Children of the Sanitorium

[LordOpie]

http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/santorumqa9.jpg

wow, psycho kids... lazy emo, crazy eyes and absolutely psycho girl with chuckie doll in same clothes.

[Westy]

That is one scary picture. What kind of parent makes their kids go through something like that?

[Silver]

Holy ****. There's 1000 words against the Republican social agenda right there...

[SPINTECK]

you know you're talking about future senators. at least i won't vote for them.

[manimal]

"mommy, your hands are soooo cold!!!!"

"shut up and smile you stupid doll toting chubby girl!!!"

[ALEXIS_DH]

lol, the adams!

[LordOpie]

"mommy, your hands are soooo cold!!!!"

fvcking zombies

[skatetokil]

why would you bring them to the stage?

[Reactor]

"mommy, your hands are soooo cold!!!!"

"shut up and smile you stupid doll toting chubby girl!!!"

lol! that's great.


Call the gene splicing specialists.

[sanjuro]

I know that is a bad picture, but their dad just got the biggest beatdown of his life.

Anyone get fired here? What did you say to your children after you got home?

[Silver]

I know that is a bad picture, but their dad just got the biggest beatdown of his life.

Anyone get fired here? What did you say to your children after you got home?

You know, I don't know many parents who take their kids to work with them to help clean out the ole office...

[LordOpie]

I know that is a bad picture, but their dad just got the biggest beatdown of his life.

Anyone get fired here? What did you say to your children after you got home?

in addition to what Silver said... really, look at that photo again. They're fvcking loony. Like Rob Zombie and the House of a 1000 Congress kinda loony.

[glivingston5]

hm...... ya thats creepin me out a little

[alwaysbroncin19]

Holy ****. There's 1000 words against the Republican social agenda right there...

And this post points out how shallow, and spineless you freaks are. If Rick was standing in front of you hoes you wouldn't speak a word of what you will post. Pvssies. (yeah, I'd say it to you personally) No hard feelings though right you butt:pirate2:

[dropkick]

Hello creepy new avatar.

[Silver]

And this post points out how shallow, and spineless you freaks are. If Rick was standing in front of you hoes you wouldn't speak a word of what you will post. Pvssies. (yeah, I'd say it to you personally) No hard feelings though right you butt:pirate2:

Hey, my dad didn't bring me to his job last time he got fired as a prop. Two times ago he did, but he asked me to leave the doll at home...

That girl's crying like she found out that Rick's been fvcking the family dog. And with conservative Christian Republican standards lately, I wouldn't be surprised...

Maybe when Rick asks the dog to come he's not asking the same thing you and I are?

[stevew]

I know that is a bad picture, but their dad just got the biggest beatdown of his life.

Anyone get fired here? What did you say to your children after you got home?
It wouldn't be "Come share the agony of defeat with me in front of millions on national TV."

[sanjuro]

I hate f*cking Santorum, and I have to admit the kids are freaky. But I don't like picking on kids...

[valve bouncer]

I hate f*cking Santorum, and I have to admit the kids are freaky. But I don't like picking on kids...

I'm with stupid. It wasn't cool when the frothers did it to Chelsea Clinton and it's not cool now. They can't help it if their dad is a c*nt.

[neanderthal]

"Children of Sanitorum"-- Sounds perfect for the making of a Steven King movie.

[MudGrrl]

you don't think I'd tell him that he's a hate mongering sexist fvck?


I think he dragged his kids up there to show the voters that they ousted a family. Not just him.... his whole family.

Feel sorry for the kids.... but he's an @ssmaster.

[N8]

who cares really?

you should take this over to thDUmmies on the democraticunderground where it's the subject of a couple dozen threads already.

plus you can type "fcvk" for real.

enjoy!

:)

[BurlyShirley]

The little one is especially ugly.

[LordOpie]

I hate f*cking Santorum...

umm, don't?

Unless meth is involved.

[LordOpie]

who cares really?


I feel the tide has turned and now the Repubs will feel what they've been giving... mwuhahahahaha.

Too bad the Dems don't have a mouthpiece as evil as Rush.

[Westy]

I feel the tide has turned and now the Repubs will feel what they've been giving... mwuhahahahaha.

