"I don't need your civil war"

[Brunettes]

For those that are concerned about our future :rolleyes:

Your thoughts on Iraq...I'll jump in when I don't like what you have to say :rofl:

[robdamanii]

Um, PD forum?

[Brunettes]

haha wow I didn't know there was one on here...I think I found my new home.


Delete this or whatever.

[BurlyShirley]

You give em a dictatorship, they kill each other
You free them of the dictatorship, they kill each other
You draw a cartoon, they kill people

you cant win

[Brunettes]

I'm starting to think that Saddam knew the only way to keep them under control. I know there were alot innocent people that were killed by him but at least they wern't getting blown up when they go to the market.
Now we're being blamed for the Mosque bombing...it's time to leave and write it up in the history books as "the time U.S. made a big mistake"

[BurlyShirley]

I'm starting to think that Saddam knew the only way to keep them under control. I know there were alot innocent people that were killed by him but at least they wern't getting blown up when they go to the market.
Now we're being blamed for the Mosque bombing...it's time to leave and write it up in the history books as "the time U.S. made a big mistake"
Isnt one day of freedom better than a lifetime of imprisonment, though?

[DirtyDog]

Isnt one day of freedom better than a lifetime of imprisonment, though?

That's some idealistic BS right there. Man, you are wading in it these days.

[BurlyShirley]

That's some idealistic BS right there. Man, you are wading in it these days.
So you think life under a dicatator is better, then? Thats awesome. I suppose you think slavery should still be around because too many people died in our civil war.

[N8]

Kill them all and let Allah sort 'em out..?

:confused:

[ALEXIS_DH]

You give em a dictatorship, they kill each other
You free them of the dictatorship, they kill each other
You draw a cartoon, they kill people

you cant win


i´m really having the same thoughts about certain parts of the world.. SA included....

[Brunettes]

Kill them all and let Allah sort 'em out..?

:confused:

No need for us to do anything, they'll do it themselves. Everyone wants their piece of the land back..then you've got the ones that want power, they've all got religous problems and it makes for something that will never end.

If we don't start saving our resources and military we're screwed, end of story. With all the "security" we're still weak right now and when WWIII (Iran) comes in a few years (maybe months?) we're going to be exhausted in every way.

[DirtyDog]

So you think life under a dicatator is better, then? Thats awesome. I suppose you think slavery should still be around because too many people died in our civil war.

I'll just keep quoting you while you continue to exponentially increase the dumb factor of your posts.

[Changleen]

I'll just keep quoting you while you continue to exponentially increase the dumb factor of your posts.I dunno, your sig is pretty dumb.

[Transcend]

So you think life under a dicatator is better, then? Thats awesome. I suppose you think slavery should still be around because too many people died in our civil war.

Better then being worried I'll be blown up if i step outside, or shot by either side, or kidnapped for talking to a foreigner?

Yep.

[DirtyDog]

I dunno, your sig is pretty dumb.

You love my sig.

[Changleen]

You love my sig.Kinda. It's getting old now though. You yanks have a working, room temperature tabletop fusion reactor now though, if you want to update it.

Edit 2 (That was the wrong link - Lazy Googling):

Old:http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7315&feedId=online-news_rss20
New: http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/ny_team_confirms_ucla_tabletop_fusion_10017.html

[BurlyShirley]

Better then being worried I'll be blown up if i step outside, or shot by either side, or kidnapped for talking to a foreigner?

Yep.

Blood is freedom's stain, canuck.

[fluff]

Isnt one day of freedom better than a lifetime of imprisonment, though?
Ain't that what they're fighting for?

[ohio]

Blood is freedom's stain, canuck.

And illegal wiretapping is freedom's chalk outline.

[BurlyShirley]

And illegal wiretapping is freedom's chalk outline.
Id say its more freedom's ear ache.

[kidwoo]

Blood is freedom's stain,


You have that on the back of your truck or embroidered on your jean jacket don't you?

[noname]

And illegal wiretapping is freedom's chalk outline.
actually it's perfectly legal to intercept comunications coming into and originating from the U.S. aimed at a know enemy, as long as one end of the communication is not U.S. based. If I called germany during WWII it would be legitimate to tap the call. That precedent was set and tested during the Carter administration. :nonono:

[kinghami3]

Blood is freedom's stain, canuck.
But who's blood are we talking about? It doesn't mean sh*t if it isn't our own.

[BurlyShirley]

You have that on the back of your truck or embroidered on your jean jacket don't you?
Maiden owns you!

[ohio]

actually it's perfectly legal to intercept comunications coming into and originating from the U.S. aimed at a know enemy, as long as one end of the communication is not U.S. based. If I called germany during WWII it would be legitimate to tap the call. That precedent was set and tested during the Carter administration. :nonono:
Which is why you'll note that I wrote illegal wiretapping. Yes, there is perfectly legal wiretapping that allows us to surveil pretty much anyone, even if the calls are purely domestic/internal. For some reason that wasn't sufficient for Bush et al, and he decided to conduct ILLEGAL wiretaps in addition to the legal ones.

The only reason I can possibly come up with was that he wanted to avoid even the minimal oversight of a retroactive, secret court. Why would he want to avoid that oversight? Well, while his motivation for doing it matters to me, at doesn't really matter to the law... which he very clearly broke.

[kidwoo]

Maiden owns you!

You's my powerslave beyotch.

[kidwoo]

Which is why you'll note that I wrote illegal wiretapping. Yes, there is perfectly legal wiretapping that allows us to survey pretty much anyone, even if the calls are purely domestic/internal. For some reason that wasn't sufficient for Bush et al, and he decided to conduct ILLEGAL wiretaps in addition to the legal ones.

The only reason I can possibly come up with was that he wanted to avoid even the minimal oversight of a retroactive, secret court. Why would he want to avoid that oversight? Well, while his motivation for doing it matters to me, at doesn't really matter to the law... which he very clearly broke.


But....but but........sean hannity said...........um uh........but but......

[dante]

ummm, to anyone who didn't see this coming they should really read their history books:

Marshall Tito (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josip_Broz_Tito)

and the

Yugoslav Wars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_wars)

Hmmm, one dictator holding a country together despite religious and ethnic diversity, and when said dictator dies (or is removed from power), Civil War breaks out. Hmmmmmmmmm. "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."

[fluff]

I think we'll get some kind of power-sharing agreement between Shia and Sunni that'll last just long enough for the US to pull out, then a civil war for a year or so before a dictator more palatable to the west takes power.