PDA

View Full Version : To take his name or not?


Snacks
12-21-2004, 07:10 PM
Okay so this isn't bike related, but I'd thought I'd toss this one out to the ladies.

To take the guys last name when you get married is a hot topic with my girlfriends. Most of them are getting married in their mid 30's, already established in their career and are choosing not to take the husbands last name.

What I have found that more men have an issue/opinion with this rather than the women. Why? Is marriage still looked as a possession to some? Are women looked at as the ones that wear the pants in the family when they don’t change their name?

I was married once before and did not change my name, just because I didn't really want to, my ex didn't have a problem with it, but I found that others did. My b/f and I are coming up on 4 years next month, and marriage is in the future, but I have been told in advance that I will be taking his last name.

So hunnies, what's your take on this topic....Did you? Didn't you? Will you? Won't you?

bibs
12-21-2004, 07:15 PM
Okay so this isn't bike related, but I'd thought I'd toss this one out to the ladies.

To take the guys last name when you get married is a hot topic with my girlfriends. Most of them are getting married in their mid 30's, already established in their career and are choosing not to take the husbands last name.

What I have found that more men have an issue/opinion with this rather than the women. Why? Is marriage still looked as a possession to some? Are women looked at as the ones that wear the pants in the family when they don’t change their name?

I was married once before and did not change my name, just because I didn't really want to, my ex didn't have a problem with it, but I found that others did. My b/f and I are coming up on 4 years next month, and marriage is in the future, but I have been told in advance that I will be taking his last name.

So hunnies, what's your take on this topic....Did you? Didn't you? Will you? Won't you?


hahaha, you guys are getting married!! RAD!! You should, hyphen-ated names are lame, so yuppie! ANd its kind od an insult to not take your mans name..."Ok, honey, I love you but not enought ot take your name, and in case we get a divorce its easier. And Im not a chick, but I saw this on the front page..so I ahd to respond! Sorry for entering the "Mud Hunnies, its a nice lil place you go there :D


Cory

Toshi
12-21-2004, 07:29 PM
My b/f and I are coming up on 4 years next month, and marriage is in the future, but I have been told in advance that I will be taking his last name.
:eek: hello snacks. i use View New Posts so i see all of this fun stuff :D

punkassean
12-21-2004, 07:37 PM
It's not about possession for me and I'd imagine for most guys too. It's just one of those things where you have to ask yourself why not? Don't not do something "just because".

I understand when stars do that so they can still get work but even then most of them legally change their name but just keep their maiden as a stage name.

If you love the guy then take his name for chrissakes! what's the big deal? It's not like the niddle east and women have to cover their faces and not speak and men can kill them for just about whatever w/o getting in trouble.

Freak
12-21-2004, 07:50 PM
You know, I don't see the big deal as to why the wife should take the husbands name....I let Laura make up her own mind on whether or not to take my last name.

Maybe the husband should take the wife's last name!!!! hehehehe

Snacks
12-21-2004, 07:58 PM
Maybe the husband should take the wife's last name!!!! hehehehe

We have tried that....we have been the McRyan's for about a year on goofy stuff!

Oh, and no Cory, we are not getting married in the near future. We are both at the point of why get married? We are both happy the way things are...I'm sure one day we'll get to the point of why not.

TreeSaw
12-21-2004, 08:19 PM
I am married and took my husband's name, although I don't believe I "had" to. We're not the typical couple so I doubt that he would have minded. If I could find him, I would ask him, but he's currently MIA :think: Really, our house isn't that big...but I haven't seen or heard him in about an hour :confused: LOL

I don't believe a woman should feel like she has to take her husband's name. Plus, it's a pain in the arse to fill out all of the paperwork and crap ;)

Side note (and I don't know why I thought of this because I have never even watched the show she's on) didn't Star Jones just get married and have her husband take her name?

Certified Drunk
12-21-2004, 08:31 PM
How about Mr and Mrs Trail-Snacks :)

Or Snacker-Hacks

punkassean
12-21-2004, 08:34 PM
Side note (and I don't know why I thought of this because I have never even watched the show she's on) didn't Star Jones just get married and have her husband take her name?

I think so but none of us should be looking for relevance to our lives in her life decisions. :D

TreeSaw
12-21-2004, 08:35 PM
I think so but none of us should be looking for relevance to our lives in her life decisions. :D
LOL! So true! I think the beers are going to my head :D

Snacks
12-21-2004, 08:50 PM
Side note (and I don't know why I thought of this because I have never even watched the show she's on) didn't Star Jones just get married and have her husband take her name?