Too bad the Dems don't have a mouthpiece as evil as Rush.


You really want all the same bull**** politics just put in reverse? I know it won't happen but I just like to see this country's leadership act just that, like leaders, not bitchy little girls stabbing each other in the back so they can become captain of the chearleading squad.

[MudGrrl]

http://www.wonkette.com/assets/resources/2006/11/santorumconcedes.jpg


I like the son.
That's pretty funny.

[RenegadeRick]

You sir, are a master of opinions. Let's take a moment here and analyze your statements...

Holy ****. There's 1000 words against the Republican social agenda right there...And this post points out how shallow, and spineless you freaks are.
I know Silver needs no defense, but shallow and spineless? How can you know this? Ad Hominem opinion.

If Rick was standing in front of you hoes you wouldn't speak a word of what you will post.
Hoes? Ad Hominem again. And how can you know what any other person will or will not do? Maybe they would and maybe they would not. But all you got here is... opinion.

Pvssies.
Ad Hominem opinion. Starting to notice a pattern yet?

(yeah, I'd say it to you personally)
Finally! Something you CAN know. What YOU will do. :clapping:

No hard feelings though right you butt:pirate2:
Ad Hominem opinion... or wait... maybe this is not an opinon. Maybe butt:pirate2:in' is something you have PERSONAL knowledge of.

[LordOpie]

http://www.wonkette.com/assets/resources/2006/11/santorumconcedes.jpg


I like the son.
That's pretty funny.

so very awesome. Flippin' off the whole nation. Ok, son is no longer scary eyes dude. We'll call him Donnie Darko.

[Secret Squirrel]

http://www.myconfinedspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/santorumqa9.jpg

wow, psycho kids... lazy emo, crazy eyes and absolutely psycho girl with chuckie doll in same clothes.

No wonder the kids' are messed....dad's a douche and mom seems to have a stroke disorder....

"I need mah pillz...."

[robdamanii]

The son looks possessed. Where's the pea soup?

[kidwoo]

And this post points out how shallow, and spineless you freaks are. :

About as ironic as calling someone you know nothing about a butt pirate on teh interwebs.


If Rick was standing in front of you hoes you wouldn't speak a word of what you will post.

This actually hits a personal note. Can't speak for fellow ass colonal silver (although we share the same pimp) but I've wanted for years to meet santorum in person. I've wanted to drop trou and grab his cute little butt cheeks for years..........chase him around the parking lot with a pitchfork in hand and a fetus in my pocket while blaring some cher or barbara streisand, my willy flappin in the breeze with a slight list in his direction. Really explore things and get to the heart of his convictions.

[Old Man G Funk]

I just wonder how freaked those kids looked when Rick brought home his dead kid from the hospital and cuddled with it.

[MudGrrl]

I just wonder how freaked those kids looked when Rick brought home his dead kid from the hospital and cuddled with it.


oh, yeah.... totally forgot about that one:shocked:

[kidwoo]

That's why they all look like that. It's not just that appearance in particular.

[narlus]

I just wonder how freaked those kids looked when Rick brought home his dead kid from the hospital and cuddled with it.

did that really happen? :twitch: :twitch: :twitch:

[narlus]

and btw, fvck Santorum. he was the one who made some really assinine comment about the catholic priest molestation problem:

It is startling that those in the media and academia appear most disturbed by this aberrant behavior, since they have zealously promoted moral relativism by sanctioning "private" moral matters such as alternative lifestyles. Priests, like all of us, are affected by culture. When the culture is sick, every element in it becomes infected. While it is no excuse for this scandal, it is no surprise that Boston, a seat of academic, political and cultural liberalism in America, lies at the center of the storm.

nice one rick. and here's a good riposte:

Reread it. Nope, try it again. Does it make sense yet? It's hard to wade through his guarded and passive syntax, but I think if one draws out the logic and translates it to plain English, you'd end up with something like "If people I call leftists think gay sex is good, and I think gay sex equals child molestation, then leftists think child molestation is good." Hey, thanks a lot for equating my monogamous, consensual and healthy relationship with repressed perverts raping and molesting children who are taught to trust them with their deepest secrets by an institution that is covering up a global phenomenon and often takes no action at all!

