do as a white male.
If someone kills anyone, I'd say that it's a hate crime.
We don't need more laws! Let's enforce the ones we already have.
I think turkey bacon, turkey beef, turkey fake anything sucks.
I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child-it takes a
parent with the guts to stand up to the kid and spank his butt and say "NO!" when it's necessary to do so.
I'll admit that the only movie that ever made me cry was Ole Yeller.
I didn't realize Dr. Seuss was a genius until I had a kid.
I will not be frowned upon or be looked down upon or be made to keep silent because I have these beliefs and opinions. I thought this country allowed me that right.
I will not conform or compromise just to keep from hurting somebody's feelings.
I'm neither angry nor disenfranchised, no matter how desperately the mainstream media would like the world to believe otherwise.
Yes, I guess by some people's definition, I may be a bad American.
But that's tough. Ted Nugent
mr_dove
06-27-2002, 09:15 AM
I would say that I agree with almost everything listed on both the original certified drunk version and the Ted Nuggent version.
I also think that there are way too many people on this board to seem to have something up their A$$. Some people here seem to get offended at ANYTHING relating to fags (not gay, fags) , minorities or anything else.
I think I have the right to dislike or disagree with anyone that I want to.
I don't want to offend anyone, but I think that ridemonkey was really rude. His first response had an insult in almost every line. I think that's pretty sad.
I AM a bad american.
RideMonkey
06-27-2002, 11:05 AM
Originally posted by mr_dove
I don't want to offend anyone, but I think that ridemonkey was really rude. His first response had an insult in almost every line. I think that's pretty sad.
Almost every statement in the original post was rude, offensive, and racist.
I'm embarrassed that this is the sentiment among a large portion of the US population. People from other countries read this forum and I don't want to be represented in this way.
RideMonkey
06-27-2002, 11:07 AM
Originally posted by zibbler
Ummmm, don't know if you guys know this or not, but this is not original. I've seen this one floating around the net for a couple of years. Some say Ted Nugent wrote it, others say Rush limbaugh, and supposedly several other people have been credited with authoring it. I don't know who the hell wrote it, but it wasn't the guy who started this thread.
Of course he is not the original author, and it seems that it is an altered version of the original text. But the message is still clear.
Toshi
06-27-2002, 11:17 AM
I'm with ya, RM. The racist bent was clear. But maybe my opinion doesn't count, since I'm just a "pansy college boy" according to these guys... :rolleyes:
Originally posted by RideMonkey
Almost every statement in the original post was rude, offensive, and racist.
I'm embarrassed that this is the sentiment among a large portion of the US population. People from other countries read this forum and I don't want to be represented in this way.
ummbikes
06-27-2002, 11:20 AM
Originally posted by Toshi
I'm with ya, RM. The racist bent was clear. But maybe my opinion doesn't count, since I'm just a "pansy college boy" according to these guys... :rolleyes:
Toshi, your worse than that, your a HARVARD "pansy college boy" shesh, how bad can it get.
I guess you could go to a tree hugger school like Evergreen...:rolleyes:
RideMonkey
06-27-2002, 11:39 AM
Sheesh this thread brings back memories of every family gathering I've had in the last 10 years. My conservative religious grandparents would praise the words in that post.
People with this mindset like to discount anything that might go against the way they believe or the way they live. If "global warming" is gonna mean slightly higher prices at the gas pump then they are going to find a couple of pieces of info refuting global warming and they are going to latch onto that information to their death beds so that they can be right about it. Even though average tempatures have climbed all over the world, the guy in the midwest who experiences a particularly harsh winter (a local and normal part of the cycle) is going to claim that global warming is bunk cuz of how cold it is in his town! Nonsense! If you want to really know the truth about something read about it! These people don't care, they just want to be right. (whether or not global warming is a real phenomenom is not the issue here, the issue is where these people get there information.)
Last Xmas one of my relatives started in with his conservative rhetoric and brought up the subject of the Microsoft anti-trust lawsuit. "Can you believe how government is interfering with business this way blah blah....". Now of course he does not know even one fact about the case nor does he know anything about the historical precedence of anti-trust laws. I start to explain to him about Microsofts anti-competative practices and I give him a clear example of how if his business were an upstart software company that Microsoft has the power, and maybe the inclination, to ruin his business before it ever got a fair shot in the market. He reluctantly listened and agreed that the points were valid, but 5 minutes later returned to his foundless generalizations "can you believe what they are doing to Mocrosoft...." They just don't want to hear it.
I can't go along with close minded people, or close minded statments.
The differences were subtle, but Nugent's version was much MUCH better. I might not agree with him on everything, but what he wrote was thoughtful and I respect him for it. I can't say the same for certified drunks's version.
And Mr. Dove, for a devout Christian, you seem to have a lot of anger and hate bottled up. Every time you use the word "fag," you might as well refer to Jews as "crematoriums," African Americans as "nooses," and Japanese as "A-bombs." Jesus might forgive you, but I don't.
Toshi
06-27-2002, 12:30 PM
Originally posted by ummbikes
Toshi, your worse than that, your a HARVARD "pansy college boy" shesh, how bad can it get.
I guess you could go to a tree hugger school like Evergreen...:rolleyes:
Yeah, seriously. Harvard defines "liberal bastion" apparently to Heston. :rolleyes: How did I ever turn out Libertarian in this place? :eek: :D
Zonic Man
06-27-2002, 12:33 PM
This post rules.
I like Carlin and Nugent (although Nugent didn't actually write it.) They're spot on.
LeatherFace
06-27-2002, 12:41 PM
Originally posted by mr_dove
I also think that there are way too many people on this board to seem to have something up their A$$. Some people here seem to get offended at ANYTHING relating to fags (not gay, fags) , minorities or anything else.
So, please tell me, what other kinds of "fags" are there but gays?
zibbler
06-27-2002, 12:43 PM
Originally posted by LeatherFace
So, please tell me, what other kinds of "fags" are there but gays?
Well, in England fags are cigarettes :D No, really, that's what they call them there lol.
Zonic Man
06-27-2002, 12:44 PM
Originally posted by LeatherFace
So, please tell me, what other kinds of "fags" are there but gays?
Camel, Marlbro, Benson and Hedges, Newports, Winston, etc.
LOL. Just trying to humor it up.
Damn True
06-27-2002, 12:45 PM
I believe if she has her lips on your Willie, it's sex, and this applies even if you are the President of the United States.
This is true. The rest is tripe.
Originally posted by zibbler
Well, in England fags are cigarettes :D No, really, that's what they call them there lol.
Right, because the literal meaning of the word "fagot" is a bundle of small twigs for burning. It came to be slang for homosexuals because fagots were used to burn accused homosexuals at the stake. Real pleasant. Very christian. I'm sure Jesus approves.
LeatherFace
06-27-2002, 12:53 PM
Originally posted by ohio
Right, because the literal meaning of the word is small twig for burning. It came to be slang for homosexuals because bundles of fags were used to burn accused homosexuals at the stake. Real pleasant. Very christian. I'm sure Jesus approves.
Interesting...I didn't know that. Did you know that the "pink triangle" that is used as a symbol for gays/gay areas/gay friendly was originally used by Nazis to denote homosexuals, like the yellow star of David was used to identify Jews?
Damn True
06-27-2002, 12:54 PM
Originally posted by ohio
Right, because the literal meaning of the word is small twig for burning. It came to be slang for homosexuals because bundles of fags were used to burn accused homosexuals at the stake. Real pleasant. Very christian. I'm sure Jesus approves.
I always wondered about the origin of that ugly word.
You are correct sir. Jesus would not approve.
"Neither do I condemn you."
kitchenware
06-27-2002, 12:57 PM
It's interesting to see who gets fired up over what, on these types of posts.
Are you calling me a racist, a bigot or a cigarette smoker? lol, good stuff.
Sheesh, kick back, smoke a bowl and eat your burger from the local fast food place that is dressed wrong because of the guy at the counter couldn't speak a FOKKING WORD of English.
jim -way more relaxed than most.
This post is entirely too controversial and should be deleted, promptly. lol
kitchenware
06-27-2002, 01:00 PM
Originally posted by ohio
Right, because the literal meaning of the word is small twig for burning. It came to be slang for homosexuals because bundles of fags were used to burn accused homosexuals at the stake. Real pleasant. Very christian. I'm sure Jesus approves.
Uh oh, let's all hit the urban legend site for this one.
llkoolkeg
06-27-2002, 01:05 PM
Originally posted by RideMonkey
People with this mindset like to discount anything that might go against the way they believe or the way they live. If "global warming" is gonna mean slightly higher prices at the gas pump then they are going to find a couple of pieces of info refuting global warming and they are going to latch onto that information to their death beds so that they can be right about it. Even though average tempatures have climbed all over the world, the guy in the midwest who experiences a particularly harsh winter (a local and normal part of the cycle) is going to claim that global warming is bunk cuz of how cold it is in his town! Nonsense! If you want to really know the truth about something read about it! These people don't care, they just want to be right. (whether or not global warming is a real phenomenom is not the issue here, the issue is where these people get there information.)
stated principle. To be open-minded, you have to objectively consider possibilities even if they conflict with your pre-conceived notions.