OMG! She did! She also advertised for donations to help pay for their wedding :rolleyes: I was reading people (very reliable new source ;) ) and their wedding party was like 20 on each side!

punkassean
12-21-2004, 09:04 PM
OMG! She did! She also advertised for donations to help pay for their wedding :rolleyes:

my point exactly...

Star Jones = bad woman :nono:

Jr_Bullit
12-21-2004, 10:47 PM
I think it depends on the relationship - and your own personal preference. I went through three different names before I was 9 so to me a name is a name - it's not who you are, it's just what you sign.

My mom kept her family name when she married my stepdad, but I took my stepdad's name.

People who love tradition - then the whole name change thing for the woman makes sense.
People who wanna shake things up, invent a new name entirely upon marriage.
I do think, however, that those women who opt to keep their own name, do so as a way of showing the world they are maintaining their well-won independence - they are generally older ladies (late 20s and on) who have a career of their own, or have had a previous relationship where they did change their name and had to deal with the crap of changing it back afterwards.

It may also be regional - I have a few clients in the South who were married this year. At this point, I've known them since I started at the company, though we've never actually met, so they called and confided their happiness with me while introducing me to their replacements. All took their husbands name, all planned on being a stay at home wife with kids.

My girlfriend who is getting married this summer is taking her husbands name. They're a little more conservative in nature.

My supervisor who is in her 40s kept her name, and her husband who is 15 years younger than her kept his.

And I agree - the hyphenated thing gets old quick. At worst - change your middle name to be your last name, and add on the new name as your real last name.

Velocity Girl
12-21-2004, 11:37 PM
My question to guys who say women should change their name, would you be willing to change yours? If the answer is no, then why would you expect someone else to do the same? If the answer is yes, well then more power to you!

The first time around I still wasn't ready to deal with the crap that comes with changing your name and professionally didn't want it changed at that time. And I just wasn't ready to change it, plain and simple. The ex wasn't exactly happy with it, but ultimately didn't have much choice in the matter if he still wanted to marry me.

As Jason said, he always gave me the choice and actually expected at first that I was going to keep my name, but was happy when I told him I was going to change it. I'm happy I did, but it is an adjustment. I've been known by a name all my life, have nicknames around it, and now have to retrain my brain....not to mention the paperwork...yikes!!! I still think about 50% of my stuff is in my maiden name...LOL!

Some may claim that it's a pain dealing with different names, and if you have kids, etc. Growing up we had 2 last names in our family and then two of my brothers took on their birth names to give us a 3rd and it really isn't that bad...you just figure it out as you go. You and the people around you learn to adjust.

MtnBikerChk
12-22-2004, 08:05 AM
BAH - to the women who said it's a lot of paperwork - it's really not that bad. Most credit card companies didn't even want proof - they take your word over the phone.

and I agree with bibs "ANd its kind of an insult to not take your mans name..."Ok, honey, I love you but not enought ot take your name, and in case we get a divorce its easier."

I wonder what the stats are for divorce rates where the couple didn't share the same last name. I have a cousin who's wife kept her name. They are divorced now.

AND I think that people who can't share bank accounts have committment issues too - but that's another thread :D

I Are Baboon
12-22-2004, 08:15 AM
and I agree with bibs "ANd its kind of an insult to not take your mans name..."Ok, honey, I love you but not enought ot take your name, and in case we get a divorce its easier."


Of course, I left that entirely up to you. :) But I am glad you took my name. "Mrs. Baboon" just sounds so cool. :love:

laura
12-22-2004, 08:58 AM
i decided to make my maiden name my middle name and take tn's last name. i like his last name better anyways.


mbc is right about it not being a lot of paper work. i spent a total of 2 hours ( not consecutively) getting a new ss card and driver's liscence, passport and voter's registration card. everything else i did over the phone. some things i haven't even gotten changed yet because my drivers liscence still has my maiden name on it.


i certainly don't look at not changing your name as an insult, i think it is only a matter of personal preferance. if tn's last name had been assface, i probably wouldn't have changed my name. it is just a name. i just like being The Tn's. even thought about getting a cheesy welcome mat with our names on it. hehehe.