[kidwoo]

did that really happen? :twitch: :twitch: :twitch:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61804-2005Apr17.html

[N8]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61804-2005Apr17.html

tough to criticize someone for that.

the death of your child effects you in lots of ways.

[sanjuro]

And this post points out how shallow, and spineless you freaks are. If Rick was standing in front of you hoes you wouldn't speak a word of what you will post. Pvssies. (yeah, I'd say it to you personally) No hard feelings though right you butt:pirate2:

The Internet is not the place for sympathy or good taste, so calling these guys out is a waste.

But I did think more about this. Concession speeches are a necessary part of elections because you do need to address your supporters who worked very hard on your campaign.

But there is nothing in the Senator's Handbook that says you need to trot your family on stage. I know Santorum, even if never turns on the TV again, will regret embarassing his family and causing them suffering.

No one should laugh at children in the public eye, but ultimately it was Santorum's fault.

P.S. I would Nelson-laugh right in his face about losing, just not in front of his family.

[Secret Squirrel]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61804-2005Apr17.html

People actually voted for this piece of crap? Wow....Just the way he conducts himself (political stance aside) is disturbing.

[Old Man G Funk]

tough to criticize someone for that.

the death of your child effects you in lots of ways.

I don't know about that. There's something screwy with taking a dead newborn home to cuddle and kiss it with your three live children.

[kidwoo]

tough to criticize someone for that.

the death of your child effects you in lots of ways.


Gabriel, in which his tiny physique is framed by his father's hand. <snip>

He and Karen brought Gabriel's body home so their children could "absorb and understand that they had a brother," Santorum says. "We wanted them to see that he was real," not an abstraction, he says. Not a "fetus," either, as Rick and Karen were appalled to see him described --


His son was a fetus. A baby, child, brother, a human, cannot be framed by an adult hand. It was the beginnings of these concepts, not their full realization. This says nothing about his right to mourn the situation which I fully support.

So no, it's not tough. It's kind of creepy. The fact that someone else brought it up in this thread is proof that I'm not the only one who thinks so. He's a freak, with freak ideas that he tries to legislate over others who don't share and should not be subjected to his mania. It's unfortunate that this particular one is of the most mild variety in light of some of his other beliefs. (see homosexuality and it's ties to beastiality and incest)

So yes, because of who he is and the manner in which he expresses his views, I gladly criticize him when his twisted views show themselves in somewhat sick ways.

[neanderthal]

People actually voted for this piece of crap? Wow....Just the way he conducts himself (political stance aside) is disturbing.

You would not believe the number of people here in Western PA that have not taken down their Santorum for Senate signs that were they placed in their yards.

[N8]

His son was a fetus. A baby, child, brother, a human, cannot be framed by an adult hand. It was the beginnings of these concepts, not their full realization. This says nothing about his right to mourn the situation which I fully support.

So no, it's not tough. It's kind of creepy. The fact that someone else brought it up in this thread is proof that I'm not the only one who thinks so. He's a freak, with freak ideas that he tries to legislate over others who don't share and should not be subjected to his mania. It's unfortunate that this particular one is of the most mild variety in light of some of his other beliefs. (see homosexuality and it's ties to beastiality and incest)

So yes, because of who he is and the manner in which he expresses his views, I gladly criticize him when his twisted views show themselves in somewhat sick ways.


i bet i can find something much creepier done by a liberal canidate. would the disgust still be the same?

[.:Jeenyus:.]

i bet i can find something much creepier done by a liberal canidate. would the disgust still be the same?

I highly doubt you can find anything more creepy than that from either party...

:twitch:

[N8]

I highly doubt you can find anything more creepy than that from either party...

:twitch:

how much?

[$tinkle]

http://www.google.com/search?q=sheehan+uterus&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official

[kidwoo]

http://www.google.com/search?q=sheehan+uterus&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official

yes. creepy

N8: simpleton..........I don't choose whether something is creepy etc because of a party affiliation. That's not what I said in my last post either bright boy. Creepy is creepy. Especially when it's an offshoot of some wacked out religious BS.