It has been suggested by many well-respected scientists and statisticians that the whole theory of global warming is based on a cyclical anomoly, drawn without sufficient historical sampling, for the purpose of creating support for the "environmentalist" movement and ironically, the corporate interests behind the scenes. The "theory" suggests that average global temperatures are rising based on relatively recent(in planetary terms) statistical trends, due to the greenhouse effect which CFCs cause by altering the atmospheric ozone layer.
Instead of discounting those who question the theory, why not research it? As theories go, it is frankly not well documented and its conclusions are certainly open to debate. Many stand to profit from its acceptance, though. Dupont now has a fresh patent on refrigerant. (The patent for the now-unenvironmentally-friendly Freon had run out and other companies could have sold it, cutting into Dupont's profits. Now that a new refrigerant has been environmentally mandated, Dupont now has decades more of monopoly on the new product. Wanna bet whether or not a more environmentally-friendly version becomes necessary when the new patent runs out?) Environmental lobbies and the politicians they support also stand to gain much, as it's an easy sell to the uninformed. Who wants to risk coming across as being against the environment even if the theory is bunk?
I could go on, but I'll spare you all. I'm not saying that global warming does or does not exist or that it is or is not a bad thing. Who knows? I sure dont. All we have is wild-ass-guesses to go on. I would just caution you against aligning yourself one way or the other along a political Maginot Line without any conclusive evidence. It's bad enough that goverment policy is influenced by pseudo-scientific pronouncements.
RideMonkey
06-27-2002, 01:13 PM
Originally posted by llkoolkeg
I could go on, but I'll spare you all. I'm not saying that global warming does or does not exist or that it is or is not a bad thing. Who knows? I sure dont. All we have is wild-ass-guesses to go on. I would just caution you against aligning yourself one way or the other along a political Maginot Line without any conclusive evidence. It's bad enough that goverment policy is influenced by pseudo-scientific pronouncements.
I have studied it.
I have a degree in geology. A large part of the curiculum is the study of climactic changes over the history of the Earth.
Even though I know more than most about this subject, I am not going to make statements about wether or not Global Warming is a real phenomenon or not. Even with my knowledge I find it warrants much more research before any reasonable conclusions can be made.
So if I don't know, how the hell do these people know that global warming is BS? From the 2 or 3 bits of info they have pulled outta the news or from word of mouth from fellow skeptics?
kitchenware
06-27-2002, 01:15 PM
Oh and while we're at it.
That wasn't written by George or Ted or anyone else famous. That 'essay' appeared on freerepublic.com back in 2000.
The homosexuals burning at the stake and the origin of the word 'fag' is just about as outlandish going here to look up anyone's drivers license. http://cgi.slygreetings.com/page.pl?page=53
jim -the internet is a dangerous tool for some.
Originally posted by kitchenware
Oh and while we're at it.
That wasn't written by George or Ted or anyone else famous. That 'essay' appeared on freerepublic.com back in 2000.
The homosexuals burning at the stake and the origin of the word 'fag' is just about as outlandish going here to look up anyone's drivers license. http://cgi.slygreetings.com/page.pl?page=53
jim -the internet is a dangerous tool for some.
Actually the internet just helped me to double check what I was taught in 4th grade. Turns out I was close, but it's not as bad as I thought.
"The most common explanation for the homosexual epithet goes like this: Faggot is a bundle of sticks, from the Italian. In the late 16th century, the word acquired the sense of a woman, especially a shrewish one. The sense probably comes from the idea of a faggot being a burden or baggage (not unlike the modern ball and chain). Jump to the US, circa 1917, and the word transferred to effeminate or homosexual men."
So I stand (self) corrected.
The word is still incredibly offensive, however, thanks to the connotations our society has attached to it.
llkoolkeg
06-27-2002, 01:53 PM
Originally posted by RideMonkey
So if I don't know, how the hell do these people know that global warming is BS? From the 2 or 3 bits of info they have pulled outta the news or from word of mouth from fellow skeptics?
The study of philosophy, primarily Western, taught me that(in a nutshell) the reigns of the world are held not by the the moderate 10% of people with the brains and character to lead well, but by the 10% of the population at either extreme who have the passion and determination(but none of the sense) to herd the apathetic masses-in-the-middle to whatever rhetorical cause is currently in style.
Damn True
06-27-2002, 02:05 PM
I have a theroy, and it is just that, and by my own admission totally unproven. Here goes.
100 or so years ago we didn't track stuff like mean equatorial tempratures, snowfall water content etc. with the degree of accuracy that we do today, if at all. So is it possible that what we are in now is part of a cycle? Not actually the result of something we have done, but something that is occuring despite what we have done.
Did the ozone hole exist before we had the technology or the desire to detect it?
We keep hearing that these "ozone gasses" are the reason for the problem. Yet a single volcanic eruption (Mt. Pinutaubo in the PI) spewed a greater volume of these types of gasses than mankind has ever produced. It certainly isn't the first volcano to errupt is it?
Now I am not saying we all ought to go out and empty a can of aqua-net and dump used motor oil in a creek. But maybe the earth is less fragile than we give it credit for and we are less significant than we would like to think.
Toshi
06-27-2002, 02:36 PM
While your point of our insignificance is well taken, you should do some research before you question some relatively established phenomena such as ozone depletion and global warming. For instance, from http://www.atm.ch.cam.ac.uk/tour/part1.html comes a clear chart showing ozone depletion over time:
http://www.atm.ch.cam.ac.uk/tour/tour_images/total_ozone.s.gif
I have no clue about global warming, and Google-ing turns up some funky (and suspect) results, but this page, being from the NASA Goddard Institute, looks reputatble: http://www.giss.nasa.gov/edu/gwdebate/ . From it:
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/edu/gwdebate/00fig1.GIF
Damn True
06-27-2002, 02:44 PM
Point taken, but those charts only go back to 1960. 40 years is a comparative tick of the stopwatch if we are talking global weather trends. What was the trend over the previous 100 years or so?
What I would like to see is something accurate that captures both pre and post industrial results.
Can that sort of info be reliably gleaned from growth patterns in sequoia or bristlecone pine (oldest living things on the planet)?
llkoolkeg
06-27-2002, 03:01 PM
that ozone depletion and global warming were facts(highly debatable), you cannot prove 1) that these effects are negative 2) that these effects were caused by anything humans did, or 3) that the effects are reversible by anything within human capacity. Who's to say that this is not all part of the Earth's regular cooling and warming cycles that occur at 20,000 year intervals? With only a few thousand years of recorded human history and only a few decades of temperature data, don't you think that trying to diagnose the planet is perhaps a little beyond our meager reach? This all reminds me of the incredible effort undertaken by "concerned citizens" to put out lightning fires in badland regions...until it was discovered that these fires were nature's method of renewal and rebirth. Carlin did a funny skit on this topic, as well.
Originally posted by llkoolkeg
Who's to say that this is not all part of the Earth's regular cooling and warming cycles that occur at 20,000 year intervals?
Ice core samples from the Arctic and Antarctic give us a pretty nice picture of those 20,000 year cycles.
Owning a gun makes you a smarter american?????? where do you come up with this sh*t? Were not fighting for our indepenence from england anymore........you dont need to own a deadly weapon.
Zonic Man
06-27-2002, 06:41 PM
Originally posted by llkoolkeg
The study of philosophy, primarily Western, taught me that(in a nutshell) the reigns of the world are held not by the the moderate 10% of people with the brains and character to lead well, but by the 10% of the population at either extreme who have the passion and determination(but none of the sense) to herd the apathetic masses-in-the-middle to whatever rhetorical cause is currently in style.
My study of philosophy has taught me that the more I learn, the less I know.
Regarding what you wrote there...how very Hegel of you. Obviously NOT a Machiavellian.
fourgivn1
06-27-2002, 10:00 PM
Originally posted by RideMonkey
Sheesh this thread brings back memories of every family gathering I've had in the last 10 years. My conservative religious grandparents would praise the words in that post.