McGRP01
12-22-2004, 09:09 AM
My wife didn't "legally" take my name until this year, and we've been married for 7 years.

MtnBikerChk
12-22-2004, 09:24 AM
if tn's last name had been assface, i probably wouldn't have changed my name. it is just a name.

LMAO - Well that goes without saying!

Velocity Girl
12-22-2004, 10:11 AM
Those of who think it's an insult for the women to not change her name.....if the man was unwilling to change his name to hers instead would that be just as much of an insult?

I'm just wondering the reasoning. Is it just the women not changing hers that is insulting, or does it go both ways?

Snacks
12-22-2004, 10:14 AM
The first time around I still wasn't ready to deal with the crap that comes with changing your name and professionally didn't want it changed at that time. And I just wasn't ready to change it, plain and simple. The ex wasn't exactly happy with it, but ultimately didn't have much choice in the matter if he still wanted to marry me.



I think that is the main reason I didn't change mine the first time, I just wasn't ready. There wasn't any underlying issues in the relationship that made me feel that the marriage wasn't going to last so don't change it.

Snacks
12-22-2004, 10:15 AM
Those of who think it's an insult for the women to not change her name.....if the man was unwilling to change his name to hers instead would that be just as much of an insult?

I'm just wondering the reasoning. Is it just the women not changing hers that is insulting, or does it go both ways?

Oh, I'm right with you on this one too! When people say, if you love your man enough, change your last name. That reminds me of the peer presure in school to have sex.....'Baby, if you love me you'll have sex with me' :nono:

biggins
12-22-2004, 10:27 AM
c'mon now, its not insulting for the woman not to take the last name but it is part of becoming married traditionally. So having said that i think that if that tradition is being slowly done away with in many marriages then maybe other traditions should be skirted around as well. Traditions such as buying the woman two rings. Her engagement ring and her wedding band, i think just one ring will suffice. Maybe we should not have bridesmaids and groomsmen either. Or how about instead of throwing the bouqet we just start a tradition of lighting it on fire and throwing it at each other.

DH Diva
12-22-2004, 10:29 AM
I'm one of those people who has a dying last name. It's really rare and I believe there are less than 100 people in the country with the name (and the numbers just keep getting smaller). Given the number of male progeny in the last couple decades, theres very few people to carry on the name. Because of that for some reason, I really want to keep my name (if I ever actually get married!!!).

MtnBikerChk
12-22-2004, 10:32 AM
I'm just wondering the reasoning. Is it just the women not changing hers that is insulting, or does it go both ways?

to me, it's both ways. it's like one of those 'sacrafice for the one you love kinda thing.'

It's such an insignificant part of life. Change it, don't change it, move on. :blah:

Slugman
12-22-2004, 10:38 AM
So for women who do not switch - do you just change the "Ms." to "Mrs."?
And does (or did) this cause any confusion?

I guess I'm traditional in the sense that I think the woman should take the last name, it shows a commitment. Hell, he or his family is paying (traditionally) a lot of money for the wedding, the least you could do is take his name... :sneaky:

I found snacks comment a bit odd:
I think that is the main reason I didn't change mine the first time, I just wasn't ready. There wasn't any underlying issues in the relationship that made me feel that the marriage wasn't going to last so don't change it.

Then why did you get married?

I guess that is the thing for me, if my wife didn't take my name then she would still have the same identity that she had when single... and why would you not want everyone to know that you were now married?!?!?! To me it was a sense that she still wanted her identity from her 'swinging singles' days, and that raises some issues with trust and commitment.

In the end, I let my wife choose - she took my name.

DH Diva
12-22-2004, 10:43 AM
Hell, he or his family is paying (traditionally) a lot of money for the wedding, the least you could do is take his name... :sneaky:



Actually it's the other way around. Traditionally, the family of the bride pays for most of the wedding.

Snacks
12-22-2004, 10:44 AM
So for women who do not switch - do you just change the "Ms." to "Mrs."?
And does (or did) this cause any confusion?

I guess I'm traditional in the sense that I think the woman should take the last name, it shows a commitment. Hell, he or his family is paying (traditionally) a lot of money for the wedding, the least you could do is take his name... :sneaky:

I found snacks comment a bit odd:


Then why did you get married?

I guess that is the thing for me, if my wife didn't take my name then she would still have the same identity that she had when single... and why would you not want everyone to know that you were now married?!?!?! To me it was a sense that she still wanted her identity from her 'swinging singles' days, and that raises some issues with trust and commitment.