[Westy]

Be better if it was actually sitting there on the side of the road however. Saying and doing differentiate in this case.


N8: simpleton..........I don't choose whether something is creepy etc because of a party affiliation. That's not what I said in my last post either bright boy. Creepy is creepy. Especially when it's an offshoot of some wacked out religious BS.

You forget that N8 sees everything in terms of party affiliation. It makes things easier for simple minds. Republican good, democrat bad.

[kidwoo]

You forget that N8 sees everything in terms of party affiliation. It makes things easier for simple minds. Republican good, democrat bad.

Hah.....you saved the post before I edited it. stinky's links had a bunch of "songs about" and "cindy says"........after reading deeper she actually did plant it there.:shocked:


But no......I never forget the forum short busser.

[$tinkle]

almost forgot about this, too: tomcat to eat placenta (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=16958010&method=full&siteid=94762&headline=exclusive--tom-chews-name_page.html); maybe he could get a good kimshee recipe from this.

[kidwoo]

almost forgot about this, too: tomcat to eat placenta (http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=16958010&method=full&siteid=94762&headline=exclusive--tom-chews-name_page.html); maybe he could get a good kimshee recipe from this.

I have to know what political affiliation those two are before passing judgement on creepy. I ran it through the spreadsheet I've got and the result was "tom cruise?-------fag"

[sanjuro]

i bet i can find something much creepier done by a liberal canidate. would the disgust still be the same?

It has nothing to do with politics. The first point made was the Santorum children look weird, which they do.

Do you think bringing home a fetus is a partisan issue? I think it is just weird, and I am sure some voters in Penn thought the same way.

Hey, a lot of people hate Clinton for his personal acts, although I think coercing a young woman for a bj is perfectly normal.

[Reactor]

And this post points out how shallow, and spineless you freaks are. If Rick was standing in front of you hoes you wouldn't speak a word of what you will post. Pvssies. (yeah, I'd say it to you personally) No hard feelings though right you butt:pirate2:



Actually, I'll say every word, and a hell of a lot more. Rick and his ilk should crawl back under their rocks and stop trying to impose his values on my family, in my house. I don't worship his god, and neither did the founding fathers, and I don't want my daughter growing up in his perverted vison of America.

[LordOpie]

Rick and his ilk should crawl back under their rocks and stop trying to impose his values on my family, in my house.

Honest and sincere question... didn't the Republicans promote and believe in smaller, less intrusive govt? Or did I misunderstand something back in history class all those years ago?

[Old Man G Funk]

Honest and sincere question... didn't the Republicans promote and believe in smaller, less intrusive govt? Or did I misunderstand something back in history class all those years ago?

Not the current incarnation of the Republican party.

[syadasti]

Honest and sincere question... didn't the Republicans promote and believe in smaller, less intrusive govt? Or did I misunderstand something back in history class all those years ago?

You mean real republicans like Goldwater (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater). Most of those went extinct years ago :disgust1:

Goldwater viewed abortion as a matter of personal choice, not intended for government intervention. In fact, his own daughter, Joanne, chose to have an abortion before her first marriage at the age of 20, and he supported her decision. He was also not against gays in the military. As a passionate defender of personal liberty, he saw the religious right's views as an encroachment on personal privacy and individual liberties. In his 1980 Senate re-election campaign, Goldwater won support from religious conservatives but in his final term voted consistently to uphold legalized abortion.[citation needed] Even in matters of foreign policy, Goldwater disagreed with Reagan and his supporters; he opposed the decision to mine Nicaraguan harbors. Notwithstanding his prior differences with Dwight Eisenhower, Goldwater in a 1986 interview rated him the best of the seven Presidents with whom he had served.