Just for the record, I would be considered conservative religious as well...however, while I don't agree with anyone insulting anyone at ALL (because it's not cool - although I understand why you felt as you did, for sure), I would definitely agree that the whole 'bad American' thing has a racist bent to it. Not all of us conservative religious nuts are 100% closed minded about EVERYTHING. :D
gecko
06-27-2002, 10:02 PM
Originally posted by Toshi
Yeah, seriously. Harvard defines "liberal bastion" apparently to Heston. :rolleyes: How did I ever turn out Libertarian in this place? :eek: :D
Toshi, you might appreciate this, I think it's pretty damn funny. Conan O'Brien's speach to the class of 2000 at Harvard:
I’d like to begin by thanking the class marshals for inviting me here today. The last time I was invited to Harvard it cost me $110,000. So I was reluctant to show up. I’m going to start before I really begin by announcing my one goal this afternoon. I want to be half as funny as tomorrow’s Commencement speaker, moral philosopher and economist Amartya Sen. That’s the job. Must get more laughs than seminal wage-price theoretician. By the way, enjoy that. Bring a calculator. It’s going to be a nerd fest.
Students of the Harvard class of 2000, 15 years ago I sat where you sit now. And I thought exactly what you are now thinking. What’s going to happen to me? Will I find my place in the world? Am I really graduating a virgin? Still have 24 hours. Roommate’s mom very hot. Swear she’s checking me out. There was that Rob Lowe movie.
Being here today, on a sincere note, is very special for me. I do miss this place. I especially miss Harvard Square. Let me tell you, (you don’t know this) Harvard Square is unique. Nowhere else in the world will you find a man wearing a turban and a Red Sox jacket working in a lesbian bookstore. I’m just glad my dad’s working.
It’s particularly sweet for me to be here today because—this is true—when I graduated I wanted very badly to be a Class Day speaker. Unfortunately, my speech was rejected. So if you’ll indulge me I’d like to read a portion of that speech. This is the actual speech from 15 years ago. “Fellow students, as we sit here today listening to that classic A-ha tune which will definitely stand the test of time, I would like to make several predictions about what the future will hold. I believe that one day a simple governor from a small southern state will rise to the highest office in the land. He will lack political skill, but will lead on the sheer strength of his moral authority. I believe that justice will prevail and one day the Berlin Wall will crumble, uniting East and West Berlin forever under Communist rule. I believe that one day a high-speed network of interconnected computers will spring up worldwide, so enriching people that they will lose their interest in idle chitchat and pornography. And finally, I believe that one day I will have a television show on a major network seen by millions of people at night which I will use to reenact crimes and and help catch at-large criminals.” Then I had a section on the death of Wall Street, but you don’t need to hear about that.
The point is that although you see me as a celebrity, a member of the cultural elite, a demigod if you will, and potential husband material, I came here in the fall of 1981 and lived at Holworthy Hall as a student much like you. I was, without exaggeration—this is true—the ugliest picture in the freshman facebook. When Harvard asked me for a picture the previous summer, I thought it was for their records, so I jogged in the August heat to a passport photo office and sat for a morgue shot. To make matters worse, when the facebook came out, they put my picture right next to Catherine Oxenberg, a stunning blonde actress who was expected to join the class of ‘85, but decided to defer admission so she could join the cast of Dynasty. Folks, my photo would have looked bad on any page, but next to Catherine Oxenberg, I looked like a mackerel that had been in a car accident.
You see, in those days, I was 6 feet 4 inches tall and I weighed 150 pounds. True. Recently, I had some structural engineers run those numbers into a computer model, and according to the computer, I collapsed in 1987, killing hundreds in Taiwan.
After freshman year, I moved to Mather House. Mather House, incidentally, was designed by the same firm that built Hitler’s bunker. In fact, if Hitler had conducted the war from Mather House, he would have shot himself a year earlier. Saved us a lot of trouble.
1985 seems like a long time ago now. When I had my Class Day, you students would have been seven years old. Seven years old! You realize what that means? Back then I could have beaten any of you in a fight. And I mean really badly. Like no contest at all. If anyone here has a time machine, seriously, I will kick your seven-year-old butt right now.
A lot has happened in 15 years though. When you think about it, we come from completely different worlds. When I graduated in 1985, we watched movies starring Tom Cruise and listened to music by Madonna. I come from a time when we huddled around the TV set and watched the Cosby Show on NBC, never imagining that there would one day be a show called Cosby on CBS. In 1985 we drove cars with driver’s-side air bags. But if you had told us that one day there would be passenger-side air bags, we’d have burned you for witchcraft.
Of course I think there is some common ground between us. I remember well the great uncertainty of this day, the anxiety. Many of you are justifiably nervous about leaving the safe, comfortable world of Harvard Yard and hurling yourself headlong into the cold, harsh world of Harvard grad school, a plum job in your father’s firm, or a year abroad with a gold Amex card and then a plum job at your father’s firm. Let me assure you that the knowledge you gained here at Harvard is a precious gift that will never leave you. Take it from me, your education is yours to keep forever. Why, many of you have read the Merchant of Florence, and that will inspire you when you travel to the island of Spain. Your knowledge of that problem they had with those people in Russia, or that guy in South America—you know, the guy—will be with you for the rest of your life.
There’s also sadness today. A feeling of loss that you’re leaving Harvard forever. Let me assure you that you never really leave Harvard. The Harvard fundraising committee will be on your ass until the day you die.
This is true. I know for a fact that right now a member of the alumni association is at the Mount Auburn Cemetery shaking down the corpse of Henry Adams. They heard he has a brass toe ring and they aim to get it. These people just raised $2.5 billion and they only got through the Bs in the alumni directory. Here’s basically how it works. Your phone rings, usually after a big meal when you’re tired and most vulnerable, and a voice asks you for money. Knowing—you’ve read in the paper—that they just raised $2.5 billion, you ask, “What do you need it for?” There is a long pause, and the voice on the other end of the line says, “We don’t need it, we just want it.” (Sinister laugh).
Let me see—by your applause—who here wrote a thesis? That’s nice. A lot of hard work went into that thesis. And no one is ever going to care. I wrote a thesis—this is true, I don’t lie—“Literary Progeria in the Works of Flannery O’Connor and William Faulkner.” Let’s just say that during my discussions with Pauly Shore, it doesn’t come up much. For three years after graduation I wanted to show it to everyone, and so I kept my thesis in the glove compartment of my car, so that I could show it to a policeman in case I was pulled over.
What else can you expect in the real world? Let me tell you. As you leave these gates and re-enter society, one thing is certain. Everyone out there is going to hate you. Never tell anyone in a roadside diner that you went to Harvard. In those situations, the correct response to, “Where did you go to school?” is “School? I never had much in the way of book learnin’ and such.” And then get in your BMW and get the hell out of there. Go.
You see, kids, you’re in for a lifetime of “And you went to Harvard?” Accidentally give the wrong amount of change in a transaction, and it’s “And you went to Harvard?” Ask at the hardware store how the jumper cables work, and hear “And you went to Harvard?” Forget just once that your underwear goes inside your pants, and it’s “And you went to Harvard?” Get your head stuck in your niece’s doll house ‘cause you want to see what it’s like to be a giant, and it’s “Uncle Conan, you went to Harvard?”
So you really know what’s in store for you after Harvard, I have to tell you what happened to me after graduation. I’m going to tell it simply, I’m going to tell it honestly, because, first of all, I think my perspective may give many of you hope, and, secondly, it’s such a cool, amazing rush to be in front of 6,000 people and just talk about yourself. It’s just great. It’s so cool. And I can take my time.
cont...
gecko
06-27-2002, 10:02 PM
cont...
You see, kids, after graduating in May, I moved to Los Angeles. I got a three-week contract at a small cable show. I got a $380-a-month apartment, a terrible dump, and I bought a 1977 Isuzu Opal, a car Isuzu only manufactured for a year because they found out that technically it’s not a car. Quick tip, graduates—no four-cylinder used vehicle should have a racing stripe.
So I worked on that show for about a year, feeling pretty good about myself, when one day they told me that they were letting me go. I was fired. I hadn’t saved any money. So I tried to get another job in television as best I could and couldn’t find one. So with nowhere else to turn-true story—I went to a temp agency and filled out a questionnaire. I made damn sure that they knew I had been to Harvard, that I had written this thesis, and that I expected the very best treatment. And so the next day I was sent to the Santa Monica branch of Wilson’s House of Suede and Leather.
When you have a Harvard degree, and you are working at Wilson’s House of Suede and Leather, you are haunted by the ghostly images of your classmates who chose graduate school. You see their faces everywhere—in coffee cups, in fish tanks, you think you’re going crazy, and they’re always laughing at you as you stack suede shirts no man in good conscience would ever wear.
I tried a lot of things during this period. Acting in corporate infomercials. Serving drinks in a nonequity theater. I even took a job entertaining at a seven year-old’s birthday party. In desperate need of work, I put together some sketches and scored a job at the fledgling Fox network as a writer and performer for a brainy show called the “Wilton North Report.” I was finally on a network and really excited. The producer told me the show was going to revolutionize television. And, in a way it did. The show was so hated and did so badly that when four weeks later news of its cancellation was announced to the Fox affiliates, they burst into spontaneous applause.