In the end, I let my wife choose - she took my name.

It had nothing to do with not letting people know I was married, I wore a ring, had joint accounts, bought a house....blah blah blah. Just because I didn't change my name it means it means I'm not committed to my marriage? We were together for 5 years before we got married, had been working together for 6 years(met at work)...needless to say my swinging single days :rolleyes: were over long before we were married.

Slugman
12-22-2004, 10:48 AM
Actually it's the other way around. Traditionally, the family of the bride pays for the wedding.
D'oh ... your right

I need more coffee (stil early here).

Edit - was thinking about my own wedding (still paying it off)

llkoolkeg
12-22-2004, 11:06 AM
My opinionated take:

women who take their husband's surname.......... :heart:
women who refuse their husband's surname.........:rolleyes:
women who hypenate their-husband's surname... :rolleyes:
couples who make up a new name altogether..... :help:
men who take their wife's surname...............:nuts:

Unless you are the preeminent force in your specialized profession, you are not so famous that people can't adapt to your new name...unless, of course, you've already got one foot out the door on your marriage. If you are too lazy to change it, shame on you. If you don't want to change it in order to take a "feminist" stand, try something original for a change. If you as a guy change your name to accommodate marriage, untuck that thing before it permanently welds itself between your cheeks.

Slugman
12-22-2004, 11:18 AM
It had nothing to do with not letting people know I was married, I wore a ring, had joint accounts, bought a house....blah blah blah. Just because I didn't change my name it means it means I'm not committed to my marriage? We were together for 5 years before we got married, had been working together for 6 years(met at work)...needless to say my swinging single days :rolleyes: were over long before we were married.

I wasn't trying to say that those issues applied to you - I was just explaining how I felt in my situation... I was not tryingto imply anything.

Just curious - how old were you when you got married? My wife and I were talking about this the other day. We know so many people who are around our age (she is 27, I'm 33) that are divorced, or getting a divorce. It's surprising to us, but then again we've only been married for 2 years (together for 5). We wonder if we are different than all of them since we waited longer (a lot of them were married by 22), or have we just not yet gotten to that point in our relationship?

-BB-
12-22-2004, 11:28 AM
I say that it is up to the wife to decide if she wants to have a different last name than her children. ;) :devil:

bibs
12-22-2004, 11:34 AM
Those of who think it's an insult for the women to not change her name.....if the man was unwilling to change his name to hers instead would that be just as much of an insult?

I'm just wondering the reasoning. Is it just the women not changing hers that is insulting, or does it go both ways?

ever heard of tradition? Its been happening since the the first wedding to continue the males family name, back in the day when your family name meant somthing. Personally I think its assnine to hypenate the name. So many kids I work with have hypenated names and it confuses the kids. And thats just one reason... so many more.

bibs
12-22-2004, 11:36 AM
I'm one of those people who has a dying last name. It's really rare and I believe there are less than 100 people in the country with the name (and the numbers just keep getting smaller). Given the number of male progeny in the last couple decades, theres very few people to carry on the name. Because of that for some reason, I really want to keep my name (if I ever actually get married!!!).

same with my last name.

Snacks
12-22-2004, 11:37 AM
I wasn't trying to say that those issues applied to you - I was just explaining how I felt in my situation... I was not tryingto imply anything.

Just curious - how old were you when you got married? My wife and I were talking about this the other day. We know so many people who are around our age (she is 27, I'm 33) that are divorced, or getting a divorce. It's surprising to us, but then again we've only been married for 2 years (together for 5). We wonder if we are different than all of them since we waited longer (a lot of them were married by 22), or have we just not yet gotten to that point in our relationship?

I was 26 he was 27. Married for about 1.5 years. Luckly we have a good relationship now since we still own property together. I think my b/f is so insistant that I change my name if we get married since I didn't the first time and ended up getting divorced. He is one of those guys that feel if a woman doesn't change her name, she doesn't think the marriage will last.

Velocity Girl
12-22-2004, 12:57 PM
Biggins and bibs....you both touched on something that I don't always 100% agree with...."Because it's tradition". I personally don't find that a compelling enough reason. Traditons are laws, they're guidelines, and if they don't work for someone, so be it.

And yes, I do follow some traditions and do so happily. I am not opposed to the name change obviously, but I think it should be a choice.

