PDA

View Full Version : (not so) proud to be an american


$tinkle
09-19-2006, 10:52 AM
Travis County debates weight-loss surgery as employee benefit (http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/printstory.mpl/metropolitan/4197253):

AUSTIN — Travis County is considering a pilot program to offer weight-loss surgery to its employees after a review suggested the move could save money in the long run.

County commissioners may decide today whether to pay for up to 15 bariatric surgeries per year during a five-year trial. The surgeries, which involve reducing the size of the stomach or rerouting the intestines, would each cost about $15,000 to $25,000, the county said.

"Unfortunately, the program is obviously very needed," County Judge Sam Biscoe said. "We do have more than our fair share of employees who qualify."

To qualify, county employees would have to be diagnosed with morbid obesity and go through one year of monitored unsuccessful dieting and exercise. The county estimates that 300 to 400 of its 4,100 employees would be eligible for the surgery.

While an annual review of the county's health care plan found that the surgeries could save money, the county's staff has not provided conclusive data, Biscoe said.

Commissioner Gerald Daugherty said the pilot program is a worthwhile test of whether the policy will work. He said it would take only a fraction of the county's $60 million health care budget.

"To me, it's a calculated way to see if we can help ourselves out since we're self-insured," he said.

Susan Smith, executive director for the Texas Municipal League's Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool, said Texas cities that have covered bariatric surgeries found them to cost more than anticipated.

The high costs caused the cities to scale back their coverage, she said, adding that Travis County's cost estimates are probably too low.

The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services estimates that 60 percent of Americans are overweight or obese. It says weight-loss surgery has been found to help with conditions such as diabetes, asthma and hypertension.

Smith said the health benefits of weight-loss surgery prompted the municipal league to begin offering coverage starting next month. Its insurance will cover 50 percent of the cost, up to $30,000. The procedure will be available only to those who have demonstrated they cannot otherwise lose weight, she said.

kidwoo
09-19-2006, 10:57 AM
Although not entirely the representative body of the entire country, Texas is certainly the core of everything lame about america.

I'm just proud to not be a texan. Daily.

BurlyShirley
09-19-2006, 10:58 AM
What regular Americans think about Texas is what the rest of the world thinks about America.

you can use that as a sig if you like. :clue:

Old Man G Funk
09-19-2006, 10:58 AM
The procedure will be available only to those who have demonstrated they cannot otherwise lose weight, she said.
Are there people who simply can not lose weight?

Silver
09-19-2006, 11:07 AM
Are there people who simply can not lose weight?

It's hard to exercise when you're 450 pounds.

A cheaper way to handle this would be to give them all AIDS and keep medicinal marijuana illegal...

$tinkle
09-19-2006, 11:22 AM
The procedure will be available only to those who have demonstrated they cannot otherwise lose weight, Are there people who simply can not lose weight?how does one "demonstrate" not being able to move their fat ass, while at the same time being an employee?

it reads:To qualify, county employees would have to be diagnosed with morbid obesity and go through one year of monitored unsuccessful dieting and exercise.moreover, could this be used to screen potential employees? i s'pose there could be a sliderule that determines asset:liability ratio, much like any other measure for employment

BurlyShirley
09-19-2006, 11:24 AM
how does one "demonstrate" not being able to move their fat ass, while at the same time being an employee?

it reads:moreover, could this be used to screen potential employees? i s'pose there could be a sliderule that determines asset:liability ratio, much like any other measure for employment

happens all the time w/ government jobs. no fatties in the military. no fattie flight attendants either.

jimmydean
09-19-2006, 04:20 PM
happens all the time w/ government jobs. no fatties in the military.

I guess you have never seen our National Guard. There are guys in my unit that have not passed an APFT or height/weight ever. Some have been in 10+ years.

biggins
09-19-2006, 04:39 PM
heres a good cost effective weight loss plan:stop eating so much and get off your ass.......

reflux
09-19-2006, 04:51 PM
To qualify, county employees would have to be diagnosed with morbid obesity and go through one year of monitored unsuccessful dieting and exercise. The county estimates that 300 to 400 of its 4,100 employees would be eligible for the surgery.
DAMN!!! That's a hell of a lot of morbidly obese:shocked: :eek:

Changleen
09-19-2006, 05:25 PM
Wouldn't it be even cheaper just to make them into soap?

stevew
09-19-2006, 05:58 PM
Wouldn't it be even cheaper just to make them into soap?
Ever since Hitler, that is kind of frowned upon.

Silver
09-19-2006, 06:06 PM
Ever since Hitler, that is kind of frowned upon.

Hitler liked dogs too. Does that mean I have to hate dogs?

(No one else likes my AIDS idea? Or we can airdrop them over Burundi and let nature take it's course. Imagine huge preserves where morbidly obese white people from the US roam, protected from poachers...)

Secret Squirrel
09-19-2006, 06:57 PM
Hitler liked dogs too. Does that mean I have to hate dogs?

(No one else likes my AIDS idea? Or we can airdrop them over Burundi and let nature take it's course. Imagine huge preserves where morbidly obese white people from the US roam, protected from poachers...)

Or not....

narlus
09-19-2006, 07:35 PM
mmm....poached fat texan....

kidwoo
09-19-2006, 08:07 PM
What regular Americans think about Texas is what the rest of the world thinks about America.

you can use that as a sig if you like. :clue:

Yeah but that's only BECAUSE of TEXAS!!!!!!!!

So unfair.

dan-o
09-20-2006, 10:07 AM
Seems like an expensive solution. Wouldn't it be easier to simply shame the obese into losing weight? No more plus size fashion (that's a striking mumo, john), no widening seats on public transportation, excess weight fees on airlines.....the possibilities are endless.