After his retirement, in 1987, Goldwater described the conservative Arizona Governor Evan Mecham as "hardheaded" and called on him to resign, and two years later stated the Republican Party had been taken over by a "bunch of kooks." In a 1994 interview with the Washington Post the retired Senator said, "When you say 'radical right' today, I think of these moneymaking ventures by fellows like Pat Robertson and others who are trying to take the Republican Party and make a religious organization out of it. If that ever happens, kiss politics goodbye." He said about Jerry Falwell, founder of the Moral Majority, "I think every good Christian ought to kick Falwell right in the ass," in response to Falwell's opposition to the nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor to the Supreme Court where Falwell said, "Every good Christian should be concerned." [3]

In the 1990s he became more controversial because of statements that aggravated many social conservatives. He endorsed Democrat Karan English in an Arizona congressional race, urged Republicans to lay off Clinton over the Whitewater scandal, and criticized the military's ban on homosexuals: "Everyone knows that gays have served honorably in the military since at least the time of Julius Caesar." He also said, "You don't have to be straight to be in the military; you just have to be able to shoot straight." In 1996 he told Bob Dole, who mounted his presidential campaign with luke-warm support from hard-line conservatives, "We're the new liberals of the Republican Party. Can you imagine that?"

[Old Man G Funk]

You mean real republicans like Goldwater (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater). Most of those went extinct years ago :disgust1:
Yeah. The latest incarnation has found that appealing to social issues (gay hating, anti-abortion, etc.) is a much more efficient way of bringing the rubes to the polls and voting for anyone with an (R) next to their name.

[Reactor]

Yeah. The latest incarnation has found that appealing to social issues (gay hating, anti-abortion, etc.) is a much more efficient way of bringing the rubes to the polls and voting for anyone with an (R) next to their name.

The current republician party is all about vote pandering and enriching themselves. Their main skill is doublespeak. Their version of fiscal responsibility is doubling the national debt. Their version of a less intrusive government is to lock you up if you don't conform.

The gay marriage bans are a perfect example. Either marriage is a religious sacrament or a civil contract. If it's a holy "sacrament" then it's up to each religion to decide what it means, and who can marry. If it's a civil contract, then the state has no business in applying one religion's values to it. Personally I think the term "marriied" should stricken from the tax code and replaced with household. A household would be defined as one or more income earning adults AND one or more dependents.

The modern republican party wants more regulation of people and less of business. That's what smaller government means to them.

[$tinkle]

Yeah. The latest incarnation has found that appealing to social issues (gay hating, anti-abortion, etc.) is a much more efficient way of bringing the rubes to the polls and voting for anyone with an (R) next to their name.exactly.
if i found out my wife got a hold of some gay monkey sperm & her lover turkey basted her, & she got ectopically pregnant, i'd so be honor killing her.

that's how we roll up in the 719, yo.

[Old Man G Funk]

Personally I think the term "marriied" should stricken from the tax code and replaced with household. A household would be defined as one or more income earning adults AND one or more dependents.
I agree that "married" should be stricken, but your definition of "household" leaves out couples who either don't have kids or both work and are not dependents of each other.

[Old Man G Funk]

exactly.
if i found out my wife got a hold of some gay monkey sperm & her lover turkey basted her, & she got ectopically pregnant, i'd so be honor killing her.

that's how we roll up in the 719, yo.
Are you denying that the Reps. have tried to hammer social issues down our throat for votes in the last umpteen elections?

[$tinkle]

Are you denying that the Reps. have tried to hammer social issues down our throat for votes in the last umpteen elections?phrased like so, i tend towards agreeance.
phrased like previous, not so much.

[Old Man G Funk]

phrased like so, i tend towards agreeance.
phrased like previous, not so much.
What's the dif?

[$tinkle]

gay-hating not a social issue.

special rights =/= equal rights.

[stevew]

We'll call him Donnie Darko.
How about "Future Secretary of Defense"...

http://www.causapopular.com.ar/IMG/jpg/Donald_Rumsfeld-2.jpg

[Old Man G Funk]

gay-hating not a social issue.

special rights =/= equal rights.

Who said anything about special rights?

And, gay hating is certainly a social issue.