And as for the other wedding traditions....yes, I have the traditional two rings, but Jason has two also! So should he not have his second ring just because it's not tradition? That would be silly, just the same as I personally feel it's silly that a women HAS to take the mans name.

Maybe the household I grew up in plays a role into my feelings on this. My parents are divorced and I have a step-dad who I consider more my dad than my real father is, was, or ever could be. I don't consider him any less my dad because we don't have the same blood or the same last name.......so I guess I don't feel that the last name binds the people together, it's how you feel about them and the family you are a part of.

Megan Black
12-22-2004, 01:19 PM
Biggins and bibs....you both touched on something that I don't always 100% agree with...."Because it's tradition". I personally don't find that a compelling enough reason. Traditons are laws, they're guidelines, and if they don't work for someone, so be it.

And yes, I do follow some traditions and do so happily. I am not opposed to the name change obviously, but I think it should be a choice.

And as for the other wedding traditions....yes, I have the traditional two rings, but Jason has two also! So should he not have his second ring just because it's not tradition? That would be silly, just the same as I personally feel it's silly that a women HAS to take the mans name.

Maybe the household I grew up in plays a role into my feelings on this. My parents are divorced and I have a step-dad who I consider more my dad than my real father is, was, or ever could be. I don't consider him any less my dad because we don't have the same blood or the same last name.......so I guess I don't feel that the last name binds the people together, it's how you feel about them and the family you are a part of.

:stupid: about the whole traditions thing. times are changing peeps. i'm all for traditions and being old fashioned as long as there are still equal benefits for the parties.

for whoever's friends who got married, changed their name and stay at home to take care of the kids, I guess I could see that as a fairly equal exchange. Guy makes the money, provides for the family, woman gives up her name. Not that it's that black and white but it's an example.

Thing is that lifestyle may not appeal to some women these days so why should they be expected to give something up when they are not getting the return efforts? They are making their own money and providing for themselves, where is the equal exchange of sacrific if she gives up her name?

Not that I know what would make a marraige work forever but I believe there has to be an equal sacrifice, in whatever form that may be.

It is interesting to see how much of an individualistic society America has become (I'm not sure about elsewhere). People are starting to become their own islands. Mabye I'm off base but I see people in America moving towards a goal of not needing anyone anymore. Family units are breaking apart, as well as traditional marraiges, even organized religion seems to be becoming less appealling...all those things don't function without sacrificing yourself to someone else (your spouse/your family/god, or allah or whoever).Not saying this is right or wrong...just kinda interesting to observe and I'm curious to know where this will go....hmmmmmmmmmm

punkassean
12-22-2004, 01:42 PM
Biggins and bibs....you both touched on something that I don't always 100% agree with...."Because it's tradition". I personally don't find that a compelling enough reason. Traditons are laws, they're guidelines, and if they don't work for someone, so be it.

And yes, I do follow some traditions and do so happily. I am not opposed to the name change obviously, but I think it should be a choice.

And as for the other wedding traditions....yes, I have the traditional two rings, but Jason has two also! So should he not have his second ring just because it's not tradition? That would be silly, just the same as I personally feel it's silly that a women HAS to take the mans name.

I think most of us agree with that general statement. It's kinda like Xmas, Xmas was started free from religious affiliation, it wasn't until the mid or late 1800's I believe that Americans put their own religious twist on it. Nowadays most people (even many Jewish people) celebrate Xmas but not in any one "traditional" sense. Xmas is more about being with your family and spreading the love than it is about Jesus or Santa Claus for that matter and most people have adapted Xmas to work for their beliefs or to not affiliate it with any beliefs at all. Traditions are ever evolving and I think it's cool when people can embrace the tradition but put a twist on it to suit their own beliefs or lifestyle. We shouldn't forget our past but we need to evolve to keep things relevant. It's not like you have to take it as-is or leave it.

I think that the way you and your husband both have engagement rings is a cool way of doing that.

I guess what I'm saying is I like creative ways to update a tradition but I dislike it when people just throw them out the window completely, for some reason I just find it disrespectful. Maybe I see it as disrespect to the people who laid the path to where we are now.

I think that even though we live in an age where half of marriages result in divorce we should still strive for the ideal, to stay together and make our relationships work. I think that taking a name shows that commitment and selflessness needed to make relationship work.If both parties aren't willing to compromise and find a middle ground then it's not going to work in the long haul. I think a persons reluctance to this is a good preliminary indicator of commitment issues.