Eventually, though, I got a big break. I had submitted along with my writing partner a batch of sketches to Saturday Night Live, and after a year and a half they read it, and they gave us a two-week tryout. The two weeks turned into two seasons, and I felt, hey, this is success, I’m successful now. Successful enough to write a TV pilot for an original sitcom. When the network decided to make it, feeling good, I left Saturday Night Live.
This TV show was going to be groundbreaking. It was going to resurrect the career of TV’s Batman, Adam West. It was going to be a comedy without a laugh track or a studio audience. It was going to change all the rules. And here’s what happened. When the pilot aired, it was the second-lowest-rated television show of all time. It is actually tied with a test pattern they show up in Nova Scotia.
So I was 28 and, once again, no job. I had good writing credits in New York, but I was filled with disappointment and I had no idea what I was going to do next. And that is when the Simpsons saved my life. I got a job there and started writing episodes about Springfield getting a monorail or Homer going to college. I was finally putting my Harvard education to good use—writing dialogue for a man who is so stupid that in one episode he forgot to make his own heart beat. Life was good.
And then an insane, inexplicable opportunity came my way, a chance to audition for host of the new “Late Night” show. I took the opportunity very seriously, but at the time—I have to be honest—I had the relaxed confidence of someone who knew he had no real shot, so I couldn’t fear losing a great job that I could never hope to have. And I think that actually that attitude made the difference.
I will never forget being in the Simpsons recording basement that morning when the phone rang. It was for me. My car was blocking a firelane. But a week later I got another call and got the job. So this, finally, was undeniably it. The truly life-altering break that I had always dreamed of. And so I went to work. I gathered all my funny friends and poured all my years of comedy experience into building the show over the summer. I gathered the talent, figured out the sensibility, found Max, found Andy, found my people. We debuted on September 13, 1993, and I was really happy, really happy, with our effort. I felt like I had seized the moment, that I had put my very best foot forward.
And this was what the most respected and widely read television critic, Tom Shales, wrote in the Washington Post. “O’Brien is a living collage of annoying nervous habits. He giggles and jiggles about and fiddles with his cuffs. He has dark, beady little eyes like a rabbit. He is one of the whitest white men ever. O’Brien is a switch on the guest who won’t leave: he’s the host who should never have come. Let the Late Show with Conan O’Brien become the late Late Show, and may the host return to whence he came.” There’s more, but it gets kind of mean.
Needless to say, I took a lot of criticism, some of it deserved, some of it excessive, and, to be honest with you, it hurt like you would not believe. But I’m telling you all this for a reason. I’ve had a lot of success. I’ve had a lot of failure. I’ve looked good. I’ve looked bad. I’ve been praised. And I’ve been criticized. But my mistakes have been necessary. I’ve dwelled on my failures today because, as graduates of Harvard, your biggest liability is your need to succeed, your need to always find yourself on the sweet side of the bell curve. Success is a lot like a bright white tuxedo. You feel terrific when you get it, but then you’re desperately afraid of getting it dirty, of spoiling it.
I left the cocoon of Harvard, I left the cocoon of Saturday Night Live, I left the cocoon of the Simpsons. And each time it was bruising and tumultuous. And yet every failure was freeing, and today I’m as nostalgic for the bad as I am for the good. So that’s what I wish for all of you—the bad as well as the good. Fall down. Make a mess. Break something occasionally. Know that your mistakes are your own unique way of getting to where you need to be. And remember that the story is never over.
If you’ll indulge me for just a second, I’d like to read a little something from just this year. “Somehow, Conan O’Brien has transformed himself into the brightest star in the late-night firmament. His comedy is the gold standard, and Conan himself is not only the quickest and most inventive wit of his generation, but quite possibly the greatest host ever.”
Ladies and gentlemen, class of 2000, I wrote that this morning. As proof that when all else fails, you always have delusion. I will go now to make bigger mistakes and to embarrass this fine institution even more. But let me leave you with one last thought. If you can laugh at yourself, loud and hard, every time you fall, people will think you’re drunk. Thank you.
Danchez
06-27-2002, 10:40 PM
ted or whoever wrote it is 95% on the money. i don't think that certified drunk's post had very much slant. i think that rm's reply had much more slant and was steeped in much more bitterness that the former. rm twisted his statements and made certdrunk look like a fool. not very classy. especiabut since he's supposed to be mature here. but it's his place so we're guests. still lame if you ask me. nobody did. did they? sucks for you doesn't it?
Toshi
06-27-2002, 10:53 PM
Originally posted by gecko
If you’ll indulge me for just a second, I’d like to read a little something from just this year. “Somehow, Conan O’Brien has transformed himself into the brightest star in the late-night firmament. His comedy is the gold standard, and Conan himself is not only the quickest and most inventive wit of his generation, but quite possibly the greatest host ever.”
Ladies and gentlemen, class of 2000, I wrote that this morning. As proof that when all else fails, you always have delusion. I will go now to make bigger mistakes and to embarrass this fine institution even more. But let me leave you with one last thought. If you can laugh at yourself, loud and hard, every time you fall, people will think you’re drunk. Thank you.
Thanks for posting that, gecko. I'm actually getting a bit nervous about my future, even tho I have a year left. :eek: I think I'm going to take the "year abroad with a gold Amex card" then the "cold, harsh world of Harvard grad school" if I can swing it. :D
Zonic Man
06-28-2002, 12:15 AM
That Conan thing was a peach.
Tenaciousle0
06-28-2002, 12:46 AM
studies using satellites and non urban heating aras have shown that global temperature s are actually dropping, and geolgic records show that we are actually going in to an ice age.
As far as the Ozone hole is concerned: A new study from Japan shows that due to the various laws banning cfc's and other harmful chemicals the ozone will be whole again by 2060.
ibismojo
06-28-2002, 12:47 AM
Originally posted by LeatherFace
So, please tell me, what other kinds of "fags" are there but gays?
cigarettes? or are those called figs in England....
ibismojo
06-28-2002, 12:51 AM
Originally posted by Zonic Man
My study of philosophy has taught me that the more I learn, the less I know.
hmm...Heisenberg's Principle of Uncertainty?
Zonic Man
06-28-2002, 01:33 AM
Originally posted by ibismojo
hmm...Heisenberg's Principle of Uncertainty?
Nope, Jed's Principle of Idiocy.
ibismojo
06-28-2002, 02:29 AM
Originally posted by Zonic Man
Nope, Jed's Principle of Idiocy.
suprisingly similar the Heisenberg theory...i think you're onto something.
Shortbus
06-28-2002, 06:56 AM
yeeha!!!! guns and fireworks!!!!!!!!!
http://www.ruthlessreviews.com/pics/dougghostworld.jpg
llkoolkeg
06-28-2002, 11:00 AM
Originally posted by Zonic Man
My study of philosophy has taught me that the more I learn, the less I know. Regarding what you wrote there...how very Hegel of you. Obviously NOT a Machiavellian.
ignorance. If you haven't the capacity to comprehend human potential, you haven't the capacity to comprehend how far short of it you fall.
:D
JOhnG
06-28-2002, 04:27 PM
Originally posted by Certified Drunk
YES I'M A BAD AMERICAN
I am your worst Nightmare. I am a BAD American. I am Bill Lukshides.
I believe the money i make belongs to me and my family, and not some mid level governmental functionary be it Democratic or Republican!
and i'm a socialist and belive that about half of your money should go to the goverment. if your making millions by digging big holes in our planet and spilling oilm all over the alaskin coast you should give some of your money to help a kid in the ghetto pay for his cancer treatment.
I'm in touch with my feelings and i like it that way, damn it!
O.K.
I think owning a gun doesn't make you a killer, it makes you a smart American.
i think if guns were banished and wiped out nobady would need a gun to "protect" themselves
I think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized , and does not entitle you to anything.
no being a minority doesn't entital you to those things but you do diserve some help so you and your fellow racists in upper managment can't keep every hispanc person in this nation unemployed
I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, try to do it in ENGLISH.
i belive that is the most racest thing i have heard all day. tell meagain why you care if someone is trying to sell people other than you burgers?
I think fireworks should be legal on the 4th of July.
they are here
I think that being a student doesn't give you any more enlightenment than working at Blockbuster. In fact, if your parents are footing the bill to put your pansy ass through 4 years plus, of college, you haven't begun to be enlightened.
mabye if you went to collage you would change your mind, no?
I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God when and where they want to.
yes, but people sould not bne forced to pray to someone elses god
My heroes are John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and whoever cancels Jerry Springer.
but i love jerry
I don't hate the rich. I don't pity the poor.
i have nothing witty to say here, i agree
I know wrestling is fake and i don't waste my time arguing about it.
again i agree
I think global warming is a big lie. Where are all those experts now, when i'm freezing my ass off during these long winters and speings and paying, paying, paying?
hmmm.... would you like to ghive me some statistics or studies? oh no are you just another armchair scientist?
