PDA

View Full Version : LOL @ L'OPie


N8
02-04-2008, 12:14 PM
Very H8R of you to delete ur thread

:busted:

$tinkle
02-04-2008, 12:18 PM
sounds like somebody's got the case of the mondays (http://caseomondays.ytmnd.com/)

N8
02-04-2008, 12:24 PM
I dont know who is more of a moron.. Bush or the Dimcratic Congress who cant figure out how to foil his diabolical plans.

I mean he is a retard right??

$tinkle
02-04-2008, 12:30 PM
I mean he is a retard right??if he had a vagina, i'd think he'd be walking around an outdoor market only seconds from blowing up.

N8
02-04-2008, 12:34 PM
if he had a vagina, i'd think he'd be walking around an outdoor market only seconds from blowing up.


All those vastly intellectual congress person should be able to see him coming!!!

narlus
02-04-2008, 12:43 PM
if he had a vagina, i'd think he'd be walking around an outdoor market only seconds from blowing up.

must spread rep....


na te, has it taken you this long to notice the arm that cheney's got jammed up bush's rectum?

N8
02-04-2008, 12:45 PM
must spread rep....


na te, has it taken you this long to notice the arm that cheney's got jammed up bush's rectum?

jeebus NO! did u see that online someplace?

:eek:

N8
02-04-2008, 01:27 PM
i read at lunch about how Alan Greenspan predicts the US economy to grow by 2/4 by the year 2030. Invisible Hand!!!

LordOpie
02-04-2008, 01:28 PM
What's the point?

Clearly there was no discussion to be had.

N8
02-04-2008, 01:29 PM
What's the point?

Clearly there was no discussion to be had where i can assign blame of everything on a single person in the US government.

prolly not...

:)

$tinkle
02-04-2008, 01:32 PM
gotta be quicker than that on the edit when n8's around, loopie.

fluff
02-04-2008, 01:41 PM
i read at lunch about how Alan Greenspan predicts the US economy to grow by 2/4 by the year 2030. Invisible Hand!!!

Would that be same as 1/2? I thought he was supposed to be good with numbers.

Oh, and there is no invisible hand.

N8
02-04-2008, 01:42 PM
Would that be same as 1/2? I thought he was supposed to be good with numbers.

Oh, and there is no invisible hand.

typo my good fluff.. a typo..

should be: 3/4 bigger as in 75% more

$tinkle
02-04-2008, 01:48 PM
Would that be same as 1/2? I thought he was supposed to be good with numbers.

Oh, and there is no invisible hand.that's ironic you would find fault with his post then go on to assert the non-existence of a negative. did you have afternoon tea from russell's teapot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot)?

N8
02-04-2008, 01:49 PM
that's ironic you would find fault with his post then go on to assert the non-existence of a negative. did you have afternoon tea from russell's teapot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot)?

I get all my info from:

http://www.economictrends.org/

SPINTECK
02-04-2008, 01:51 PM
most economies double every 10 to 12 years, so you are saying we are set back in our economic development by 1/2 normal rate, ie., 200% normal over the next 20 years or 8/4 in your math language.

N8
02-04-2008, 01:53 PM
most economies double every 10 to 12 years, so you are saying we are set back in our economic development by 1/2 normal rate, ie., 200% normal over the next 20 years or 8/4 in your math language.

Cool... liberal speak.

An increase is actually a cut

nice

fluff
02-04-2008, 02:08 PM
that's ironic you would find fault with his post then go on to assert the non-existence of a negative. did you have afternoon tea from russell's teapot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot)?

Unlike Bertrand's teapot, Adam's invisible should be noticeable by its effects. Sadly these are not present, nor is a free market a perfect system. Such are the realities of economics, even for the USA.

I'm not convinced that describing invisibility as a negative is entirely accurate.

$tinkle
02-04-2008, 02:13 PM
I'm not convinced that describing invisibility as a negative is entirely accurate.there you go AGAIN!!!

fluff
02-04-2008, 02:27 PM
there you go AGAIN!!!

It's not deliberate, I can't help myself.

$tinkle
02-04-2008, 02:31 PM
It's not deliberate, I can't help myself.well plaid.
i think we should take this somewhere else; these plebes can't appreciate our collective dizzying intellect. i'd recommend cheeseman park, but don't want to have to explain to Serial Midget & loopie what we're doing there.

N8
02-04-2008, 02:36 PM
well plaid.
i think we should take this somewhere else; these plebes can't appreciate our collective dizzying intellect. i'd recommend cheeseman park, but don't want to have to explain to Serial Midget & loopie what we're doing there.

:popcorn:

this akin to watching a one of those ubber trendy french arthouse flix...

yeah, i dont speak french either.

X3pilot
02-04-2008, 06:29 PM
well plaid.


Fluff is Scottish??!?!?