The only reason I think that women should take a man's name is because a women grows up all the while being made aware of this and men the opposite. after X amount of years people accept that and it just seems funny to reverse it "just because". It's kinda like finding out that you were adopted later in life which for some people opens up a can of emotional worms as opposed to if they were told that all along they'd be better equipped and dealing with it. Obviously thought if both parties are agreeable then go for it, you have to do whatever works for you. But I think that's the problem, this new trend doesn't work for a lot of guys and they feel forced into it and it just starts things off in a bad direction.

Maybe the household I grew up in plays a role into my feelings on this. My parents are divorced and I have a step-dad who I consider more my dad than my real father is, was, or ever could be. I don't consider him any less my dad because we don't have the same blood or the same last name.......so I guess I don't feel that the last name binds the people together, it's how you feel about them and the family you are a part of.

In the end, you are right it's not about the name. But it is about the commitment and taking the name signifies that IMO.

-BB-
12-22-2004, 01:59 PM
And as for the other wedding traditions....yes, I have the traditional two rings, but Jason has two also! So should he not have his second ring just because it's not tradition? That would be silly, just the same as I personally feel it's silly that a women HAS to take the mans name..

No, not as long as you have the bigger diamond.
;)

Snacks
12-22-2004, 02:10 PM
I think that even though we live in an age where half of marriages result in divorce we should still strive for the ideal, to stay together and make our relationships work. I think that taking a name shows that commitment and selflessness needed to make relationship work.If both parties aren't willing to compromise and find a middle ground then it's not going to work in the long haul. I think a persons reluctance to this is a good preliminary indicator of commitment issues.



I don't think that a woman not changing her name means that she is not commited to the relationship or is selfish. Maybe she just isn't into the whole traditional theme....or her last name has strong famliy meaning to her? Or she is established in she career or clintail with her current last name.

So the women that change their last name are more into their marriage than the ones that don't?

Funny, every marriage that didn't work out and the wife never changed her name all the men say...'See, she didn't think it was going to work out because she never changed her name'.

MUTOLI
12-22-2004, 02:11 PM
Sorry to butt in! I am married-have been for over a year now! I was sooooo happy to take his last name because I can't stand my old last name...lets just say I got teased alot from the movie Space Balls (Swartz)! Thanks for marrying me Ethan! :love: Back on subject...unless the last name was completly terrible I feel that taking the husband last name is good. However, I think that the women should choose...after all..it's there name!!!

Mocha
12-22-2004, 02:15 PM
I got married this past July. I was planning on using my husband's name socially and keeping my name professionally. Well, that has turned into a nightmare! I forget what name I've used for what, and I have to carry my marriage certificate around for ID. I'm really not a fan of my maiden name anyway, so I'll be changing my name to his in the new year. It will be so much easier, and frankly I like the idea of being a family with one surname. I struggled with the decision though, because most women I know in their 30's would never even think of changing their name. I almost felt like there was something wrong with me for wanting to take my husband's name.

bibs
12-22-2004, 02:32 PM
I got married this past July. I was planning on using my husband's name socially and keeping my name professionally. Well, that has turned into a nightmare! I forget what name I've used for what, and I have to carry my marriage certificate around for ID. I'm really not a fan of my maiden name anyway, so I'll be changing my name to his in the new year. It will be so much easier, and frankly I like the idea of being a family with one surname. I struggled with the decision though, because most women I know in their 30's would never even think of changing their name. I almost felt like there was something wrong with me for wanting to take my husband's name.

Id be LEARY of using his name too...heheheh :D

douglas
12-22-2004, 02:33 PM
personally, I would have a serious problem if the person that I wanted to marry was planning on keeping her maiden name.

RhinofromWA
12-22-2004, 02:58 PM
And as for the other wedding traditions....yes, I have the traditional two rings, but Jason has two also! So should he not have his second ring just because it's not tradition? That would be silly, just the same as I personally feel it's silly that a women HAS to take the mans name.His two rings isn't so strange....

It was the fact that Freak wore a white wedding dress at the wedding.... :sneaky:.....not that there is anything wrong with that. :D

RhinofromWA
12-22-2004, 03:06 PM
I personally don't see changing the last name as a "equal" sacrifice to Staying home and rasing the kids....that Megan B eluded to.