I've never owned a slave, or was a slave, i didn't wander forty years in the desert after getting chased out of Egypt. I haven't burned any witches or been persecuted by the Turks and neither have you! So, shut-the-hell-up already.
but your ancestors did wipe out the native amaricans and ruined familys for several generations. have you ever been to a reservation? if you went you might just see how badly we screwed up there lives
I want to know which church is it exactly where the Reverend Jesse Jackson practices, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution? Can i get an AMEN on that one?
wow, a blck demacratic revrand, hmmm... i wonder why you have a problem w/ that
I think the cops have every right to shoot you sorry ass if you're running from them.
can they shoot at me if i pull out my wallet?
I also think they have the right to pull your ass over in you're breaking the law, regardless of what color you are.
i guess this means you don't belive that racial profiling actually occors, LOL
I think if you are too stupid to know how a ballot works, i don't want you deciding who should be running the most powerful nation in the world for the next four years.
my old teacher who is one of the smartest people i have ever knomen lives in the disputed florda county and she had truble w/ the ballot
I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me crap or trying to guilt me into making "donations" to their cause. These people should be targets.
"Targets?" thats preety hars, mabye they wouldn't have to stand there if those republican oil barrons donated about .5% of thier income
I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes two parents.
even if thier drunks?
I believe if she has her lips on your Willie, it's sex, and this applies even if you are the President of the United States.
why do you care who thew president had sex w/? shouldn't that be his own bussness even if he is the president?
If this makes me a BAD American, then yes, I'm a BAD American.
no your not a bad amarican, you just need some far left brain washing :D :D
We need our country back!
when did we lose it, oh yea when that idiot, g.w. bush became president and let all big bussness get off the hook and didn't stop the terroists
GOD BLESS THE U.S.A. :D :D
JOhnG
06-28-2002, 04:39 PM
Originally posted by mr_dove
I also think that there are way too many people on this board to seem to have something up their A$$. Some people here seem to get offended at ANYTHING relating to fags (not gay, fags) , minorities or anything else.
it really makes me sad to see that kind of stuff fag is the equvilent of nigger and you know if you ever called a black persond "a ****ing nigger" you would get your ass wooped by everyone but the KKK so why is it okay to say " ****ing fag." it's the same thing
JOhnG
06-28-2002, 04:39 PM
wow it automaticaly sensors ****
LeatherFace
06-28-2002, 06:38 PM
Originally posted by ibismojo
cigarettes? or are those called figs in England....
You are correct, but mr_dove was not talking about cigarettes in his post...:angry:
ridetoofast
06-28-2002, 11:03 PM
im surprised and saddened to see this facet added to the RM board. two subjects that almost can never be discussed without passions flaring are politics and religion. there are enough things in this world that "spin me tight" without having to see it here...i know, i know, just don't look right? well i did and some of things I read i find truly disturbing.
gun control: do people really think that if you outlaw them (guns) people will no longer die at the hands of others using them? aren't criminals aka "outlaws" called that for a reason. look at any major city(new york, dc, chigcao) where STRICT gun laws are in place and crime is RAMPANT. aside from that, our founding fathers had a very GOOD reason for the common man to be armed. look at any recent civil unrest/government turmoil and you'll likely see the first thing that occured was the confiscation of private arms. shouldn't it concern you that the government YOU elected doesn't trust YOU, a law abiding citizen to own a firearm?...this topic in and of itself can rage on and on...this is just my two cents.
racism/intolerance: why is it that the scarlet letter/phrase "RACISM" is only ever bandied (sp?) about in one direction? the actions of the likes of the Reverend Al Sharpton, and Jesses Jackson, were they to be carried out by that most insideous demogrpahic sector WHM White Heterosexual Male, they would be CRUICIFIED by the establishment media. i could sample a few 'ghansta' lyrics, and if the message of said lyrics were reversed and directed in the opposiste direction....well im sure you can figure out what would happen. the point is racism goes BOTH ways. im am SO tired of race always having to be an issue...
why is it that if i dont agree with the agressive tactics of GLAAD and the likes I am intolerant? what happened to my right to find something disagreeable? why should children be assaulted at a grade school age with discussions about "alternative lifestyles" when all they should be caring about is playing tag or the likes?
english as a primary language: does the phrase 'balkinization' mean anything to anyone out there? im not saying that immigrants should be chained to a desk with their eyelids taped open and brainwashed to speak english, but if english is not deemed neccessary, or worse yet, if bilinguialism (sp?) becomes a standard, what incentive is there to learn the language and become an intergral part of this society? there are several states that are recanting the bi-lingual education standard in favor of immersion to facilitate an accelerated learning curve and quicker acclimation to the academic environment.
it takes a village: party affiliation aside, how much more supremely arrogant can the unamed author be than to tell parents how to raise their own children?
lips on the willie: that act of sex had nothing to do with it...it was the perjury and obstruction of justice that occurred after said event that was so offensive.
florida fiasco: interpreting indentations of chad? please...
let the machine count it
and perhaps the most disappointing of all, whether we are guests or not, RM is IMHO to be a moderator, and yet his reply was replete was sarcasm and indignation
Zonic Man
06-30-2002, 02:19 PM
Originally posted by ridetoofast
im surprised and saddened to see this facet added to the RM board. two subjects that almost can never be discussed without passions flaring are politics and religion. there are enough things in this world that "spin me tight" without having to see it here...i know, i know, just don't look right? well i did and some of things I read i find truly disturbing.
and perhaps the most disappointing of all, whether we are guests or not, RM is IMHO to be a moderator, and yet his reply was replete was sarcasm and indignation
Word.
dg806
07-01-2002, 01:20 PM
Originally posted by SHWA
Owning a gun makes you a smarter american?????? where do you come up with this sh*t? Were not fighting for our indepenence from england anymore........you dont need to own a deadly weapon.
Oh yeah?? What ya gonna do when late one night a burgler breaks into your house and has another gun or some type of weapon he intends to kill you with? Robberies? Car highjackings? Name it! If it happened to you wouldn't you want to protect yourself? I know I would. I not going to let some drug induced criminal take me out of this world or more importantly one of my family members, for what? A few measly dollars? I suppose your one of the bleeding heart liberals too!
I'm a bleeding heart liberal, with a nice (and growing) collection of guns. Never felt the need to keep any around for home protection though. Must just live in a good neighborhood.....
http://www.salon.com/comics/tomo/2002/07/01/tomo/story.jpg
Damn True
07-01-2002, 02:12 PM
Gun control = using two hands.
ridetoofast
07-01-2002, 03:29 PM
Originally posted by Damn True
Gun control = using two hands.
amen brother :D, or sic. sarcasm...gun control=privalegded/elite(yes)...joe schmoe (no)
Dog Welder
07-03-2002, 06:46 PM
Originally posted by Certified Drunk
We need our country back!
God BLESS THE U.S.A.
Who took away our country? England? I know black folks sure don't own the country. Back to when? 1950's values? Where minorities HAD to sit in the back of the bus. Where Japanese-AMERICANS where forced out of their property and incarcerated into detention camps? Or even now with American citizens being held indefinitely being held in PRISON because they are accused of being terrorists. Whatever happened to innocent till proven guilty? This ain't communist China..or is it? S#it like this didn't happen hundreds of years ago...I'm willing to bet that some of you were alive then. I'm done..arguing over the internet is pointless. To many cowards soap boxing on the internet.
Buddha bless the USA.
Slice
07-04-2002, 12:34 AM
argue. So I will pick "we need our country back". We can't go back 50 years, but we could go back to a time when people had self respect, not self pride. A time when if you stubbed your tow on your friends porch it was your fault for being clumsy. When you could fire someone who doesn't fit your organization without worrying about a law suit (sorry ZM). When you could RIDE A GOD DAMN SINGLE TRACK without some jerk off inviro nazzi trying to kill you. When imagrants came here to be americans and only the most ignorant americans couldn't appreciate it. When special interest groups didn't run our government. And finally, when you could tell the difference between a demicrat and a republican.
One more, a time when you could have yor own opinion and no one really cared what it was, except you.
Did this time ever exist?
Brian HCM#1
07-04-2002, 12:44 AM
Originally posted by Slice
argue. So I will pick "we need our country back". We can't go back 50 years, but we could go back to a time when people had self respect, not self pride. A time when if you stubbed your tow on your friends porch it was your fault for being clumsy. When you could fire someone who doesn't fit your organization without worrying about a law suit (sorry ZM). When you could RIDE A GOD DAMN SINGLE TRACK without some jerk off inviro nazzi trying to kill you. When imagrants came here to be americans and only the most ignorant americans couldn't appreciate it. When special interest groups didn't run our government. And finally, when you could tell the difference between a demicrat and a republican.