[$tinkle]

Who said anything about special rights?it's the standard conservative resistance to gay rights, as they are presented as special rights.
And, gay hating is certainly a social issue.perhaps with a wink & a nod, but not as a plank in the platform. most of what you see is ingnorance, which breeds fear, which can (unfortunately) breed hate.

seems to be a well-played political stand-by wrt:
- our country's becoming a theocracy
- if we don't bomb the browns, we'll have suicide bombers in all our sbarro's inside 2 weeks.
- social security will be bankrupt by 2015
- your gun rights are eroding
- the atheists are going to burn all the bibles

[Old Man G Funk]

it's the standard conservative resistance to gay rights, as they are presented as special rights.
Which is playing semantics to trump up a social issue.
perhaps with a wink & a nod, but not as a plank in the platform. most of what you see is ingnorance, which breeds fear, which can (unfortunately) breed hate.

seems to be a well-played political stand-by wrt:
- our country's becoming a theocracy
- if we don't bomb the browns, we'll have suicide bombers in all our sbarro's inside 2 weeks.
- social security will be bankrupt by 2015
- your gun rights are eroding
- the atheists are going to burn all the bibles
Good list.

[Reactor]

I agree that "married" should be stricken, but your definition of "household" leaves out couples who either don't have kids or both work and are not dependents of each other.

The exact wording would have to be discussed. The "married" tax status was supposed to give adults raising the next generation a break on taxes. I'm not sure if Dual Incone No Kids couples should qualify for that for household status, regardless of their sexual orentation or marital status. On the other hand the aging of the country has left a lot of adults having to care for their elderly parents. Which makes them a household with dependents, which should get a pretty sizable tax break in my book.

[RenegadeRick]

Not sure about the intentions of the married tax status, but for most families, there is a marriage penalty (http://www.savewealth.com/news/9905/marriagepenalty.html), not a benefit.

Perhaps the tax code is really written to punish those stupid enough to get married. Heck, :imstupid: too.

[Westy]

I don't understand the marriage penalty thing. If a couple files individually doesn't the tax code just consider them as individuals? Are people bitching because they both can't file individually and claim the same deductions?

[$tinkle]

I don't understand the marriage penalty thing. If a couple files individually doesn't the tax code just consider them as individuals? Are people bitching because they both can't file individually and claim the same deductions?it's to offset all the sex we marrieds have. it's rather amazing i have so much time to post here.

[dirtydirtysouf]

Hello creepy new avatar.


ahahahahahahahahahahah:clapping: :clapping:

[Old Man G Funk]

The exact wording would have to be discussed. The "married" tax status was supposed to give adults raising the next generation a break on taxes. I'm not sure if Dual Incone No Kids couples should qualify for that for household status, regardless of their sexual orentation or marital status. On the other hand the aging of the country has left a lot of adults having to care for their elderly parents. Which makes them a household with dependents, which should get a pretty sizable tax break in my book.
Taxes aren't the only concern, however. There's also spousal privilege, inheritance, visitation rights, power of attorney, etc.

Edit: Don't want to sound like I'm arguing, because I'm not. I just wanted to point out that there's more to things than dependents and tax status.

[RenegadeRick]

it's to offset all the sex we marrieds have. it's rather amazing i have so much time to post here.

Yeah... I'm sure that is it. :rolleyes: My johnson hurts from gettin' so much.

I don't understand the marriage penalty thing. If a couple files individually doesn't the tax code just consider them as individuals? Are people bitching because they both can't file individually and claim the same deductions?

I was forced to do some research and the Marriage Penalty for US Income tax actually ended in 2003. In 2002 (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i1040tt--2002.pdf), a couple making 40k and 44k each would have paid $16,483 on their combined 84k income if they were married, but only $15,386 if they were not married... an $1,100 difference. In 2005 (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1040.pdf), marrieds in the same financial situation will actually save $7 (woohoo!).

These tax rate savings are due to sunset in 2010 (http://marriage.about.com/od/finances/a/marriagepenalty.htm), and will come back to the full penalty rates unless Congress does something to stop it. With the Democrats now controlling Congress, what do you think will happen? :poster_oops:

[Reactor]

Taxes aren't the only concern, however. There's also spousal privilege, inheritance, visitation rights, power of attorney, etc.

Edit: Don't want to sound like I'm arguing, because I'm not. I just wanted to point out that there's more to things than dependents and tax status.

I don't take it as arguing. ;) I think there are a of of implications of "married" status in various federal laws that simply aren't true anymore. There would have to be a lot of discussion, and some haggling over wording.