I am probably going to catch flack for that. :think:

Also I associate the refusing to take your husbands families last name with some friends of my family. She took his name and then changed it back and is angry if you call her by her "married name" It seems like she did it in a cold and hurtfull manner. but that is just my experience with it. She seems a hartless cold bitch.....and did it becuase of her less than loving feelings.

To those "professionals" out there who fear people won't associate with you after you take a new name....is kind of strange. Since that was once the norm....it would seem that people would be confused at not taking their husbands last name. They are not going to leave you if you change your last name, that is rediculous. You got married, people understand that and takes much less time to explain than not taking it.

If you are a movie star sure keep the old name, unless it helps your career. But most movie star marriages don't last anyway....so just keep the original I guess. :D

I say change your name to take your husbands to even if symbolically show the union into his family......I am lucky as I have tradition on my side. ;)

Mocha
12-22-2004, 04:27 PM
Id be LEARY of using his name too...heheheh :D


hahaha...that was good, Bibster!! :)

bibs
12-22-2004, 05:13 PM
hahaha...that was good, Bibster!! :)


hehehe, tell him I said OINK!! ;)
Im at work with no instant messanger....:D

Megan Black
12-22-2004, 05:15 PM
oh you are SO in trouble for that little comment!!!

hahaha! juuuuuust kidding little rhino! :D


I say change your name to take your husbands to even if symbolically show the union into his family......I am lucky as I have tradition on my side. ;)

I think everyone would agree that symbolically showing the union into a family is positive stuff but I think peeps are wondering maybe WHY giving up their own family name is considered tradition. And also, after she has shown her acknowledgement, how is the husband symbolically showing his union to his wife? Where's the exchange? And if it's something like, "well, he shows her by being a good husband" then why isn't being a good wife just as good of an acknowledgement?

I'm curious to know where this tradition came from, anyone know? When it comes down to the meat-and-potatoes of it, I'm unsure as to why it's the husband's family that is acknowledged/accepted and not the wifes.

Anyone know?? History peeps, where are you!

Slugman
12-22-2004, 05:35 PM
I'm curious to know where this tradition came from, anyone know? When it comes down to the meat-and-potatoes of it, I'm unsure as to why it's the husband's family that is acknowledged/accepted and not the wifes.

Anyone know?? History peeps, where are you!
I'll make a guess that it comes from the days of clans. If you become part of a clan you'd been know by the clan name...



Question in general for the "not taking" women - so if you do not take his name, then which name do your children use?

DH Diva
12-22-2004, 05:46 PM
I'll make a guess that it comes from the days of clans. If you become part of a clan you'd been know by the clan name...



Question in general for the "not taking" women - so if you do not take his name, then which name do your children use?

SIMPLE!!! Just don't have any!! I'm not having children anyways, so whatever name I use really has no impact on anyone. Yes, I know I'm going to get the "you'll want kids some day" crap, but really if you knew me, you wouldn't even try that. I'm a no kids gal. Zero praternal instinct. Babies cry and I cringe. Dave's the same way though, so all's good.

Velocity Girl
12-22-2004, 05:57 PM
SIMPLE!!! Just don't have any!! I'm not having children anyways, so whatever name I use really has no impact on anyone. Yes, I know I'm going to get the "you'll want kids some day" crap, but really if you knew me, you wouldn't even try that. I'm a no kids gal. Zero praternal instinct. Babies cry and I cringe. Dave's the same way though, so all's good.


So nice to hear I'm not the only one who was born without maternal instincts!! And the older I get, the more my feelings are confirmed that I indeed was not meant to be a mother (other than a puppy mom that is :D )

Slugman
12-22-2004, 06:11 PM
SIMPLE!!! Just don't have any!! I'm not having children anyways, so whatever name I use really has no impact on anyone. Yes, I know I'm going to get the "you'll want kids some day" crap, but really if you knew me, you wouldn't even try that. I'm a no kids gal. Zero praternal instinct. Babies cry and I cringe. Dave's the same way though, so all's good.

Good choice! My wife and I are the same way - it's fun having a neice and a nephew, but we don't want any of our own!

bibs
12-22-2004, 06:16 PM
true, I love kids and all...but its nice to be able to send them home after a few minutes :D

Snacks
12-22-2004, 06:57 PM
SIMPLE!!! Just don't have any!! I'm not having children anyways, so whatever name I use really has no impact on anyone. Yes, I know I'm going to get the "you'll want kids some day" crap, but really if you knew me, you wouldn't even try that. I'm a no kids gal. Zero praternal instinct. Babies cry and I cringe. Dave's the same way though, so all's good.