One more, a time when you could have yor own opinion and no one really cared what it was, except you.
Did this time ever exist? Well put Judy:)
Dog Welder
07-04-2002, 03:48 PM
Originally posted by Slice
argue. So I will pick "we need our country back". We can't go back 50 years, but we could go back to a time when people had self respect, not self pride. A time when if you stubbed your tow on your friends porch it was your fault for being clumsy. When you could fire someone who doesn't fit your organization without worrying about a law suit (sorry ZM). When you could RIDE A GOD DAMN SINGLE TRACK without some jerk off inviro nazzi trying to kill you. When imagrants came here to be americans and only the most ignorant americans couldn't appreciate it. When special interest groups didn't run our government. And finally, when you could tell the difference between a demicrat and a republican.
One more, a time when you could have yor own opinion and no one really cared what it was, except you.
Did this time ever exist?
Excellent points...did this time ever exist?...I don't think so cuz if you did go back to a time where a sembelence (sp?) of what you're talking about existed...you'd also have to go back to all the negatives of that time...ie. Cyndi Lauper, neon pink leg warmers, big hair, and sport coats rolled up at the sleaves...I think I can say for all of us that we don't ever want to go back to that era.
cwbastian
07-02-2003, 06:19 PM
God, I hate whiney, mealy-mouthed liberals who think they can spend MY money better than I can by flushing it down some goverment rat hole disguised as a "program". We've paid for 40 years of such "programs" and public housing is still full of degenerate crackheads who steal from decent people while living off their tax dollars. Oh yeah, I also hate misinformed pussies who think gun control equals safety. Stupid ****s.
Wow a blast from the past. 12 month old thread rolls back up to the top......
LordOpie
07-02-2003, 07:10 PM
Originally posted by cwbastian
God, I hate whiney, mealy-mouthed liberals who think they can spend MY money better than I can by flushing it down some goverment rat hole disguised as a "program". We've paid for 40 years of such "programs" and public housing is still full of degenerate crackheads who steal from decent people while living off their tax dollars. Oh yeah, I also hate misinformed pussies who think gun control equals safety. Stupid ****s.
I'm guessing you can do a better job running things? Hmm, wait, the government's red tape is slower than your response to this thread, so you have my vote!
BurlyShirley
07-02-2003, 07:38 PM
I guess Im a horrible F***ing american, because i agree with both ted nugent and george carlin. Actually, i guess most people serving in the US military who are willing to die are horrible americans because id venture to guess that they'd agree with alot of what was said. Go figure.:rolleyes:
racisms seems to be a hot topic these days on RM!
LordOpie
07-02-2003, 10:20 PM
Originally posted by rbx
racisms seems to be a hot topic these days on RM!
not just these days since this thread is a year old.
Jorvik
07-03-2003, 12:38 AM
Mmmm... Year old thread...
I agree with everything Ted Nugent said.
ALEXIS_DH
07-09-2003, 05:15 PM
maybe because most soldiers are hot blooded guys with minds trained to obbey rather than think.
basically there are only 2 things a soldier is good for. to kill and be killed. unfortunately.
and any other is just a product of these 2.
and that romanticed idea of soldiers that die for their country is not so exact, actually most modern wars are not fought because of real freedom , or because somebody is gonna kill all your family, or enslave you.
most modern wars are fought for economic reasons, and when a soldier die, is not because he is protecting his family or country, its because he died defending the economic interests of some group.
also most soldiers are in the army because its a job, and because they get paid and get benefits and dying is a risk of their profession, not the ultimate act of giving to their country.
we just get that romanticed idea because they need to attract new recruits, and selling the idea of "heroic death" kinda makes up for the idea of having a dangeous job.
if soldiers where ad honorem volunteers fighting an independance or defensive war, then we can talk about heroic deaths.
else, are just mercenaries who can have with very good intentions, nonetheless.
well, jorge luis borges said once "am a writer because i was not stupid enough to be in the army"
go figure
now, go ahead and bash me.
Originally posted by BurlySurly
I guess Im a horrible F***ing american, because i agree with both ted nugent and george carlin. Actually, i guess most people serving in the US military who are willing to die are horrible americans because id venture to guess that they'd agree with alot of what was said. Go figure.:rolleyes:
BurlyShirley
07-11-2003, 03:06 AM
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
maybe because most soldiers are hot blooded guys with minds trained to obbey rather than think.
Your point is taken, but i get the feeling that you've misinterpreted what i meant in the first place. Regardless of why anyone joins the military, they're still the one's doing alot of the dirty work for the country. They complete tasks ordered down directly from the ones in charge of the country. They're doing the will of the voters (in theory) and hence, putting their lives on the line for the average joe. They work for America.
To insinuate that one must be stupid to join the army (or any military branch for that matter) is an unfair, uninformed and illogical projection. As you said "soldiers are in the army because its a job, and because they get paid and get benefits, " which seems perfectly logical to me. The added bonus is serving your country.
Id also be willing to bet that many veterans of wars that did indeed help keep much of the world free would be so called "bad americans" because of their conservative values.
Oh, and jorge luis borges can kiss my a$$ because i joined the Marines to become a writer.
ALEXIS_DH
07-12-2003, 04:58 PM
Originally posted by BurlySurly
Your point is taken, but i get the feeling that you've misinterpreted what i meant in the first place. Regardless of why anyone joins the military, they're still the one's doing alot of the dirty work for the country. They complete tasks ordered down directly from the ones in charge of the country. They're doing the will of the voters (in theory) and hence, putting their lives on the line for the average joe. They work for America.
To insinuate that one must be stupid to join the army (or any military branch for that matter) is an unfair, uninformed and illogical projection. As you said "soldiers are in the army because its a job, and because they get paid and get benefits, " which seems perfectly logical to me. The added bonus is serving your country.
Id also be willing to bet that many veterans of wars that did indeed help keep much of the world free would be so called "bad americans" because of their conservative values.
Oh, and jorge luis borges can kiss my a$$ because i joined the Marines to become a writer.
ok, they are doing the will of the ones in charge, who are supossed to decide based on the will of voters and defend the average joe.
this is what u think, and history can prove you wrong.
the decision of going to war or not, is seldom based on the well being of the average joe (remember vietnam), but on the interest of those who want to go to war.
only in the cases i described before a war is fought for the average joe.
any other war is fought under the direction of some economic groups supporting the ones making the decisions.
think about this, who benefits more in a war? an average joe? or the guys getting all the bids for weapons? or the ones who will explote the resources that are in 99% of wars, which is the real reason of the wars.
who makes the ultimate decision of going to war? the average joe? or the guys who get the bigger benefit?
the benefit to the average joe, is just a collateral (does this word sound familiar?).
dont go to far and just think of most wars fought recently. what was there to win for the invader? and what was there to loose for the invader? in the present, according to UN resolutions, its illegal to conquer territory by war, but its not ilegal to economically explote resources conquered by war. this is a "legitimization" of the war process, by making it appear less brutal.
think of pakistan and india, they fight the land because of the resources it has, and the land itself that is a resource.
what about the US-mexican war? again, for land and its resources, there was no freedom to fight for there.
wwii? germany taking over europe, maybe the rest of the allies were fighting for their freedom, but the primary objective of the invaders were the resources, land and people (who are the ultimate economic resource)
there are very few wars in the world fought were ultimate and true objective is the protection of the average joe. (but i dont recall any right now)
the real reason of most wars is economic. there is no such thing as a defensive war when u strike first. whoever strikes first is the invasor, any other definition is BS and contrary to the definition of aggressor. thats the one the one whose objective decided the war. the other, the defendant, who usually is the original owner of the resources. so the real reason there, is not the freedom of the defendant, but the objective of the aggressor.
it may sound really ugly, in fact, war is discusting under economic reasons, but think of all the honorable us soldiers killed in the last war. and think of the real benefit for the guys who 2 weeks after when there were still bullets being fired; won the licitations for the oil.
for example, now tell me thats not totally disrespectul with those dead soldiers. and meassure the benefit to the average american, paying 10 cents less at the pump, and then think of the benefits of those who proposed, supported and pushed for the war to go. and then tell people the average joe the war was for their ultimate benefit.
thats the real benefit, and the 10 cents saving is the colateral benefit.
the other thing, about the WMD, the inminent attack from iraq, and all that crap are just subjective conclusions based on forged papers that haven been validated yet, so their value is still in discussion and very unlikely to be validated. and since the actual risk hasnt been defined, then its impossible to argue whether those lives were worth a, so far, forged risk.
dont think am a communist, anarchist or some crap like that,
actually am the perfect example of the product of globalized corporations and conservative economic models, i was raised in south america went to brittish schools, go to college in the us, vacation in mexico, use products made in china and write this from a computer made in japan, in a lab built with german technology.
i eat, live and go to school because of the benefits from them. but that doenst put a blind in my eyes.
Alexis
BTW: when JLB said he wasnt stupid enough to join the army, he meant that some degree of stupidity is required to perform tasks without questioning, regardless reason, and against self-conservation instinct. which is a "virtue" soldiers must have to be good.
gonna have a hard time writting real literarute if you cant interpretate that.
BurlyShirley
07-12-2003, 06:54 PM
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
gonna have a hard time writting real literarute if you cant interpretate that.
Well that entire post was quite a bore. This really wasnt meant to open up a debate on why wars are fought, but rather on the views of those fighting them. Not to say that its completely irrelevant, but it did nothing to discount what i said in my last post.
:o:yawn.
Dont feel the need to break simple sh** like this down for me chief, JLB (whom i will admit to having never read, but am taking from his entirely out of context quote) obviously does not posess the virtue of dedication. What you call "stupidity" others call valor. I can already see the viewpoint (however illogical) from which you are standing, so i dont feel it will do any good to try and convince you of the opposite, however, Id ask that instead of simply bashing the idea of warfighters who are actually patriots, you take a minute or two to speak with one...perhaps at a local nursing home or VFW. You may find some not-so-stupid individuals with some very intersesting things to say. You probably wont do it, because once most people are tuned into a certain way of thinking, theres almost never any turning back. Even if you did, youd probably write the guy off as senile or something anyway. Bah!
ALEXIS_DH
07-12-2003, 07:10 PM
i've already done that. i used to volunteer at a hospital for poor people (FYI 33% of male homeless are veterans - National Coalition for Homeless Veterans data)
those can be nice stories, and they are very respectable persons, whose good will may be out of question and are convinced they are patriots and are sincere about it, but thats not the point.
the point is whether those who sent them to war were patriots.
they were just pawns in a huge chess game. they might be sincerely convinced in what they were made to believe. its very unlikely the real reasons they fought were the ones they think.
the point is whether the real reasons they fought were patriotic or not, not if they are patriotic or not. their view is subjective, and there is also a need for some stupidity, as borges suggested, not to see farther than the inmediate hero fable.
stupidity and ignorance are the main requirements to be sincerely wrong.
u can get good stories in the army, but there are 2 kinds of writters, those who write sentences beyond their words, and those who tell a story. the success of a writer is not in the story, but how it is told. just read Julio Cortazar, JLB or Sartre.
Alexis
Originally posted by BurlySurly
Well that entire post was quite a bore. This really wasnt meant to open up a debate on why wars are fought, but rather on the views of those fighting them. Not to say that its completely irrelevant, but it did nothing to discount what i said in my last post.
:o:yawn.
Dont feel the need to break simple sh** like this down for me
chief, JLB (whom i will admit to having never read, but am taking from his entirely out of context quote) obviously does not posess the virtue of dedication. What you call "stupidity" others call valor. I can already see the viewpoint (however illogical) from which you are standing, so i dont feel it will do any good to try and convince you of the opposite, however, Id ask that instead of simply bashing the idea of warfighters who are actually patriots, you take a minute or two to speak with one...perhaps at a local nursing home or VFW. You may find some not-so-stupid individuals with some very intersesting things to say. You probably wont do it, because once most people are tuned into a certain way of thinking, theres almost never any turning back. Even if you did, youd probably write the guy off as senile or something anyway. Bah!
BurlyShirley
07-12-2003, 08:20 PM
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
those can be nice stories, and they are very respectable persons, whose good will may be out of question and are convinced they are patriots and are sincere about it, but thats not the point.
Alexis
No, that is the point. In fact, that was my only point. That many of those serving in the military are "bad americans". Go and re-read my first post on this particular topic and ask yourself why you're arguing.
Also, once again, you needn't try and explain to me the dynamics of creative writing or the theory behind it. Not that anyone couldnt use improvement, but in what position are you, and what about me do you know to be giving such advice?
ALEXIS_DH
07-12-2003, 08:33 PM
Originally posted by BurlySurly
No, that is the point. In fact, that was my only point. That many of those serving in the military are "bad americans". Go and re-read my first post on this particular topic and ask yourself why you're arguing.
Also, once again, you needn't try and explain to me the dynamics of creative writing or the theory behind it. Not that anyone couldnt use improvement, but in what position are you, and what about me do you know to be giving such advice?
so far, that u are a soldier who wants to be a writer, but hasnt read JLB and thinks the army will give u the chance to be a writer.
yeah, the point is if u cant tell when u are doing something not good because u dont realize that what u r doing is not good; then you'd think u r doing right.
thats when the stupidity requirement comes in handy. u cannot notice without being somewhat stupid.
and because of this virtue, they are bad americans. one's ability to be "bad american" is proportional to one's inability to realize the underlying ideas of those statements.
the sky is not only the roof one lives under.
plus i love to argue :D
manimal
07-12-2003, 08:43 PM
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
maybe because most soldiers are hot blooded guys with minds trained to obbey rather than think.
hmmm, i thought that's what universities were for.
ALEXIS_DH
07-12-2003, 09:21 PM
Originally posted by manimal
hmmm, i thought that's what universities were for.
hmmmm?????????????????????? that was totally non-sense.
again a prime example of u-can-only-agree-if-cant-understand-what-it-means.
BurlyShirley
07-12-2003, 09:33 PM
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
so far, that u are a soldier who wants to be a writer, but hasnt read JLB and thinks the army will give u the chance to be a writer.
plus i love to argue :D
No,
Im not a soldier who wants to be a writer. Im a Marine who "is" a writer. In fact, and i hate gloating, i was recently recognized as the Marine Corps Print Journalist of the Year for 2002. I was also the top active duty writer in the entire department of defense for that year. I also do tons of extra work for websites around the net which provides me with quite an income boost and am currently on my way to finishing this journalism degree.
Also, when one signs their name to a contract, ensuring the govenrment to obey whatever lawful orders are given, i wouldnt consider it stupidity to stand by my signature. i often do not agree with what im doing, but its not my job to formulate policy, only to enforce it. Stupidity is nowhere in the equation. You yourself earlier said that joining for money was perfectly logical right?
Your last comment, to manimal, can go either direction. Im in the midst of seeing both sides.
ALEXIS_DH
07-12-2003, 09:39 PM
Originally posted by BurlySurly
No,
Im not a soldier who wants to be a writer. Im a Marine who "is" a writer. In fact, and i hate gloating, i was recently recognized as the Marine Corps Print Journalist of the Year for 2002. I was also the top active duty writer in the entire department of defense for that year. I also do tons of extra work for websites around the net which provides me with quite an income boost and am currently on my way to finishing this journalism degree.
Also, when one signs their name to a contract, ensuring the govenrment to obey whatever lawful orders are given, i wouldnt consider it stupidity to stand by my signature. i often do not agree with what im doing, but its not my job to formulate policy, only to enforce it. Stupidity is nowhere in the equation. You yourself earlier said that joining for money was perfectly logical right?
Your last comment, to manimal, can go either direction. Im in the midst of seeing both sides.
yup, and that again is not the point. standing by your signature is not stupid.
but trusting your life blindly to some person (no matter if its a higher ranked guy, for whom lives are just part of the cost of winning objective) is definately stupid.
think of all the soldiers used for testing nuclear bombs, who were
never told of the tests. if somebody decide u r gonna be the next, then u r fini.
thats the point of all am talking about. the willingness of being a soldier to fight wars declared on the reasons i wrote before.
thats where the stupidity am talking about is. it would be bravery if u r a volunteer fighting an independance or blablabla or if u were autonomous.
but being subject to orders no questions asked. thats the stupidity borges lacked.
BurlyShirley
07-12-2003, 10:36 PM
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
yup, and that again is not the point. standing by your signature is not stupid.
but trusting your life blindly to some person (no matter if its a higher ranked guy, for whom lives are just part of the cost of winning objective) is definately stupid.
with each post, it becomes more and more obvious how little you actually understand about how the military works...
You wouldnt know the first thing about trusting your life to someone in a combat situation. One of the first things you would learn, if you studied the military is how the best leaders earned the respect and faith of their men. There is no blind trust...only blind obedience...this obedience does not come through stupidity, it comes through discipline. It comes through practice and training. Each person marching onto a battlefield knows that his life is in jeapordy. This does not make him stupid. It makes him no stupider than the cable Tv repairman who dangerously climbs telephone poles for a living, or the alaskan crab fisherman who take thier boats into absurdly dangerous waters. Its simply the job that needs to be done.