ME TOO! I like babies....they're cute and so soft, but the minute they cry I'm done. It's not just babies, toddlers drive me crazy. I have had to leave the store because I was going to commit a crime against parents before. I was waiting some motherly instinct to come along, but after 31 years, nothing. Heck, I forget to feed the cat have the time!!!

DH Diva
12-22-2004, 07:45 PM
(other than a puppy mom that is :D )

I'm very content being a puppy mom! I don't think I told you a Freak yet, but I adopted Indy a friend!! His names Giovanni (Gio for short). We've had him about a month now. He's a red brindle (wide stripe brindle), 3 years old, and just the sweetest little thing. I'll send some pictures! Indy and him get along great too. I started fostering him after his previous owner abandoned him at the adoption kennel, and after two days we decided to keep him.

allsk8sno
12-23-2004, 04:59 PM
haha tradition....we (rainbow_smoke) and i just got married and our wedding was far from traditional (www.spackman.ws), we had no true attendents and it was just us and the pastor...(and my sword) while i think most traditions are fated to fall the name change is really something the couple should share as a way of showing their union and such ... now as to who's name to take that is soley up to the couple and i think as long as they both agree whole heartedly on the same thing then it fine, be it his, hers, gobblygoop... that being said i didn't really like my last name alot growing up but i have grown into it and was happy she wanted to take my name but then it wasn't a big change for her...(www.spackman.ws)

grimm
12-25-2004, 07:04 AM
Altho im not a "lady", i wanted to share my opinion on this.

I dont believe in marriage at all, since to me its only about a piece of paper and making legal stuff easier IF the relationship doesnt last. But that stuff can be sorted with a little effort anyhow

But to those who do believe in marriage, i dont see why you people should have to follow a certain norm, such as taking names etc. It is up to the people getting married to decide this between them. I dont see why a woman should take the man's name, or vice versa for that matter. Also i dont see the woman as the "pants wearer" if she doesnt wanna take the man's name. It doesnt make the slightest difference to me.

So to you the threadstarter all i have to say is do what you feel most comfortable with and what you agree on with your boyfriend. That, and only that, is what its about in my opinion. Good luck!

MudGrrl
01-03-2005, 12:24 PM
The first time I was engaged, he said that he was going to take my name.
He didn't.
We aren't together anymore.

I am now with someone who loves his family very much.
I will probably take his name......
but I want to figure out how my name will be represented...........I have a very Scottish last name, and am proud my ancestors. I am related to a Queen.

I may take his last name, but he's gonna wear my tartan/crest in the ceremony.
Fck the tux, wear the kilt.

And for the guys who would be really pissed if a chick doesn't take your name, I would venture a guess that you probably wouldn't pick up a gal who would think to do so.

geargrrl
01-03-2005, 01:09 PM
couple of thoughts...

kids, if you are planning on having any - hypenated names are a little more of a pain to deal with than a single last name.

some traditions have the kids bearing the maiden name as a middle name, thinking of mudgrrls Scots heritage, that might be a good way to preserve it.

I took my hubbys name, just for simplicity sake.

geargrrl

MudGrrl
01-04-2005, 09:13 AM
some traditions have the kids bearing the maiden name as a middle name, thinking of mudgrrls Scots heritage, that might be a good way to preserve it.


My great grandmother was an only child. Her last name was Stewart. She married my great grandfather, last name Barker. They had one child, my grandfather. My grandfather had 4 girls.

My mother tried to keep the Stewart name in the family, so my brother is Nathan Stewart......

Yes, I like that idea.

Skookum
01-08-2005, 10:59 AM
if tn's last name had been assface,

HEY!!! That's MY last name! What's wrong with Assface?

Skookum
01-08-2005, 11:10 AM
lets just say I got teased alot from the movie Space Balls (Swartz)!
Ahahaha you've let the cat outta the bag. :evil: :evil: :evil:

Skookum
01-08-2005, 11:23 AM
After reading this thread and thinking about this topic for a second i've come to the conclusion that when you get married both people are venturing forth in a new chapter in life of commitment and love. So then both should change their name to something new. Since i thought of this novel idea i propose everyone who marries change their last name to mine. Assface. And when you do i will only charge a nominal tribute fee of $5.
Case closed... next!