ALEXIS_DH
07-13-2003, 12:22 AM
Originally posted by BurlySurly
Each person marching onto a battlefield knows that his life is in jeapordy. This does not make him stupid.
its different, if a repairman doenst want to climb the pole if he doesnt want to. he doenst have to go to martial court for that. he still have the choice of the degree of jeopardy he wants so take. for a soldier, it doenst depend on him, but on his position in the formation or arrival time, which is decided not by him but by somebody else.
what's the difference between blind obidience or blind trust? either way your life is the colateral of the mortage.
the cable company doesnt send u a repairman team knowing 60% are doing to die.
if a construction worker dies, its because his mistake or a machine accident, not because he was sent somewhere to be shot at.
a construction worker goes to work knowing he's a risk of dying, the same as an electricist or an accountant, to some degree or other. BUT they dont blindly have confidence in a leader because they are told so. there is no way the ability to have blind confidence should be a quality people should look for.
the elecricist doenst bite 10kv cables because his superior told so, a soldier will go into landmines no questions asked. there is no trainning required here, there is no mental exercise, no choice, no self. just do it because u r told so. all the thinking about your destiny was already done by others.
just thinking, hell yeah i signed the contract this is my job and i'll walk over landmines because am told so. u dont show a lot of intelligence by doing so.
regular people's lives ultimately depend on the risks they are willing to take each moment and everytime. a soldier doesnt.
his life ultimately doesnt depend on his training, it depends on where a higher ranked guy wants him to be, or on the ability of the opponent to shoot him down. on the risks others want to put his life thru.
if he's told to kill, he either kills, get killed or goes to jail. there are no romantic ideals there, as u said, its a job that has to be done. just those stupid enough to have blind confidence in somebody else, no matter how smart or whatever this person may be, will be giving up their life ultimate choices to somebody else, because they got this obidience through "trainning", which just teaches them to act without asking, thinking or reasoning.
just like the definition of stupid "...marked by or resulting from unreasoned thinking or acting".
if they want to send to u a place were u are 99% likely to die, they will, and giving this power of decision over your life to somebody else is really stupid.
then they will give u honors and a lot of stuff, but well, u r already dead or missing a leg.
LordOpie
07-13-2003, 12:35 AM
I'm so glad ALEXIS doesn't run our country or we'd be living in Nazi America now :rolleyes:
ALEXIS_DH
07-13-2003, 12:37 AM
Originally posted by LordOpie
I'm so glad ALEXIS doesn't run our country or we'd be living in Nazi America now :rolleyes:
hell no, am almost a hippie by US standards. :eviltongue:
it only applies to soldiers.
isnt any army a fascism already?
manimal
07-13-2003, 11:49 AM
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
hmmmm?????????????????????? that was totally non-sense.
again a prime example of u-can-only-agree-if-cant-understand-what-it-means.
ok, let me break it down for you, since you're so educated in the ways of real life.
you believe that serving in the military involves stupidity because you are following "blindly" the direction of others -to save your life-
i believe that you are blindly following the theories and teachings of those whom you have never met and you know nothing of their true character except that which is written in a book.
-so-
blindly following someone of whom i've seen in action, witnessed their character and trust my life with is stupid? unfortunately alexis, some of us have to do the not so nice and/or fun things in life such as being there in times of danger blah,blah, blah... and some of us have chosen to be one of those people. do you think that we're all just a bunch of sheep following the shepard to the slaughter? are we all just a bunch of brainwashed dimwits?
remember, blindly trusting someone, especially with your life, is not a sign of stupidity but of submission and an understanding of what really matters. we learn early on in the military that we don't know everything and it's better to trust those who've been there before than to "blindly" go on our own. the latter is, i believe, where you are alexis; afraid to give in and realize that you learn more when you follow first.
so is a soldier only good for 2 things? i suppose you'll never know because "u-can-only-agree-if-cant-understand-what-it-means".
now go back to blindly following your professors ideals and let us idiots allow you to do so :rolleyes:
BurlyShirley
07-13-2003, 12:54 PM
First you say,
i used to volunteer at a hospital for poor people (FYI 33% of male homeless are veterans - National Coalition for Homeless Veterans data)
those can be nice stories, and they are very respectable persons, whose good will may be out of question and are convinced they are patriots and are sincere about it, but thats not the point.
the point is whether those who sent them to war were patriots.
Then you say,
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
BUT they dont blindly have confidence in a leader because they are told so. there is no way the ability to have blind confidence should be a quality people should look for.
just thinking, hell yeah i signed the contract this is my job and i'll walk over landmines because am told so. u dont show a lot of intelligence by doing so.
:confused: WTF? Dude. Do you even realize how little sense you're making right now?
Archslater
07-13-2003, 04:57 PM
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
hell no, am almost a hippie by US standards. :eviltongue:
it only applies to soldiers.
isnt any army a fascism already?
I think what LordOpie meant was that if you were running the country, we wouldn't have a military, and Hitler would have taken over.
I may have mis-interpreted though.
LordOpie
07-13-2003, 06:30 PM
Originally posted by Archslater
I think what LordOpie meant was that if you were running the country, we wouldn't have a military, and Hitler would have taken over.
I may have mis-interpreted though.
thanks Arch, that's very close and I could only shake my head that Alexis didn't even come close to understanding.
More specifically tho, Alexis would have done such a poor job of running the military as the commander that we'd all be royally screwed.
But Alexis has his/her collegiate head so far up it's own rectum that I figured I'd be wasting my time explaining.
I just love academics who have no real world experience attempting to explain how things are or should be. I can only hope that Alexis is NOT a graduate assistant who's been forced to teach a few classes... GAs make the worst teachers :(
valve bouncer
07-14-2003, 10:03 AM
Originally posted by LordOpie
I just love academics who have no real world experience attempting to explain how things are or should be.
Almost as bad as twenty something military types doing the same thing isn't it?:rolleyes: ;)
Anyway I'm not sure if being dumb qualifies you for military service, although I'm sure as far as the generals are concerned it probably helps. No, I think being poor means you're more likely to end up in the front lines. Rich men start the wars and the poor fight them. Way of the world.
BurlyShirley
07-14-2003, 05:56 PM
Originally posted by valve bouncer
Almost as bad as twenty something military types doing the same thing isn't it?:rolleyes: ;)
Anyway I'm not sure if being dumb qualifies you for military service, although I'm sure as far as the generals are concerned it probably helps. No, I think being poor means you're more likely to end up in the front lines. Rich men start the wars and the poor fight them. Way of the world.
The difference, ballsack, is that im not trying to speak for the other side;)
ALEXIS_DH
07-16-2003, 11:25 PM
Originally posted by BurlySurly
First you say,
Then you say,
:confused: WTF? Dude. Do you even realize how little sense you're making right now?
their lack if inteligence or decision doenst have anything to do with their honorability, of their good will.
again, u can be sincerely wrong, u just need to be ignorant and a bit stupid.
ALEXIS_DH
07-16-2003, 11:28 PM
Originally posted by manimal
. do you think that we're all just a bunch of sheep following the shepard to the slaughter? are we all just a bunch of brainwashed dimwits?
remember, blindly trusting someone, especially with your life, is not a sign of stupidity but of submission and an understanding of what really matters. we learn early on in the military that we don't know everything and it's better to trust those who've been there before than to "blindly" go on our own. the latter is, i believe, where you are alexis; afraid to give in and realize that you learn more when you follow first.
now go back to blindly following your professors ideals and let us idiots allow you to do so :rolleyes:
hmm, so if a soldier is not a sheep going to the slaughter house, what it is?
it doens matter if you trust the decisions about your life to the smartest guy on earth, its still being silly giving away those rights.
ALEXIS_DH
07-16-2003, 11:38 PM
Originally posted by LordOpie
thanks Arch, that's very close and I could only shake my head that Alexis didn't even come close to understanding.
More specifically tho, Alexis would have done such a poor job of running the military as the commander that we'd all be royally screwed.
But Alexis has his/her collegiate head so far up it's own rectum that I figured I'd be wasting my time explaining.
I just love academics who have no real world experience attempting to explain how things are or should be. I can only hope that Alexis is NOT a graduate assistant who's been forced to teach a few classes... GAs make the worst teachers :(
hmm, i dunno, of course i'd have more genuine remorse about sending them to death, but i'd would have sent them over, just like age of empires!!! :D
no, seriously, is heroic to be the defensive guys, i said that before. but being in the other side is rather discusting.
either way, no wars would start if aggressors were not starting wars. instead of asking something so unlikely and remote as me being a general, ask if wwii was avoidable.
both are as unknown, unlikely and remote.
LordOpie
07-16-2003, 11:49 PM
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
either way, no wars would start if aggressors were not starting wars.
wow! You're insight is astounding.
Originally posted by ALEXIS_DH
instead of asking something so unlikely and remote as me being a general, ask if wwii was avoidable.
both are as unknown, unlikely and remote.
WWII being avoidable is unknown... huh? :confused:
*gary coleman voice*
Whatcha smoking Willis?